Bombardier idea
by David Catchpoole
The bombardier beetle uses its rear-end
‘cannon’ to fire a high-pressure jet of boiling irritating liquid at an
attacking predator. It is much more sophisticated than an army cannon, though, as the
bombardier beetle fires its explosive discharges at around 500 pulses per
second!1,2
The jet of mainly water/steam fires repeatedly out through nozzles at a stunning 20 metres (65 ft) per second.
|
The mechanism is highly complex, but put simply, the
bombardier rapidly mixes two chemicals (hydrogen peroxide and hydroquinone) and injects
them into a heart-shaped combustion chamber which contains mainly water.3 The beetle then
injects a third chemical (catalase) which greatly speeds up the normally mild reaction to
explosive force. The jet of mainly water/steam fires repeatedly out through nozzles at a
stunning 20 metres (65 ft) per second.
Photo by Patrick Coin
|
Now it seems that the bombardier’s explosive secrets
could inspire engineers to design better aircraft engines.4 The process is similar to the
pulse combustion technique that powered Germany’s V1 flying bombs during World War
II. The bombardier beetle attains far greater pulse efficiency, though. How?
‘It’s become evident that the dimensions of the chamber and the nozzle coming
out of the back are crucial’, Andy McIntosh,
professor of Thermodynamics and Combustion Theory at the University of Leeds, told New
Scientist.4
In mimicking the bombardier’s remarkable combustion
mechanism, Professor McIntosh hopes that the high ejection efficiency of the 1 mm
(0.04 inch) beetle combustion chamber can be scaled up for reigniters in aircraft
engines. (These small devices shoot charged chemicals into the engine if it stops at high
altitude.) But the beetle’s unique combustion process cannot be duplicated merely
by copying the dimensions of the bombardier’s explosion chamber: ‘In reality
the combustion involved is complicated by the catalytic processes associated with the
muscle lining of the chamber.’5
It just goes to show that all the intricate machinery that God has designed in nature is far more complicated than man’s
|
Nevertheless, Professor McIntosh believes that the lessons
learnt by studying the bombardier beetle’s secrets could lead to innovative design
breakthroughs, with such novel ignition devices.6 Earlier researchers1 found
that the beetle precisely times the opening and closing of the inlet valve to its
combustion chamber to avoid blowing itself up. It also seems to be able to control the
pressure and direction of the resulting jet with pinpoint accuracy—at a bird, frog
or other predator.
It just goes to show that all the intricate machinery that
God has designed in nature is far more complicated than man’s—a fact
Professor McIntosh, with many years of engineering research experience, readily
acknowledges. ‘They can even repair and reproduce themselves’, he says.7
‘So how much more do they declare “his eternal power and divine nature”
(Romans 1:20)!’
References and notes
- Dean, J., Aneshansley, D.J., Edgerton, H.E. and Eisner, T., Defensive spray of the
Bombardier Beetle: a biological pulse jet, Science
248(4960):1219–1221, 1990.
- Armitage, M.H. and Mullisen, L., Preliminary observations of the
pygidial gland of the Bombardier Beetle, Brachinus sp., Journal of Creation 17(1):95–102,
2003.
- The reaction is C6H4(OH)2 +
H2O2 → C6H4O2 (quinone)
+
2H2O, producing a boiling water solution of quinones. This is hotter
than
100ºC, because of the dissolved substances and higher pressure.
- NewScientist.com, Beetle’s jet may inspire new engines,
<www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994461>, 24 December 2003.
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Beetle jet—studying a
species of beetle could lead to advances in combustion, EPSRC Newsline, Summer
2003, p. 02.
- The UK’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council has given a
three-year research grant to Professor McIntosh to fund the numerical modelling of the
bombardier beetle’s combustion device, and to investigate possible biomimetic
applications (whereby one ‘copies’ designs in nature for useful engineering
purposes).
- McIntosh,
A., 100 years of
airplanes—but these weren’t the first flying machines! Creation
26(1):44–48, 2003.
| Give $5 for 5. Although this article may have only taken 5 minutes to read, it could have taken over 5 hours to write. Consider a $5 donation to support our ministry efforts.  | | |
|