The giraffe’s neck: icon of evolution or icon of creation?
By Daniel Anderson and Carl Wieland
Published: 5 January 2007 (GMT+10)
The long neck of the giraffe continues to be misrepresented as an icon of evolution.
Discover recently alluded to the standard evolutionary explanation for
the origin of the giraffe’s neck:
By Darwin’s reasoning, giraffes have long necks because longer-necked giraffes
can reach more leaves, thrive, produce more offspring, and so increase the proportion
of long-neck giraffes.1
Darwin himself wrote ‘… it seems to me almost certain that an ordinary
hoofed quadruped might be converted into a giraffe.’2 He speculated that four-legged animals with longer
and longer necks would be capable of reaching higher leaves and vegetation. Thus,
during droughts, they would be more likely to survive and pass on this characteristic,
than those with shorter necks. Over time, a creature that was not a giraffe would
evolve into a giraffe with an extraordinarily long neck.
Superficially, it sounds logical. However, as with many evolutionary explanations,
the hard scientific data reveals a far different story. The fossil, genetic, physiological,
observational and logical evidence actually provides much stronger support for creation,
not evolution.
Fossil Evidence
If the giraffe’s neck elongated over long periods of time, then we should
see evidence of this in the fossil record, with numerous transitional forms progressively
getting longer. However, that is not what the fossil evidence shows. There are short-necked
fossil quadrupeds, including some, like the living okapi, which have features in
common with giraffes. However, when we see fossils of Giraffa, there are
no short, intermediate and long-necked forms, let alone showing a progression. In
other words, the fossil record reveals that giraffes have always possessed long
necks.
Photo by Aaron Logan, LIGHTmatter
The gerenuk (or giraffe gazelle) is a long-necked antelope that exclusively browses
in trees. It may well be an expression of the neck length variation possible within
an original ‘gazelle’ or similar kind. But it does not have the long legs or other
specialized structures of a giraffe; these were simply not part of the genetic repertoire
of its kind. It stands on its hind legs to reach arboreal vegetation. A giraffe
is much more than just a ‘long-necked antelope’.
In addition, there are well-preserved giraffe footprints next to the fully human
footprints in Laetoli, Tanzania dated at around 3.5 million years old on the evolutionary
time scale. The shape and depth of these footprints strongly suggest that these
ancient giraffes were virtually identical in height, weight and stride length to
those living today3.
Genetic and Physiological Evidence
Many are unaware that Darwin’s book actually suggested that use and disuse
of body parts was somehow inherited. In other words, giraffes that stretched their
necks further were more likely to pass ‘long-neckedness’ on to their
offspring. That notion has been thoroughly discredited, of course. Use and disuse
does not affect the genetic program that is passed on to offspring.
Today’s ‘neo’-Darwinist believes, instead, that genetic mutations—i.e.
accidental copying errors—were responsible for some giraffes having longer
necks, which were then selected for, i.e. they were the ones more likely to survive
the droughts mentioned earlier. Mutations, such as the one causing achondroplastic
dwarfism in humans, can dramatically alter limb proportions.
It is conceivable that a mutation could cause an antelope-like creature to have
a slightly longer neck. However, such a mutation would have no effect on the length
of the legs. These are under separate genetic control.
Any dramatic mutational increase in neck length would also cause severe health hazards.
A multitude of precisely fine-tuned anatomical and physiological mechanisms would
have to simultaneously accompany the skeletal changes. Giraffes were created with
specialized valves in their neck and head to protect them from massive fluctuations
in blood pressure while lifting or lowering their heads. Without these vital supporting
structures already in place, the giraffe would rupture blood vessels in the brain
or in the retina while lowering its head to drink. As a result, any stepwise evolution
of the giraffe neck is physiologically implausible. A giraffe is in any case much
more than a long-legged antelope (See box re the gerenuk).
Observational and Logical Evidence
If giraffe survival depended on being able to reach higher and higher leaves during
a drought, then giraffes would have died out a long time ago with the death of the
[shorter] females and young
giraffes.
During droughts, water is much more important than food. Animals can survive long
periods of time without food, but not without water. A bigger, taller giraffe would
require much more water than a smaller, shorter giraffe. Therefore, it is actually
more likely that the taller giraffes would die from dehydration. In reality, a creature’s
ability to survive droughts and other harsh environmental conditions is determined
by a number of other factors besides height and size.
Also, female giraffes can be as much as two feet shorter than male giraffes. In
addition, young giraffes are much shorter than fully mature ones. If giraffe survival
depended on being able to reach higher and higher leaves during a drought, then
giraffes would have died out a long time ago with the death of the females and young
giraffes.
Also, giraffes live with shorter tree browsers such as gazelles, impalas, elands
and gerenuks. All of these animals have successfully survived periods of drought
with much shorter necks.
Icon of Creation
The neck of the giraffe should be considered an icon of creation. The Bible tells
us that all land animals (including giraffes) were created fully formed, to reproduce
after their own ‘kind’ on day six of creation. Giraffes have always
had long necks, and they have always been giraffes.
References
- Ruvinsky, DNA Is Not Destiny, Discover, November
2006. Return to text.
- Darwin, Charles, On the origin of species,
P 227-8, Random House, 1993. Return to text.
- Sodera, V.,
One small Speck to Man, p. 113. Return to text.
| Julie I. wrote: “Thank you so much for this site! I am very blessed already. I appreciate you sharing all these helps and resources. Especially the free ones. We are grateful!” Keep the free stuff coming.  | | |
|