The gaiety of this photo showing the colourful dresses and unusual headwear of today’s Herero women is in stark contrast to the torment their predecessors went through.
Like most visitors to Namibia,1 one of the memorable pictures I carried away was of the noble-looking Herero people. Their women wear colourful, voluminous Victorian-style dresses and hats, and the men wear uniforms on ceremonial occasions. How terribly sad it was to learn that 100 years ago, their great-grandparents had been the victims of the first genocide of the 20th century.
During the colonial land-grab of African countries by European nations after the 1884–85 Berlin Conference,2 Germany annexed Namibia, then known as South-West Africa. German settlers quickly ran roughshod over the historical rights and claims of the Herero tribal inhabitants, and for the next 20 years plundered their lands, houses and livestock. Of this period, the Governor, Theodor Leutwein, wrote that the German settlers had an ‘inborn feeling of belonging to a superior race’.3 Thus racism was rife. The Herero were regularly referred to as ‘baboons’; the men were commonly beaten to death for minor infringements, and the women were made sex slaves by the soldiers and settlers.
In these circumstances, it is hardly surprising that an uprising occurred. On 12 January 1904, fighting broke out between Herero tribesmen and the settlers, in the town of Okahandja, where there was a German fort.
The response of the Berlin government to this insurrection by a colonized people who had dared to resist the might of the German nation was fast and ruthless. Kaiser Wilhelm II dispatched 14,000 troops to the region under the command of Lieutenant-General Lothar von Trotha. Von Trotha was renowned for the ruthless efficiency with which he had helped to suppress the Boxer Rebellion in China in 1900, and to quash resistance to his nation’s occupation of German East Africa (today’s Rwanda, Burundi and Tanzania).
Von Trotha’s written goal was: “I believe that the [Herero] nation as such should be exterminated.”4 He stated: “The exercise of violence and crass terrorism and even with gruesomeness was and is my policy. I destroy the African tribes with streams of blood and streams of money. Only following this cleansing can something new emerge, which will remain.”5
That the German settlers and a high-ranking officer like General von Trotha would hold to these ‘superior race’, ‘survival-of-the-fittest-through-“cleansing”-of-the-weakest’ views is hardly surprising. Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (which is subtitled By Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life) had been translated into German in 1875, and his evolutionary theories had for decades been avidly promoted to all and sundry by the popular books and theatrical presentations of Ernst Haeckel.6 The German nation had also been subjected for many years to the ‘God-is-dead’ atheism of Nietzsche.7
This, too, was a consequence of Darwinian thought. Nietzsche believed that Darwinian evolution would eventually produce the Übermensch, ‘a superman whose distance from the ordinary man was greater than the distance between man and ape’.8 Then a ‘super-race’ of such beings would impose its will on the weak and the worthless.
Decades later, Hitler would proclaim the same Darwinist superiority views to justify his own subjugation of the ‘lesser’ peoples of Europe.9
In the light of this attitude of racial superiority, it is interesting to compare probably the two most famous documents to come out of the Herero war. In his infamous Vernichtungsbefehl (annihilation order), von Trotha stated: “[E]very Herero, with or without a gun, with or without cattle, will be shot. I will no longer accept women and children, I will drive them back to their people or I will let them be shot at.”10
Lieutenant-General Lothar von Trotha’s beliefs of racial superiority led him to contemptuously state: “I wipe out rebellious tribes with streams of blood and streams of money. Only following this cleansing can something new emerge”. And “… I find it appropriate that the [Herero] nation perishes instead of infecting our soldiers”.
The response of the ‘lesser’ people
In contrast, a letter of Herero chief Samuel Maharero to his people shortly after the outbreak of war11 states that Englishmen, Boers, missionaries and people of other tribes were not to be harmed.12 History has shown that both instructions were diligently carried out.
In a decisive battle at Hamakari, near Waterberg, on 11 August 1904, von Trotha’s troops surrounded the Herero tribespeople on three sides and brutally defeated them. In a cynical ploy, he left open only the way into the Omaheke area of the Kalahari Desert. The battle plan was that those who escaped the German bullets should die of thirst. Waterholes for 150 miles (240 km) around the desert were either patrolled or poisoned, and those Herero who came crawling out of the Omaheke, desperate for water, were bayoneted. This left the Herero “with but one option: to cross the desert into Botswana [then called Bechuanaland], in reality a march to death. This, indeed, is how the majority of the Herero perished.”13
Due to missionary pressure and a growing shortage of labour in the colony, von Trotha’s extermination campaign was eventually stopped by Berlin, and the surviving Herero people were put into concentration camps. “Put to slave labor, overworked, hungry, and exposed to diseases such as typhoid and smallpox, more Herero men perished in these camps. Herero women, meanwhile, were turned into sex slaves.”14
The result of this policy was that from 1904 to 1908 the Herero were reduced “from a tribe of 80,000 persons to 15,000 starving refugees.”15
Following the war, all Herero persons over the age of seven were forced to wear a metal disc around their necks with their registration number, designating them as free labour. This was an ominous foretaste of the Jewish Holocaust star years later, when Hitler similarly enslaved those he considered to be members of inferior races.
