Refuting Evolution
A handbook for students, parents, and teachers countering the latest arguments for
evolution
by Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D., F.M.
Foreword
When the first edition of Refuting Evolution first appeared, the foreword
was written by a well-known creation speaker who said, “In my opinion, this
new publication is one of the most up-to-date critiques of modern evolutionary theory,
one that has been so well researched and documented it will challenge the most ardent
evolutionist.”
Refuting Evolution went on to exceed our highest expectations, becoming
possibly the most-read creation book ever (after the Bible!). Many thousands of
people bought multiple copies to give to their relatives, friends, work colleagues,
fellow students, schoolteachers and pastors.
The author, Dr Jonathan Sarfati, is not only a brilliant scientist, but a master
of concise, clear communication and logical thinking. He produced this succinct
masterpiece in direct response to a book published by the prestigious US National
Academy of Sciences—a book meant to teach biology teachers how to teach evolution
so that their students would believe it. The NAS gave vast numbers of their book
to public schools and other institutions—free of charge. Persuasively and
professionally presented, the NAS clearly hoped that their publication would extinguish
belief in biblical creation, giving public school teachers all the arguments they
needed to counter the growing numbers of creation-believers in their classrooms.
In an amazingly concise refutation of the NAS’s best arguments for evolution
and long ages, Dr Sarfati’s incisive mind lays bare the shallowness of that
apologetic for the prevailing culture-myth of our times—that everything made
itself without a creator.
In recommending Refuting Evolution, I often jest that it is not a very
thick volume because it does not take very long to refute the best arguments for
evolution. However, it is the clarity of the logic that makes for the book’s
compactness, more than the ease of refutation of the arguments. Many a reader will
reflect, “Why didn’t I think of that?”
Jonathan begins by showing that the issue is not really science versus religion,
but the science of one religious view (atheism / materialism) versus the science
of another religious view (biblical theism). Ultimately, one’s religious predisposition
determines the approach to the evidence. The “facts” don’t speak
for themselves when it comes to our origins. It is certainly important to understand
this.
No one who really wants to understand the times we live in can afford to ignore
this landmark work. Our ideas about where we came from directly influence our views
of what life is all about—the future of Christianity and civilization is at
stake. This book could hardly be more important—or timely.
Dr Don Batten, Ph.D. (plant physiology)—senior
staff scientist and speaker, Creation Ministries International (Australia).
Introduction
The
National Academy of Sciences (NAS) has recently published an educator’s guidebook
entitled Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science. It has been
made available to educators throughout America to encourage teachers to incorporate
more evolution in their classes and basically teach particles-to-people evolution
as a fact. The guidebook states its purpose in the preface:
Many students receive little or no exposure to the most important concept in modern
biology, a concept essential to understanding key aspects of living things —
biological evolution.
However, it’s hard to believe that ‘many students receive little or
no exposure’ to evolution. The whole secular education system in America (and
most other countries around the world) is underpinned by evolution. After reviewing
a number of biology textbooks in the secular school system, we find they are all
blatantly pro-evolution. It’s also hard to believe that evolution is
an ‘essential concept’ in biology, because most ‘key aspects of
living things’ were discovered by creationists.
For example, Louis Pasteur discovered that many
diseases were caused by germs and showed that life comes only from life,
Gregor Mendel discovered genetics, and Carolus Linnaeus developed the modern
classification system, to name but a few creationist pioneers of modern biology
[see The Creationist Basis for Modern Science].
Also, many highly qualified biological scientists of the present day do not accept
evolution—their work is not affected in the slightest by whether or not fish
really did turn into philosophers .
Refuting Evolution seeks to redress the lopsided pro-evolutionary way in
which origins are taught. The NAS guidebook, which is compiled by many leading evolutionists,
obviously contains the most up-to-date and major arguments for evolution. Thus,
this critique of it addresses current evolutionary theory as taught in colleges,
public schools, and as broadcast by the media. Refuting Evolution responds
to many of the arguments in Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science
so that a general critique of evolution can be made available to challenge educators,
students, and parents. At the same time, Refuting Evolution gives as much
positive information as space permits to defend the creationist position. Thus,
it provides a good summary of the arguments against evolution and for creation.
It should stimulate much discussion and help students and teachers to think more
critically about origins.
By downloading this material, you agree to the following terms with respect to the
use of the requested material: CMI grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable
license to print or download one (1) copy of the copyrighted work. The copyrighted
work will be used for non-commercial, personal purposes only. You may not prepare,
manufacture, copy, use, promote, distribute, or sell a derivative work of the copyrighted
work without the express approval of Creation Ministries International Ltd. Approval
must be expressed and in writing, and failure to respond shall not be deemed approval.
All rights in the copyrighted work not specifically granted to you are reserved
by CMI. All such reserved rights may be exercised by CMI. This Agreement, and all
interpretations thereof, shall be deemed to be in accordance with the law of the
state of Queensland, Australia. Any dispute arising out of this Agreement shall
be resolved in accordance with Queensland law and the courts of Queensland shall
be deemed to be those of proper jurisdiction and venue.
(Available in
Spanish)
|