Share
A- A A+
Free Email News
Is Human Life Special?
by Gary Bates and Lita Cosner

US $3.50
View Item
Life Before Birth
by Gary E Parker

US $13.00
View Item
Bioethics


US $13.00
View Item
Bioethics


US $6.50
View Item

Norma McCorvey, 1947–2017

Norma-McCorvey

Norma McCorvey, 1947–2017

by

Published: 23 February 2017 (GMT+10)

The woman most famous as the “Roe” of Roe v. Wade, the US Supreme Court decision that struck down state abortion bans in the United states in 1973, died on 18 February 2017 at 69 years old.1 Though famous for her role in legalizing abortion nation-wide, she never had an abortion herself. She attempted to secure an illegal abortion while experiencing an unwanted pregnancy, but gave birth and the child was adopted. She later converted to Roman Catholicism and became an advocate for the pro-life cause, stating that her participation in Roe v. Wade was one of the worst decisions of her life.

Prior to Roe, the states decided whether abortions were legal, and under what circumstances. Along with the ‘sister case’ Doe v. Bolton, the US Supreme Court effectively made abortion legal up to birth.

The law isn’t the biggest issue!

Many people oppose Roe, and for good reason. But looking at another bad Supreme Court decision that targeted vulnerable people, we can see that the law is not the real issue.

The biggest problem is that our society does not see unborn children as valuable human beings with rights.

Buck v. Bell is the infamous Supreme Court decision that legalized the involuntary sterilization of people judged to be mentally handicapped or ‘feebleminded’ on eugenic grounds. Tens of thousands of American citizens were sterilized as a result, some as late as the 1970s. It might shock people to know that this court decision remains in effect today. This law never changed! Yet we don’t see mentally handicapped people being sterilized involuntarily today—why? Because we began to see the mentally handicapped as people with value and rights, and that subjecting them to sterilization without consent violates those rights.

The biggest problem is not that the law allows unborn children to be killed for any reason up to birth—the biggest problem is that our society does not see unborn children as valuable human beings with rights, and that killing them violates these rights.

The Gospel is the answer!

The Bible teaches that all human beings are image-bearers of God. This means that from conception onward, we have value in the Creator’s eyes. Unborn children are not valuable primarily because they might become cancer researchers or violin virtuosos. The unborn future garbage man, or the unborn child with Down Syndrome, has as much value in God’s eyes as the unborn future astronaut.

Also, Scripture teaches that from conception onward, we carry the taint of sin from our forefather, Adam. David affirms that he was sinful from his mother’s womb (Psalm 51:5). While it might seem strange to cite the sinfulness of the unborn child as a pro-life argument, it shows that the child is already part of the human family, sharing both the privilege of image-bearing and the problem of sinfulness.

Human beings are ultimately valuable, from conception to natural death, because we are image-bearers of a holy God, and He has assigned value to us.

Since the unborn child is a human image-bearer of God, Scripture forbids killing the child as murder. In fact, harming an unborn child, even unintentionally, was judged in ancient Israel (Exodus 21:22), and sacrificing infants to Molech was one of the most abhorrent practices in God’s sight (Exodus 20:2–5; Jeremiah 32:35).

This means that when a woman has an abortion, she and the abortionist are cooperating to murder her child. To some people, this may seem unloving to say, especially because many women come to regret their abortions and suffer emotionally as a result. But only when we correctly point out that this sin has occurred can we bring the Gospel to bear to help women (and the fathers of their children) who may be hurting because of their past decisions.

Women who have had abortions, and the people around them who enabled them, can find forgiveness and peace by trusting in Jesus for the forgiveness of their sins. His sacrificial death paid the penalty for the sins of everyone who would come to Him, and His resurrection from the dead assures us that we too will be raised to newness of life with Him.

Defend the sanctity of life from a creation foundation!

Human beings are ultimately valuable, from conception to natural death, because we are image-bearers of a holy God, and He has assigned value to us. But we can only defend this truth from a foundation of biblical creation, because Genesis teaches that we are created in the image of God, and the other Scriptures that teach this truth assume the authority of Genesis. So as we have seen with so many other cultural issues, ultimately abortion is a symptom of a bigger problem of the rejection of biblical authority.

Related Articles

Further Reading

References and notes

  1. Roe v. Wade: Woman in US abortion legal test case dies, bbc.com, 18 February 2017. Return to text.

6,000 years of earth history. That's a long time in our opinion! Over 10,000 free web articles on creation.com. That's a lot of information! Take advantage of this free information but please support CMI as God provides. Thank you. Support this site

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
Readers’ comments
Dennis S., United States, 3 March 2017

Any country that refuses to protect its most innocent, defenseless and voiceless will eventually prove itself untrustworthy of protecting everyone. Ultimately, everyone [save for the evil elites] will be next.

Nathan G., Germany, 24 February 2017

The irony is so thick that you can't cut it with a chainsaw. Nor do you know whether to laugh or cry at the sheer idiocy of the liberal situation facing all Western nations today.

A woman who never had an abortion, but later wholeheartedly endorses the exact opposite point-of-view is still used (but never retracted) as a poster-child puppet by the liberal, death-as-salvation camp. Astoundingly, all pro-abortionists were born and can vote for the conditions of their own lives outside the womb! Perhaps future genetic research can stop this. (Only a joke!)

So the Roe vs. Wade debacle, in which all 50 States were arbitrarily overruled in their sovereign decisions (based on the US Constitution's division of powers), is nothing more than judicial law by fiat. This is absolutely illegal based on two things: 1) the US Judiciary is forbidden from legislating and 2) it is a non-elected body of political busybodies who can be - BUT NEVER ARE!!! - impeached by the US Congress. Why not? Because the majority of Congress is also worldly in its view.

Good thing that we are no longer sterilizing "unwanteds" for their "bad" traits (the Nazis copied our US eugenics program in Germany!), since we might just have to administer the same sentence to the children of Baby Boomer generation liberals in power today. (another joke, oh you humorless ones!) Let's see how that idea floats among the movers and shakers of our land...

Martyn M., Australia, 24 February 2017

Its like a light switched on for me. Its not the law that is the major problem we need to tackle in regard to abortion "the biggest problem is that our society does not see unborn children as valuable human beings". Lets focus on changing peoples views on the unborn child. Undoubtedly what the law says also affects peoples moral perceptions.

Terry W., Canada, 24 February 2017

I hate to see you go, Mrs. McCorvey. Death even of the old and repentant is still tragic (see John 11:35 and context).

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
Copied to clipboard
11870
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.