Genocide and ‘race branding’
- Francis Galton, the anti-Christian cousin of Charles Darwin, visited South-West Africa in the early 1850s. He went on to develop his theory of eugenics, a term he coined in 1883. This pseudo-science helped promote the racial superiority views which played such a major role in the fate of the Herero people years later.
- Making his rounds of the Herero concentration camps was Herr Doktor Eugen Fischer. It was here that Fischer did his first ‘medical’ experiments on race, genetics and eugenics, using as his guinea pigs both Herero full-bloods and the mulatto offspring of Herero women and German men. Under his supervision, the preserved bodies and severed heads of Herero who had been hanged were sent to Germany for dissection.4
Fischer went on to become the head of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics. He co-authored the book The Principles of Human Heredity and Race Hygiene,17 which became the standard textbook in Germany on this subject. Hitler cited it in his Mein Kampf [My Struggle] , which became the basis for the destruction of millions of people in his own pursuit of ‘racial purity’.
Hitler appointed Fischer as rector of the University of Berlin in 1933, where he taught medicine to Nazi doctors. Fischer is sometimes referred to as the father of modern genetics. One of his prominent pupils was Josef Mengele, the so-called ‘Angel of Death’, who went on to repeat his teacher’s cruel experiments on Jewish children, and directed the operation of the gas chambers at Auschwitz.
- In his book When Victims Become Killers: Colonialism, Nativism, and the Genocide in Rwanda, Professor Mahmood Mamdani writes: “[T]here is a link that connects the genocide of the Herero and the Nazi Holocaust to the Rwandan genocide. That link is race branding, whereby it became possible not only to set a group apart as an enemy, but also to exterminate it with an easy conscience.”18
(An article in Creation magazine called ‘The evolution of the Hutu-Tutsi slayings’19 referred to the Rwanda massacres. It documented how Belgian theistic evolutionary occupiers had persuaded one of the tribes that they were superior, being ‘more highly evolved’.)
Clearly such ‘race branding’ as Mamdani refers to is based on belief in evolution and the idea that different races are at different stages of development in the ‘survival of the fittest’.
This belief has produced, as its logical offspring, the murder of tens of millions of innocent mothers, fathers, sons and daughters in the 20th century, beginning with the Herero genocide.
When the creation/gospel message that we are all closely-related descendants of Adam in need of a Saviour is rejected, there is, it seems, no limit to the evil that results. The remedy seems obvious.
‘I too travel to heaven in a wagon.’
In his book Herero Heroes, Jan-Bart Gewald describes the death of one of the Herero Christian leaders, as witnessed by a Rhenish missionary, Friedrich Meier.1
Weak from disease and maltreatment, Kukuri was transported to his execution on the back of an ox-cart. He did not show the slightest trace of fear, but instead looked as if he was going to a wedding! At one stage, he said to Meier, “Pastor, like Elijah, I too travel to heaven in a wagon.”2
When they arrived at the site, it was still being prepared. Meier feared for Kukuri’s tranquility and asked him to stop looking at the gallows. He replied, “Why should I not look at it? Is it not ‘my wood’ [my cross]?” The two of them prayed together that beautiful hymn, “So then take my hand and lead me”. Then Kukuri said, “It would appear that you still fear that I am afraid, but when a father calls his child, does that child then fear to go to him? Give my wife, who is in Okahandja, my greetings and tell her that I have died in the faith of the Lord Jesus; so too tell my children if you should ever see them.” He then said, “Lord Jesus, help me.”
Kukuri climbed the ladder and the rope was put around his neck. As he was falling, the noose slipped, so that he landed on the ground, unconscious. Two soldiers lifted him up and, on orders from the major in charge, shot him dead. Thus did Kukuri enter into the presence of his Lord.
References and notes
- Formerly the German and then South African Protectorate of South-West Africa, it achieved full independence in 1990 under the auspices of the United Nations. Return to text.
- Convened by German chancellor Otto von Bismarck for the purpose of dividing up the African continent and allocating its countries to the major European powers. Fourteen European nations were represented, but there was not one African representative at the conference. Return to text.
- Gewald, J.B., Herero Heroes, James Curry, Oxford, UK, p. 145, 1999. Return to text.
- Ref. 3, p. 173. Return to text.
- Ref. 3, p. 174. Return to text.
