Evidence for a young earth and biblical history.

Is our authority God’s Word or secular uniformitarian ‘science’? Taking the Bible ‘seriously’ means taking it as God’s Word according to its original meaning.

A critic claims that geologists are not biased when it comes to interpreting the age of the earth.

Would volcanic dust and ash block the sunlight? And would salt cover the continents?

Should creationists stick with their views no matter what the evidence says?

Does the Bible really teach that there is one God in three Persons?

Should Christians embrace teachings from other religions?

Earth’s magnetic field decay, combined with rapid reversals during the Flood, is good evidence for a young world. But now one secular co-author of the rapid reversal papers has retracted.

A correspondent asks, ‘What if you get to heaven and Jesus tells you that you were wrong?’

What is it? And is it evidence against the Bible’s age of the earth?

But it does not help the origin-of-life problem; it’s still impossible.

Is God’s definition of ‘good’ arbitrary?