Journal of Creation archive > Volume 21 Issue 3

Journal of Creation

Volume 21, Issue 3
Published December 2007
127 pages

Click here to subscribe to the Journal of Creation

Click on the PDF icons below to view any of these articles as a PDF in a new window. You can save the PDF to your computer from there or right click on the icon below and click on 'save target as' (or similar).

Contents:

Page	Title
3–5	Fossil embryos deep in the fossil record Perspective by Michael J. Oard
5–6	Big birdosaur blues: new fossil creates problems for dino-to-bird evolution (Pre-publication) Perspective by Shaun Doyle
6–8	Naracoorte Caves: an archive in the dark Perspective by Emil Silvestru
8–11	Katrina’s splay deposits: a small example of the power of flowing water Perspective by Tas Walker
11–12	Feathery flight of fancy: alleged ‘protofeathers’ fail under close scrutiny Perspective by Shaun Doyle
12–14	Migrating planets and migrating theories Perspective by Wayne Spencer
15–16	Evolutionary origin of life even more difficult Perspective by Michael J. Oard
17	No more love for Lucy? (Pre-publication version) Perspective by Ryan Jaroncyk
18	Terrible lizards trapped by terrible Flood Perspective by Tas Walker
19–23	Astronomical troubles for the astronomical hypothesis of ice ages Overview by Michael J. Oard
24–26	Evidence for turtle evolution Overview Jerry Bergman and Wayne Frair
27–31	Florid forensic fable A review of The Making of the Fittest: DNA and the Ultimate Forensic Record of Evolution by Sean B. Carroll Book Review by Alex Williams
32–36	Still discontent A review of Darwinism and Its Discontents by Michael Ruse Book Review by Lael Weinberger
37–43	Sloppy, lazy and dishonest A review of Science and Faith: Friends or Foes? by C. John Collins Book Review by Andrew Kulikovsky
44–46	Strong case, but flawed by compromise A review of The Case for a Creator by Lee Strobel Book Review by Lita Sanders
47–52	String Theory—causing a disturbance of cosmic proportions A review of The Cosmic Landscape by Leonard Susskind Book Review by Mary Beth De Repentigny
52–54	A pathetic case for an old earth A review of A Biblical Case for an Old Earth by David Snoke Book Review by Lita Sanders
55–57	The HAR1F gene: a Darwinian paradox Countering the Critics Article by Peer Terborg and Royal Truman
58–60	The Flood/post-Flood boundary Letter to the Editor by Max J. Hunter. Reply: Michael Oard
60–61	WMAP ‘noisy’ data? Letter to the Editor by James Upton
61	Biblical chronology—our times are in his hands Letter to the Editor by Larry Pierce. Reply: Mike Viccary
61–62	The problems of traditional chronology Letter to the Editor by Rod Bernitt
62–66	‘Short’ sojourn comes up short? Letter to the Editor by Brenton Minge. Replies: Mike Viccary and David Austin
66–68	Pioneer anomaly: still unsolved? Letter to the Editor by James Upton. Reply: Russell Humphreys
68	Tidal considerations Letter to the Editor by Jack C. Sofield. Reply: JoC Editors
69–76	Days 1–4 Viewpoint by Frank DeRemer, Mark Amunrud and Delmar Dobberpuhl
77–83	Life’s irreducible structure—Part 2: naturalistic objections Paper by Alex Williams
84–92	Genetic code optimisation: Part 2 Paper by Royal Truman and Peer Terborg
93–101	On literary theorists’ approach to Genesis 1: Part 2 Paper by Marc Kay
102–110	Haeckel: legacy of fraud to popularise evolution Paper by Pauli J. Ojala and Matti Leisola
111–117	Astonishing DNA complexity demolishes neo-Darwinism Paper by Alex Williams
118–127	Why the shared mutations in the Hominidae exon X GULO pseudogene are not evidence for common descent Paper by Royal Truman and Peer Terborg