Share
A- A A+

Article from:

Journal of Creation  Volume 19Issue 1 Cover

Journal of Creation 19(1):16–17
April 2005

Free Email News
Creation magazine print - 1 yr new subn


US $25.00
View Item
The Creation Answers Book
by Various

US $14.00
View Item
Journal of Creation  Volume 19 Issue 1 Cover

First published:
Journal of Creation
19(1):16–17
April 2005

Browse this issue

Subscribe to Journal of Creation

‘Ripples’ of galaxies—another blow to the big bang

by

31 August 2006

Astronomers have recently claimed to detect a ‘ripple’ pattern in the clustering of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS).1 They claim this pattern is a result of sound waves produced during the big bang. However, as with all things, it is important to distinguish between the data and the interpretation. The new discovery does not support the big bang, and is in fact perfectly consistent with biblical creation.

Background

All the stars you see in the night-time sky are part of the Milky Way Galaxy—a large spiral collection of over one-hundred billion stars. The universe contains many such galaxies: some smaller than ours, others much bigger.
Galaxies are organized into clusters, which, in turn, are organized on an even larger scale forming a large non-uniform structure of filaments and voids. You can think of this like a gigantic, irregular spider-web; the galaxies exist primarily along the strands of the web, with fewer in between.

New discovery

Image by Andrew Fruchter (STScI) et al., WFPC2, HST, NASA

Abell 2218 galaxy cluster

Abell 2218 galaxy cluster, imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope. Analysis of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data for 46,748 luminous red galaxies suggests a subtle large-scale pattern of galaxy clustering.

Until recently, the galaxy clustering did not show any well-defined pattern or size scale; filaments of galaxies connect in seemingly random ways and come in many different sizes. But investigators have apparently discovered a weak ‘pattern’ in the arrangement of galaxies.

Galaxies have a very slight preference to be separated by 500 million light-years (five billion-million-million kilometres) than other distances, according to SDSS researchers. This pattern is extremely weak; you would not be able to see it by eye. The SDSS researchers have used some mathematical techniques to extract this ethereal pattern.

Data vs interpretation

This subtle organization of galaxies is the data. The interpretation that many astronomers have offered is that sound waves from the big bang produced this pattern. Let’s examine this interpretation.

In the big bang story of origins, the universe starts out very small and very dense. Some regions are slightly denser than others. This imbalance creates pressure waves (sound2) which propagate through the early universe. Much like a rock thrown in a pond causes ripples to expand, imagine many rocks being thrown in at the same time. The interaction of all the waves would cause a complicated, irregular pattern of ripples. In the big bang model, the sound propagating in the early universe creates regions of greater density.3 Eventually, gravity causes these denser regions to collapse to form stars and galaxies as the universe expands. So, in essence, the sound waves act as ‘seeds’ for galaxies to form.

Secular astronomers believe that the weak pattern detected in galaxy locations (the data) is a result of the sound waves from the big bang (the interpretation). Notice that this interpretation simply assumes that the big bang is true. The biases of the researchers have affected their interpretation of the data. The evidence has been interpreted to match their beliefs.

The big bang, however, has been refuted on the basis of both Scripture and good science. For example, the big bang is not compatible with the order, timescale and cause of the events of creation as recorded in Genesis. Really, the big bang is a secular opponent of the biblical framework.4

“ This weak cluster-pattern of galaxies does not support the big bang with its billions of years. ”

So, this weak cluster-pattern of galaxies does not support the big bang with its billions of years. On the contrary, the big bang is simply assumed in order to explain this clustering within a naturalistic framework.

Furthermore, the big bang is not the only unwarranted assumption involved in the ‘sound waves’ interpretation. The secular explanation also assumes that stars and galaxies can form from regions of high density. But this has never been observed. In fact, no galaxy has ever been observed to form at all! And there are tremendous scientific difficulties in getting stars to form from collapsing gas clouds.5 No wonder that even many secular scientists blast the big bang.6

Consistent with creation

From a biblical creation view, there is no reason to think that the clusters of galaxies were formed by sound waves at all. We know from Scripture that God made the stars (and thus the galaxies, which are composed of stars) on Day 4 of the Creation Week (Genesis 1:16). It may be that the galaxies were organized in a non-random way by the Creator’s hand for His pleasure.7 The subtle pattern of galaxy locations (if confirmed) would be perfectly consistent with the order and creativity we have come to expect from the God of Scripture.

References and notes

  1. Eisenstein, D.J. et al., Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large-scale correlation function of SDSS luminous red galaxies, 10 January 2005. Return to text
  2. Sound cannot travel through empty space because sound waves are compressions of a material medium. However, the early universe (according to the big bang cosmology) would have been very dense. It would not have been ‘empty’ and this would have allowed sound to travel. Return to text
  3. The regions of higher density in the Cosmic Microwave Background are also supposedly produced in a similar fashion. However, the weakness of the ripples is highly problematic for big bang cosmology. See: Newton, R., Light Travel-time: a problem for the big bang, Creation 25(4):48–49, 2003. Return to text
  4. Sarfati, J., Refuting Compromise, Master Books, Green Forest, AR, 2004, for an excellent refutation of the big bang and ‘progressive creationism’ (billions of years). Return to text
  5. Chown, M., Let there be light, New Scientist 157(2120):26–30, 1998.
    See also: <www.creation.com/starform>. Return to text
  6. Wieland, C., Secular scientists blast the big bang: what now for naïve apologetics? Creation 27(2):23–25, 2005. Return to text
  7. Hartnett, J., New evidence: we really are at the centre of the universe, Journal of Creation 18(1):9, 2004. Humphreys, D.R., Our galaxy is the centre of the universe, ‘quantized’ red shifts show, Journal of Creation 16(2):95–104, 2002. Return to text

God did it in six days and rested on the seventh. A good model to follow as individuals but corporately, CMI provides new articles 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year. Will you consider a small gift to support this site? Support this site

Copied to clipboard
4610
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.