Share
A- A A+

Article from:

Creation  Volume 35Issue 1 Cover

Creation 35(1):32–33
January 2013

Free Email News
The Age of the Earth DVD
by Dr. Tas Walker

US $13.00
View Item
Biblical Geology: Properly Understanding the Rocks DVD
by Dr Tas Walker

US $13.00
View Item
Footprints in the Ash


US $17.00
View Item
Geology by Design
by Carl R. Froede Jr.

US $15.00
View Item
Rock Solid Answers
by Mike Oard and John Reed

US $20.00
View Item
Thousands … Not Billions
by Dr Don DeYoung

US $14.00
View Item

Parícutin

A Mountain in a Year

by

Parícutin

©iStockPhoto.com/tankbmb

IN 1943, a Mexican farmer was working in a field with his wife and son when he was astonished to see a small fissure suddenly open up in the ground in front of him. The trio were then rocked by a thunderous roar which shook the trees. The soil around the fissure bulged upwards 2 metres (6½ feet), the crack gaped wide open, and ash began blasting out. An horrific wailing or whistling sound commenced, building in intensity, and the air was quickly filled with dark ‘smoke’ and acrid vapours smelling of rotting eggs (hydrogen sulfide H2S). It was as if the end of the world had begun.

In the farmer’s own words: “I then became greatly frightened … I couldn’t find my wife, or my son, or my animals. At last I came to my senses and I remembered the sacred Lord of the Miracles. I shouted out ‘Blessed Lord of the Miracles, you brought me into this world—now save me!’ … I looked into the fissure where the smoke was rising and my fear disappeared for the first time … I mounted my mare and galloped to [the village of] Parícutin where I found my wife and son and friends waiting for me. They were afraid that I was dead and that they would never see me again.”1

A volcano begins

The farmer’s name was Dionisio Pulido, and he had just witnessed, with his wife Paula, the birth of a completely new volcano. The volcano came to be known as Parícutin, after his village. Within hours of Dionisio’s narrow escape, a dark ‘scoria’2 cone began rising ominously from the field, and in a week it had grown to 100 metres (over 300 feet) high. Lava started to flow soon afterwards, and in a month the volcano was a major feature that could be seen from far away. It continued to grow bigger still, and the villages of Parícutin and San Juan Parangaricutiro were destroyed.

No one was killed directly by the lava flows or hot ash but three people died after being hit by lightning caused by the pyroclastic ash clouds. Thousands of farm animals perished. The size and impact of the new volcano was so great that the people and animals from the villages and farms all around had to be permanently moved to a new locality.

Stefan Cruysberghs www.scip.be

Parícutin-volcano

Mount Parícutin

In modern times, there have been many eruptions of pre-existing, once-dormant volcanoes, but Dionisio’s mountain is especially notable because its very beginning had eyewitnesses. It was also the first time that scientists were able to observe the complete lifecycle of a volcano. Parícutin reached the height of 336 metres (1,100 feet) in the first year, and when it ceased erupting in 1952 it had grown to be 424 metres (1,390 feet) high above the plain (elevation (i.e. above sea level) is 2,800 m (9,186 ft)). It is now considered to be extinct.3 What began as a tiny crack in the ground, right before the eyes of an amazed farmer, is today a major geographical feature called one of the seven natural wonders of the world, and attracting tourists and climbers from far and wide.

Millions of years not needed

Most of the world’s major geologic features did not have human witnesses to their formation.4 Uniformitarian scientists have inferred what happened in the past in the light of their long-age philosophy. They assert that most geological features took many thousands or millions of years to form. Yet we know from actual eyewitness testimony that Mount Parícutin took only 9 years to form, from beginning to extinction, with most of its growth having occurred in the first year. With much larger forces at work in the earth’s crust, as occurred during the terrible year of the global Flood, even the largest geographical features we see in the world today would have formed in months, weeks or even days.

Parícutin has a cone shape and is called a Strombolian volcano. Volcanoes that formed during Noah’s Flood, 4,500 years ago, would have been planed flat by the rising waters. Those that erupted late in the Flood would have been severely eroded, with the exception of their solid neck, by the receding floodwaters. For instance the Glass House Mountains north of Brisbane, Australia, are the remnant necks of volcanoes that erupted late in the Flood.5 So if we see volcanoes today with cones intact, such as Mount Fuji, Japan, we know that they formed in the post-Flood era.

Related Articles

References and notes

  1. The eruption of Parícutin (1943–1952), geology.sdsu.edu, parentheses added, accessed 25-5-12. Return to text.
  2. Rough fragments of hardened, cindery lava ejected from a volcanic vent. Return to text.
  3. Volcanoes that are considered unlikely to erupt again are commonly called ‘extinct’. According to uniformitarian orthodoxy, extinct volcanoes are usually considered to have last erupted during a supposed prehistory, millions of years ago. Return to text.
  4. Even Noah, aboard the Ark, could not see what was happening beneath the surface of the floodwaters. Of course, having been informed by God, and knowing what the world was like both before and after the Flood, Noah would have been very aware of the vast magnitude of change that had occurred in the world. Return to text.
  5. Walker, T., Looking into the Glass House Mountains, Australia, Creation, 31(4):54–55, 2009, creation.com/glass-house-mountains-australia. Return to text.

Long before this site existed, many millions searched on the word “creation”. When they do that now they will get to know this site exists and read the evidence that God is Creator. Help reach millions. Support this site

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
Readers’ comments
Nic G., Australia, 1 February 2014

Has any radiometric dating been carried out at the site? That'd make for some confronting results.

Tas Walker responds

I'm not aware of any, but that would be a good project for someone to arrange.

Damien S., Australia, 1 February 2014

How old is Mount Paricutan according to the dating methods used by evolutionists? It's likely they haven't even bothered to test because they know it will be wrong. If it's formation wasn't so well documented, would they claiming millions of years? Absolutely!!

Tas Walker responds

It would be worth someone doing some dating on it.

Lachlan R., Australia, 1 February 2014

This is amazing! If no one ever witnessed the birth and rapid growth of that volcano, I might consider this as fiction. That must of have that poor farmer and his family a massive fright!

S. K., Australia, 1 February 2014

Makes me wonder if a rock was taken from this volcano and another taken from an older volcano and radiometric dating methods applied would they show different ages? Or has this been done already? Just wondering if the results would help bring someone to repentance and faith in CHRIST.

Tas Walker responds

There have been tests done on other historic volcanic rocks, and some of those are reported on this site.

Brian W., United States, 1 February 2014

Do you know if any of the volcanic rocks from this volcano have been "dated" with radio-isotope methods since these have a known age? What would be the expected results from such dating with rocks so young?

Tas Walker responds

I don't know of any measurements that have been made (but a literature search may turn up some). I would expect K-Ar or Ar-Ar dating would give results from low ages up to a few million years.

peter H., United Kingdom, 2 February 2014

might they just squirm out of an unfavourable reading by claiming it was of pre-existing material that had been thrust upward?. that was tried on me once on a mudcat thread. I countered by saying any new rock was derived from something previous. hope that was right!

Tas Walker responds

There are lots of ways that are used to explain the results of radioisotope methods. See Ways they make conflicting resultes tell the same story.

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
Copied to clipboard
189
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.