The evolution train’s a-comin’
Evolution would require new genetic information, but only loss of genetic information is observed
mutations
Back to Topics
Plant geneticist: ‘Darwinian evolution is impossible’
Ground-breaking research shows that evolution by mutations and natural selection just does not work.
Responses to our 15 Questions: part 1
Our 15 Questions for Evolutionists pamphlet has sparked many responses
from evolutionists and skeptics attempting to answer.
Gain-of-function mutations: at a loss to explain molecules-to-man evolution
Mutations are supposedly the raw material for evolution. Most are harmful or neutral.
But even mutations that result in new functions are really informationally downhill,
because they cause loss of specificity.
Superbugs not super after all
‘Superbugs’ are seen by some as evidence of evolution in action but the truth is rather different.
Can’t drink milk? You’re “normal”!
For years, lactose intolerance was regarded as abnormal.
Beetle bloopers
Despite what evolutionists say, mutations are not evidence for evolution but rather evidence against it.
Does gene duplication provide the engine for evolution?
There are a number of problems with evolution by gene duplication and mutation.
The mutant ‘feather-duster’ budgie
A genetic copying mistake hampered this bird’s development and limited its lifespan.
From ape to man via genetic meltdown: a theory in crisis
A review of Genetic Entropy & The Mystery of the Genome by John C. Sanford
Time—no friend of evolution
‘Millions of years’ don’t help—in fact they make it worse.
Genetics: no friend of evolution