Share
A- A A+

Article from:

Creation  Volume 18Issue 1 Cover

Creation 18(1):51
December 1995

Free Email News
Creation magazine print - 1 yr new subn


US $25.00
View Item
The Creation Answers Book
by Various

US $9.00
View Item
frame top left frame top frame top right
frame left
Creation Magazine Volume 18 Issue 1 CoverFirst published:
Creation 18(1):51
December 1995
frame right
frame bottom leftframe bottomframe bottom right

The 'werewolf' gene
A reawakening gene of human evolution, or a harmful mutation?

by Thomas Awtry

The general public is bombarded with evolutionary propaganda through television, radio, magazines, and newspapers. A good example of such was found in a recent newspaper article by Associated Press science writer Malcolm Ritter, 'Scientists move closer to finding "werewolf" gene'.1

The article describes a very rare condition of excessive hairiness which is not known to afflict anybody outside a large family in rural Mexico. Some newborn males are born with hair all over their face, including the eyelids, with only the lips remaining hairless. Men with the condition have inch-long hair all over their face, and on some parts of their upper body. Women with the condition, while not being affected to the same degree as the men, have random patches of hair on the face and on the body.

According to the article, scientists have moved closer to finding the gene, which someday may help treat baldness and excessive hairiness. Readers are then informed that the werewolf condition 'comes from an aberrant gene that runs through their large family, perhaps after reawakening from a long sleep during human evolution'. The last phrase speaks volumes: this hairiness condition is said to be a leftover trait from our alleged ape-type ancestry.

As is true of several evolution-creation topics of discussion, the difference lies not in the data under consideration, but rather in the interpretation of the data. While it is true that an aberrant gene now runs in the one family, it does not therefore mean that it is a 'reawakening' effect of 'human evolution'. Another interpretation which is just as viable is that it is simply a mutated gene. The mutation changed the amount of a physical feature (hairiness) of humans which has existed in humans from their initial creation. This may be from damage to a gene controlling hair growth or its distribution.

And as creationists have been saying for years about all mutations, this random mutation is harmful, if anything. The article reveals how much the individuals with the trait suffer, and how most become outcasts of society, often becoming members of sideshows for a travelling circus. It is possible then that this condition might become even more rare as selection works against these individuals. Of course, this supports the creationists' explanation, but not the evolutionary explanation. Remember, Darwinian evolution requires mutations to be favourable and cumulative, increasing viability.

Another physical phenomenon which some evolutionists have claimed in the past as evidence of evolutionary ancestry is when a child is born with a 'tail'. The 'tail', however, is really not a tail or part of the coccyx, but is rather a fatty tumour.2 The lesson to be learned, though, is that no one now claims it to be due to a 'reawakening' of human evolution.

We can learn several lessons from the article:

  1. Sometimes there is more than one interpretation of data.

  2. Evidence suggests mutations to be random and detrimental. And because

  3. Evolution must have favourable, 'uphill' mutations, and many of them, therefore

  4. Evolution, like werewolves, is a myth.

Thomas H. Awtry, Ph.D.
Dr Awtry has studied creation/ evolution issues for about 10 years, and has taught adults and children about the young age of the earth, fossils, dinosaurs, and related scientific evidence for the existence of God the Creator and for the inspiration of the Bible. He lives in Louisiana in the United States.

References

  1. Malcolm Ritter, Scientists move closer to finding 'werewolf' gene, The Advocate, Baton Rouge (Louisiana), 1 June 1995.
  2. H.M. Morris and G.E. Parker, What is Creation Science?, Master Books, El Cajon (California), 1987.

Where are you while reading this article? In the privacy of your own home? The internet, and this site in particular, can be a powerful tool for reaching those who would never go to church. Keep the penetration going by supporting this outreach. Support this site

Copied to clipboard
1034
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.