- See Grigg, R., Ernst Haeckel: Evangelist for evolution and apostle of deceit, Creation 18(2):33–36, 1996.; creation.com/haeckel. Return to text.
- Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) was a German philosopher noted for his vehement attacks on Christianity. Return to text.
- Encyclopaedia Britannica 24:938, 15th ed., 1992. Return to text.
- This is thoroughly documented in Weikart, R., From Darwin to Hitler, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2004. Return to text.
- Ref. 3, pp. 172–173. Return to text.
- This letter to his people was later claimed by the German occupiers, without basis, to have been written by him as a call to arms the day before the war broke out. Return to text.
- Ref. 3, p. 157. Return to text.
- Mamdani, M., When victims become killers: colonialism, nativism, and the genocide in Rwanda, Princeton University Press, USA, p. 11, 2001. [The author is Professor of Government and Director of the Institute of African Studies at Columbia University. Citing someone in support of a correct conclusion does not mean that we necessarily endorse that person’s views on other issues, even if related—Ed.] Return to text.
- Ref. 13, p. 12. Return to text.
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 8:494, 15th ed., 1992. Return to text.
- This theme has been explored in ref. 13. Return to text.
- German title: Menschliche Erblichkeitslehre und Rassenhygiene, co-authored with Edwin Baur and Fritz Lenz in 1921. ‘Race hygiene’ was the German equivalent of eugenics. Return to text.
- Ref. 13, p. 13. Return to text.
- Evolution of the Hutu-Tutsi slayings, Creation 21(2):47, March 1999. Return to text.
Just a brief note to Hans - Possibly the German stuff is easier to write about because we live in the Western world, (e.g Russian information is probably harder to come by, Chinese / Japanese even more so, etc) and because the US and UK were directly involved with fighting the evil. Documentation of these atrocities exist in all our countries, and it is material we are all familiar with in the English speaking world. it is "common ground" upon which teaching can be built. Further, the Nazi Germans were also quite scientific in their approach making it more relevant than most to CMI. Also, European, UK and US culture has vast similarities when compared to the rest of the world due to it's history (Biblical and otherwise) which makes it easier to engage in. Perhaps one last point is that with the rise of extremism and immigration issues in Europe/UK there are neo-Nazi's springing up in the UK, Germany, France etc. Thus, it is a contemporary, relevant subject where we can all meet with a degree of knowledge.
Spoken by a Welshman who loves Maultaschen and is married to a fine German lady :-)
A very timely and accurate article. There are many places during this period that this philosophy took root. I know that many people, even many Christians, became pursuaded of this mix of Darwin/Galtonism and driven by ownership of Malthusian economics to deceive themselves of this vicious 'brave new world'. In the Milne Bay Province of Papua New Guinea this same belief was held by many businessmen and some Government officials with regard to native land and their hopes of taking over the country. On Samarai Island there is a memorial to a provisional governor "In Memory of Christopher Robinson Able Governor, upright Judge and honest man. Died 20th June 1904 His aim was to make New Guinea a good country for the white man." The reason for his death was suicide owing to the exposure he was about to get for raising a 'posse' of businessmen from Port Moresby to conduct a punitive expedition against the Goaribari Islanders in the far western end of the country for killing and eating two white missionaries. This group poured rifle fire into villagers; a bloodbath that was only ended when the captain of the "Merrie England" bashed them over their heads with a piece of wood to stop the firing. The reason that the memorial was placed there was because the missionary Charles Abel, had protested so vociferously that the Australian authorities decided on a court of inquiry. Abel always said that missionaries are aware that they might have to pay the ultimate price with their lives. In this case the missionaries were James Chalmers and Oliver Tomkins from the London Missionary Society and ten native missionaries who were assisting them.
I wonder how many other similar events took place following faith in Darwin.
Will you write also about the Islamic slave hunters in Africa which left 50 M dead or the genocides in South America's Indians and then with the North American Indians or about Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot or about the genocides of the Roman Empire or the ancient China? And dozens more...
What about Korea or Vietnam? Why always Germany? It seems to excite.
Put most any of those suggested perpetrators and people's into our search engine and you will find articles on their roles in genocide and other atrocities based on a belief in Darwinian evolution. I myself have written on Stalin's Darwinian ideology and the pivotal role it played in his responsibility for more deaths than even the Nazis. And so the role Darwinian race science played in specifically the German nation is not a focus of our ministry at all. Atrocities in the name of Darwin carried out in your country Australia are also well documented in our literature. In fact, the historical record shows that this mindset was not distinctly nor innately German. It was the consequence of a 'weltanschauung' shared by much of the western world but put into it's most efficient practice by the Nazis in WWII, after which evolutionists all over the world withdrew from the racist implications of their belief system which they had hitherto supported.