Do these controversial finds provide a good argument against deep time?

A correspondent asks for help defending the argument from reason against critics.

How can Jesus be God if he does not know what the Father knows?

Is disagreement of other worldviews disrespectful and what’s love got to do with it?

We respond to a list of skeptical arguments against the Bible and Christianity.

We show how naturalism can’t sufficiently explain the miracles.

Radiometric dating methods often give wrong dates for rocks. Some critics argue that creationists shouldn’t point this out, because the methods should not have been used in the first place.

An evolutionist challenges creationists to look at what he considers is strong evidence for his position: different modes of birth among otherwise related creatures.

And do various biblical miracles have the same problem?

We tackle a sensitive and controversial question.

Evolutionists promote an ‘evidence-first’ approach, but fail to see that their own philosophical evolutionary bias blinds them to evidence for the God of the Bible.

Biblical creation deals with the relation between historical science and miracles, which methodological naturalism ignores before considering the evidence.