Share 0
Share
A- A A+

Article from:

Creation  Volume 37Issue 4 Cover

Creation 37(4):34–37
October 2015

Free Email News
The Genesis Account
by Jonathan Sarfati

US $35.00
View Item
By Design
by Dr Jonathan Sarfati

US $15.00
View Item
God the Master Designer


US $10.00
View Item
One Small Speck to Man, 2nd edition
by Vij Sodera

US $65.00
View Item
Evolution: The Grand Experiment, Teacher
by Dr Carl Werner

US $17.00
View Item
If Animals Could Talk
by Dr Werner Gitt

US $10.00
View Item
Without Excuse
by Dr Werner Gitt

US $15.00
View Item
Discovery of Design
by Donald DeYoung & Derrik Hobbs

US $14.00
View Item
Exploring the World of Biology
by John Hudson Tiner

US $14.00
View Item
Exploring Creation with Zoology 2: Student's Journal
by Jeannie Fulbright

US $16.00
View Item
Creatures Do Change But It's Not Evolution


US $10.00
View Item
The Greatest Hoax on Earth?
by Dr Jonathan Sarfati

US $15.00
View Item
Refuting Evolution
by Jonathan Sarfati

US $10.00
View Item
Refuting Evolution 2, updated
by Jonathan Sarfati

US $13.00
View Item
Evolution's Achilles' Heels
by Nine Ph.D. scientists

US $14.00
View Item

Cats big and small

by

cuddle

Cats are reckoned to be “the most popular pet in the world”, with more than 600 million living among people worldwide, despite the fact that they “contribute virtually nothing in the way of sustenance or work to human endeavour.”1 This helps explain why there is much less variation in domestic cats than in dogs. The diversity of canine sizes, shapes, and temperaments reflects the fact that people have long selected and bred dogs for such tasks as guarding, herding, hunting, and sled-pulling. Cats on the other hand, which according to Scientific American, “do not take instruction well”,1 have not been subjected to the same selective breeding pressures. While domestic dogs can look completely distinct from their ‘ancestral wolf’ form, many house cats are hard to distinguish from the wildcat2—with which they readily interbreed, and share the same species name, Felis silvestris.

hybridization-network
Figure 1: Hybridization network in the cat family. The smallest to largest can be linked by interbreeding as follows: Domestic cats can be crossed with the 3–9 kg margay, Leopardus weidii, which readily interbreeds with the 11–16 kg ocelot, Leopardus pardalus, which has been crossed with the puma (35–100 kg), Puma concolor, which has been hybridized with the leopard (30–85 kg), Panthera pardus, which can be crossed with the lion (120–250 kg), Panthera leo, which can readily interbreed with the tiger, Panthera tigris, with adult tigers ranging from 110 kg to a massive 320 kg. (Diagram simplified after Pendragon and Winkler, 20113)

How many cats on the Ark?

©Charles R. Knight/National Geographic smilodon
Figure 2: The extinct ‘dagger-tooth’ Smilodon popu­lator is most famous for its giant upper canines, hence its popular name ‘sabre-toothed tiger’. However, while it is in the family Felidae, it is not in the same subfamily as tigers (Pantherinae), but is in the subfamily Machairo-dontinae. Although we can’t hybridize extinct creatures, we do know that living members of Felidae can hybridize (see Figure 1), so it seems likely that extinct felids could likewise have hybridized.

All the cat species alive today can interbreed, even between genera and subfamilies of the family Felidae. So this suggests that all living members of Felidae descended from a pair of one original cat (‘felid’) kind that Noah took on the Ark (see Figure 1).

Many people know that cats were worshipped as gods in Egypt, but that was not where they were originally tamed. Based on DNA similarity, researchers say that all domestic cats are descended from a small family of cats “living on the banks of the Tigris and Euphrates.”4,5 It was there that cats first began “to take advantage of the mice and food scraps” near human settlement.1 It is also the general area where Noah’s descendants settled after the Flood (Genesis 11:2).

The Middle Eastern wildcat is anecdotally less flighty and more tolerant of humans than other wildcat subspecies. Scientific American noted: “in the lingo of evolutionary biology, natural selection favoured those cats that were able to cohabit with humans and thereby gain access to the trash and mice.”1 Actually, natural selection has nothing to do with ‘evolutionary biology’, because natural selection is simply a favouring of a subset of existing genetic information. In contrast, the supposed evolution pathway from primordial cell to Persian cats, pumas and panthers requires an increase in genetic information.6,7

Did you select your ‘household mouse exterminator’ or did it select you?

