Teaching creationism is child abuse? (Part 2)Dr Lawrence Krauss calls teaching creationism to children 'child abuse'. He wants to censor any science that contradicts his beliefs about atheism and evolution over millions of years. However, he doesn't seem to grasp foundational philosophical and scientific concepts. Teaching lies to children is wrong because there is a moral law that says lying is wrong. But if atheism is true then there can be no moral law other than people's own opinions.Video14 Aug, 201305:40
Evolution's Achilles' Heels - Producers ChatAn interview with the producers who also play some short snippets from the upcoming documentaryVideo12 Aug, 201313:45
Teaching creationism is child abuse? (Part 1)Dr Lawrence Krauss calls teaching creationism to children 'child abuse'. He wants to censor any conclusions that contradict his beliefs about atheism and evolution over millions of years. However, he doesn't seem to grasp foundational aspects of the origins debate. Teaching lies to children is wrong. They need to be taught the truth about the world around us and what life is all about.Video07 Aug, 201307:06
The Voyage that shook the World - Galápagos finchesThe above video clip is an extract from the DVD The Voyage that shook the World - https://creation.com/s/30-9-543 [https://creation.com/s/30-9-543]. The Galápagos finches are commonly cited as a prime example of evolution; indeed, the example that allegedly inspired Darwin's theory. Darwin postulated that all the varieties of finches, with varying beaks suited for their different food sources, were all descended from the same sort of finch and the different varieties of finch arose over time. This was actually reasonable. Suppose some finches with the genetic information for a wide variety of beaks came to the islands in a storm, and that some were on an island where the main food source was hard seeds. Birds with genes for thick and strong beaks could cope with them better, so would be better fed, and thus more likely to leave offspring. But birds on an island with few seeds but lots of grubs would do better with longer and thinner beaks, so they could poke deeper into the ground and pull out their prey. This is indeed an example of adaptation and natural selection. But note that it actually removes genes from the populations—on seed-rich islands with few grubs, information for long, slender beaks would likely be lost; while the information for thick, strong beaks would be lost on grub-rich (seed-poor) islands. So this change is in the opposite direction from goo-to-you evolution, which requires new genes with new information. It can hardly be over-emphasized: natural selection is not evolution.Video02 Aug, 201302:28
Revelation or reasoning, which is better?God has given us a brain, tools and rules of reasoning like logic and created us in His image as rational beings. He has also given us revelation of who He is, what has happened in the past and what will happen in the future. But if there is a conflict between man's interpretation of evidence and God's revelation, what should have more authority? Man's reasoning or the revelation of the one who gave man his ability to reason?Video31 Jul, 201314:49
Is there a universal way Christians should interpret the Bible?Some say that that there really isn't a standard for interpreting the Bible and that all interpretations are simply the creation of man. But if that's true then how can we know anything in the Bible for certain? Is there a universal way that the Bible should be read, and if so, what is it?Video24 Jul, 201320:13
The Ice Age and the BibleWhat is the evidence for it? Where does it fit into Biblical history? What caused it? Tune into this weeks' episode for the answers.Video03 Jul, 201328:28
Apes and Humans: 99% similar?Is ape and human DNA really 99% similar? What is the evidence that ape chromosome 2 fusion led to human DNA? Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss these and other issues relating to human evolution this week on Creation Magazine LIVE!Many people believe humans evolved from and apelike ancestor, but science disagrees: we were created!Video26 Jun, 201328:25
Transitional fossils? Where?The 'missing links'—hailed as proof for evolution—are examined and debunked.Video19 Jun, 201328:24