Creation Ministries International

Creation Ministries International
social networks
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Subscribe to RSS
Subscribe to eNews
frame top left frame top frame top right
frame left
Creation Magazine Volume 17 Issue 1 CoverFirst published:
Creation ex nihilo 17(1):45
December 1994
frame right
frame bottom leftframe bottomframe bottom right

Pick the difference

Many times an entire fossil species and its evolutionary relationships are claimed on the basis of one or a few bony fragments. But there are pitfalls, even when you have the whole skeleton, in using similarity to prove some evolutionary point.

Look at the three skulls in the diagram. B and C are clearly most similar. Yet A is of a Pekinese dog, B of another common dog, while C is that of a bear, which in evolutionary terms is regarded as only distantly related to dogs.

Skull A
Skull B
Skull C

The two skulls which appear most dissimilar are in fact the same interbreeding species.

(Drawings from Origins: What Is At Stake?, by Wilbert H. Rusch, Sr, Creation Research Society Books, Terre Haute (Indiana), 1991, p. 26. Used with permission.)

social networks
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Subscribe to RSS
Subscribe to eNews
Add to Digg Add to Del.icio.us Add to Reddit Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Stumble Upon Add to MySpace Add to LinkedIn Add to Google Bookmarks