Cats were almost certainly ‘kept around’ by people initially because of their incredible hunting instinct. Killing mice and other pests would have been a tremendous benefit. However, this function did not require them to work closely with ‘their’ humans, as dogs did when they were domesticated, so they were not domesticated to the extent that dogs were.

Though often aloof, cats can be irresistibly affectionate to people they like. And examples abound of the incredible loyalty of cats towards the people in their household—e.g. the oft-viewed videoclip of the seven-year-old Californian boy being rescued from a savage dog attack by his pet cat ‘Tara’.8

cheetah
The cheetah is a big cat in the subfamily Felinae that inhabits most of Africa and parts of Iran. It is the only surviving member of the genus Acinonyx. It has a top speed of 120 km/h (75 mph), making it the fastest land animal.

A vegetarian carnivore?

Normally, cats are ‘hypercarnivorous’, though they do need greens as part of a balanced diet (which is normally included in cat food). They normally cannot survive on plants alone, and may become very ill if they are fed a vegan diet, as they cannot synthesize their own vitamin D, arachidonic acid (needed for wound healing), and taurine (maintenance of the retina, and heart function). Cats can become very ill, suffer eye problems, or even die if they do not eat animal-based food.

tongue
The cats’ tongue has backward-facing spines known as papillae. These allow cats to groom themselves by licking their fur, with the papillae functioning like a hairbrush.
felines-paw
All felines are capable of walking very precisely when stalking their prey, e.g. by placing each hind paw directly in the place trodden by the corresponding forepaw, providing surety of footing and minimizing noise. Having retractable claws sheathed within the skin and fur of the paw’s toe pads also aids silent stalking, and helps keep the claws sharp.
cat-nap
The term ‘cat nap’ likely derives from house cats being seen to fall asleep for a brief time. But in fact cats sleep for an average of 14 hours per day—even up to 20 hours in a 24-hour period. With cats’ proclivity for sleeping, Noah was likely not much troubled by his pair of felines during the sojourn on the Ark.

This makes cats who refuse to eat meat altogether even more remarkable. A two-year-old British pet cat called ‘Dante’ was reported to be exclusively (and resolutely) vegetarian.9,10 And there have been at least two famous big cats, ‘Little Tyke—the lion that wouldn’t eat meat’ and ‘Lea, spaghetti lioness’, being exclusively vegetarian.11,12,13 However, the Bible tells us that cats were originally created vegetarian (Genesis 1:30) and it also speaks of a time when “the lion will eat straw like the ox” (Isaiah 11:7, 65:25). In that light, today’s instances in nature of vegetarianism, altruism and other evolutionary anomalies can instead be much more readily understood as ‘echoes’ of a formerly “very good” creation (Genesis 1:31). A creation now in serious “bondage to decay” (Romans 8:19–22), where even ‘9-lives’ cats suffer mutations (see Cat mutation).

One leading creationist thinker10 has suggested vegetarian-capable cats might be examples of ‘reverse mutations’14 restoring the feline ability to synthesize the needed body components from the raw materials ingested as plant material, thus removing the ‘drive’ to eat meat.15 Far from supporting an evolutionary story of origins, cats big and small actually demonstrate in many ways the truth of the Bible—God’s Word.

Dave Hoover CC-BY-2.0 (cropped for publication) creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ tapetum-lucidum
Cats’ eyes have a tapetum lucidum—a layer of tissue behind the retina—which reflects light passing through the retina back into the eye, improving the eye’s sensitivity in dim light. This and other features give cats excellent night vision—they are able to see at only one-sixth of the light level required for human vision. The tapetum is retroreflective: light is reflected back in the same direction, so image sharpness and contrast is not compromised. The ‘cat’s eye’ retroreflective road markers were modelled on this, an early (1933) example of biomimetics.

Cats glorify the Creator—the God of the Bible

In the Bible, God uses big cats—primarily lions—to make several important teaching points, e.g., to highlight David’s selfless courage (1 Samuel 17:34–37), and even as agents of God’s judgment (2 Kings 17:24–25). There are over a hundred references to big cats in Scripture; some speak of power (e.g. Proverbs 20:2, Hosea 13:7), others of uncommon restraint (Daniel 6, 1 Kings 13:28). How wonderfully emblematic of the single greatest historical figure ever: “the Lion of Judah” (Genesis 49:9–10, Revelation 5:5), our Loving Saviour Jesus Christ—Creator and Lord of all.

