Frequently asked questions listed by topic
Radiometric Dating Questions and Answers
What is radiocarbon dating? Is it accurate?
Are there examples of inaccurate results obtained from the potassium/argon dating
method (the most cited method)?
How can the radiometric dates of millions and billions of years old be so wrong?
- The way it really is: little-known facts about radiometric
dating (available in Spanish)
- Dating doubt
-
Excessively old ‘ages’ For Grand Canyon lava flows (Semi-Technical,
ICR Impact)
-
Dubious radiogenic Pb behavior places U-Th-Pb mineral dating in doubt
(Semi-Technical, ICR Impact)
- The Failure of U-Th-Pb ‘Dating’ at Koongarra
(Technical)
- The
Dating Game (Semi-Technical — True Origins site)
- Flaws in dating the earth as ancient
-
Radioactive age estimation methods — Do they prove the earth is billions of
years old? (Christian Answers Network)
- Conflicting ‘ages’ of Tertiary
basalt and contained fossilised wood, Crinum, Central Queensland, Australia
(Technical, PDF)
- Radioactive ‘Dating’ in Conflict! (popular
article based on above technical paper)
- Tree ring dating (dendrochronology) [and does it
reliably calibrate carbon-14 dating?] (available in Spanish)
- National Geographic magazine joins the dating
game
- Is the absence of short-lived radionuclides a problem
for the Biblical timescale
(Semi-Technical, reply to critic)
- (My chemistry prof.) Out of his depth on radioactive
dating
(Letter from supporter, includes reply)
- Evolutionist debater fails to understand young-earth
arguments
(Letter from supporter about a debate opponent, includes refution of opponent)
- The Oklo natural reactors in Precambrian rocks, Gabon, Africa
Is there any evidence that radioactive decay rate might not have
been constant?
What is the current creationist thinking on radiohalos (formerly
called ‘pleochroic halos’)?
| Besides the many thousands of articles that are freely available on this site, our staff answer many hundreds of emails in response to it. Help us help advance the gospel.  | | |
|