Related Articles

Further Reading

References and notes

  1. Driscoll, C., Clutton-Brock, J., Kitchener, A., O’Brien, S., The taming of the cat, Scientific American 300(6):68–75, 1 June 2009. [Subsequently published online with the altered title: “The evolution of house cats.”] Return to text.
  2. Especially those with coats having the distinctive mackerel-tabby pelage pattern of curved stripes. Return to text.
  3. Pendragon, B. and Winkler, N., The family of cats—delineation of the feline basic type, J. Creation 25(2):118–124, 2011; creation.com/cat-kind. Return to text.
  4. Driscoll, C.A., and 12 others, The Near Eastern origin of cat domestication, Science 317(5837):519–523, 27 July 2007. Return to text.
  5. English, R., Every cat traced to mother of all felines, The Advertiser (Adelaide, Australia), 30 June 2007, p. 76; cf. Catchpoole, D., Cats from Shinar, not Egypt, October 2007; creation.com/cats-shinar. Return to text.
  6. Ambler, M., Natural selection ≠ evolution, Creation 34(2):38–39, 2012; creation.com/nse. Return to text.
  7. Walker, T., Don’t fall for the bait and switch—sloppy language leads to sloppy thinking, Creation 29(4):38–39, 2007; creation.com/baitandswitch. Return to text.
  8. Cat saves boy from dog attack: YouTube video shows family pet rescuing child, independent.co.uk, 14 May 2014. Return to text.
  9. Meet Dante: Britain’s first vegetarian cat who refuses to eat meat or fish, dailymail.co.uk, 14 April 2009. Return to text.
  10. Wieland, C., The cat who refuses to eat meat, 28 April 2009; creation.com/vegcat. Return to text.
  11. Catchpoole, D., The lion that wouldn’t eat meat, Creation 22(2):22–23, 2000; creation.com/lion. Return to text.
  12. Catchpoole, D., Lea, the spaghetti lioness, Creation 29(4):44–45, 2007; creation.com/spag. Return to text.
  13. Little Tyke, like Dante the house cat, refused all offers of meat. Cf. Lea, which at seven years of age was successfully moved from an Italian zoo to a game reserve in South Africa where it made the transition to a more conventional carnivore’s diet. Return to text.
  14. E.g. Wieland C., At last, a good mutation? J. Creation 10(3):298, 1996; creation.com/back-mutation, reporting on: Cohen, P., Child’s lethal gene fault heals itself, New Scientist 151(2039):16, 1996. Return to text.
  15. Note however that such mutation repair is restorative, i.e. it in no way is the sort of genetic change that evolutionists seek as evidence of how never-previously-existing genetic information might have evolved into being. Rather, the increasing discoveries of inbuilt DNA repair mechanisms present a huge challenge to evolutionists, particularly in organisms where one or more generations have elapsed since the degradational mutation first occurred. DeWitt, D., Startling plant discovery presents problems for evolution, J. Creation 19(2):3–4, 2006; creation.com/plant-v-evolution. Return to text.

Julie I. wrote: “Thank you so much for this site! I am very blessed already. I appreciate you sharing all these helps and resources. Especially the free ones. We are grateful!” Keep the free stuff coming. Support this site

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
Readers’ comments
Judie S., Australia, 24 June 2017

One of my daughter's favourite web-sites is a film-theory site. Recently he investigated whether Simba, from 'The Lion King', after leaving his pride as a small cub, could really have survived until maturity with his odd friends Pumba and Timone, eating what they ate. His conclusion was that he COULD feasibly live for up to three years on a diet of termites, but would lose his teeth and thus be unable to win a fight with his uncle Scar!

Peggy F., Australia, 23 June 2017

I own 10 cats and would have to say they are affectionate and loyal as well as great for catching rats and mice on my property. They say owning a cat is much less stressful than owning a dog. As for people wanting 'watchdogs' my cats constantly alert me when someone arrives and definitely have their favourite people they like and the ones they choose not to like.

Hans B., Australia, 19 June 2017

According to the first statement listed from ref: 'The taming of the cat, Scientific American' stating “contribute virtually nothing in the way of sustenance or work to human endeavour.” I find this statement utterly untrue. Cats (domestic) can and do have a profound effect on companionship and are a valued member of the family due to it. And what does companionship do for the soul? Reduces stress and adds fun.

I work hard so my cat can have a better life!

I for one am glad to serve my cat masters...

Kevin M., Australia, 19 June 2017

In Indonesia we encountered one pet cat that had lived all its life on a vegetarian diet, due to meat being unavailable for it. But it had one disadvantage - it did not have a single tooth left in its mouth! As it did not have to chew its food, its teeth had all decayed and were now lost. It was thus unable to hunt, and wholly dependent on its human family for its food.

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
Copied to clipboard
11969
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.