The problem of the wet Sahara

by

PERS_GreenSahara-fig1-b
Figure 1. Shorelines in southern Death Valley, California, USA, from an Ice Age lake 180 m deep.

Both creation and secular geologists agree the earth’s deserts and semi-arid areas were once well watered.1 Creation scientists attribute this to the ponding of water in enclosed basins during the run-off stage of the Flood and greater Ice Age precipitation. During this time the Great Salt Lake in Utah, USA, was about 12 times its current area and about 330 m deeper.2 Measuring the ancient shorelines in Death Valley, California, USA (figure 1), shows a lake once filled Death Valley 170 m deep.2 Today it is one of the hottest, driest places on Earth.

The Sahara Desert was also well watered

Today the Sahara Desert is also one of the hottest and driest places on Earth, but field and satellite pictures record evidence of ancient large lakes and rivers.3,4,5 Paleolake Chad was much larger than today at 340,000 km2 in area.6 Countless Neolithic artefacts and fossils of aquatic animals, such as the hippopotamus, indicate comparatively recent climate change.7 Dwarf Nile River crocodiles have been found as recently as the early 20th century in isolated Sahara oases.8 Judging by the thousands of rock petroglyphs, the population of the Sahara was quite large. James Wellard states:

The Sahara is a veritable art gallery of prehistoric paintings. … The evidence is enough to show that the Sahara was one of the well-populated areas of the prehistoric world. … Yet there is his work, in the most inaccessible corners of the desert, literally thousands of figures of tropical and aquatic animals, enormous herds of cattle, hunters armed with bows and boomerangs, and even ‘domestic’ scenes of women and children and the circular huts in which they lived.9

Others corroborate:

Occupation is clearly testified in the frequent rock engravings that are scattered throughout the upland regions of the desert, illustrating a lush environment with Sahelian and riverine fauna and scenes of large-game hunting, livestock herding and religious ceremony … .10

This period of time is called the African Humid Period (AHP).

Timing of the African Humid Period

The timing of the AHP has been debated, but secular researchers generally believe it started about 15,000 years ago.11,12 Based on 3,287 carbon-14 dates from 1,011 Neolithic archeological sites, they surmise that humans were in northern Africa 5,500–10,500 years ago. So, the AHP is inferred to have likely ended about 5,500 years ago in the uniformitarian timescale. This corresponds to the very late Pleistocene, during deglaciation, and the early to mid-Holocene, after the biblical Ice Age.

That the wet period in the southwest United States occurred during the Ice Age or shortly afterwards is corroborated by high shorelines cut into end moraines. For instance, a shoreline from pluvial Mono Lake in the Owens Valley, about 242 m higher than the 1975 level of Mono Lake, was cut in the most extended end moraine that had formed east of the Sierra Nevada Mountains, California, USA.2 Since this end moraine was not deformed after the shoreline was carved, the ice must either have been melting at the time or had totally melted from the Sierra Nevada Mountains. The highest point of the lake could not have occurred long after the Ice Age because the Ice Age climate was very wet with strong drying afterwards.1 The heavy Sierra snow should generally coincide with the high levels of pluvial lakes.

The timing of the wet period in the Sahara Desert and the south-west U.S. partly coincide. It is claimed to have been dry in North Africa from the last glacial maximum to 15,000 years ago12 and the south-west USA pluvial lakes dried out rapidly in the Holocene. The difference in timing, if real, could simply be due to the difference in latitudes.

Cause of the African Humid Period

iStockphotodesert

Secular scientists really do not know why the AHP occurred. It is assumed the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) that causes an east-west heavy rain band and tropical forests through central Africa somehow moved up to 600 km north. The ITCZ is related to the current general circulation of the atmosphere, and scientists do not know how or why it could be farther north during the AHP.13,14 Some models claim modest success in moving the ITCZ a little farther northward due to Milankovitch fluctuations and the increase in greenhouse gases.12 One wonders how slight changes in Earth radiation balance caused by the Milankovitch mechanism15 and an increase in carbon dioxide after the Ice Age would produce an ITCZ significantly farther north than today. Carbon dioxide is significantly higher today than right after the Ice Age, and the ITCZ remains stable in its central African location, since it is locked to its average location by the general circulation. Creation scientists do not have an explanation for the AHP either, except the post-Flood Ice Age has more potential to explain it, with much more precipitation caused by the warm oceans after the Flood.16

References and notes

  1. Oard, M.J., Frozen in Time: Woolly Mammoths, the Ice Age, and the Biblical Key to Their Secrets, Master Books, Green Forest, AR, pp. 41–44, 2004. Return to text.
  2. Smith, G.I. and Street-Perrott, F.A., Pluvial lakes in the western United States; in: Wright, Jr., H.E. (Ed.), Late-Quaternary Environments of the United States, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 190–212, 1983. Return to text.
  3. Pachur, H.-J. and Kröpelin, S., Wadi Howar: paleoclimatic evidence from an extinct river system in the southeastern Sahara, Science 237:298–300, 1987. Return to text.
  4. Paillou, P., Schuster, M., Tooth, S. et al., Mapping of the major paleodrainage system in eastern Libya using orbital imaging radar: the Kufrah River, Earth and Planetary Science Letters 277:327–333, 2009. Return to text.
  5. Chorowicz, J. and Fabre, J., Organization of drainage networks from space imagery in the Tanezrouft plateau (Western Sahara): implications for recent intracratonic deformations, Geomorphology 21:139–151, 1997. Return to text.
  6. Hoelzmann, P., Kruse, H.-J. and Rottinger, F., Precipitation estimates for the eastern Saharan palaeomonsoon based on a water balance model of the West Nubian palaeolake basin, Global and Planetary Change 26:105–120, 2000. Return to text.
  7. Kröpelin, S. and Soulié-Märsche, I., Charophyte remains from Wadi Howar as evidence for deep mid-Holocene freshwater lakes in the eastern Sahara of Northwest Sudan, Quaternary Research 36:210–223, 1991. Return to text.
  8. Drake, N.A., Blench, R.M., Armitage, S.J., Bristow, C.S. and White, K.H., Ancient watercourses and biogeography of the Sahara explain the peopling of the desert, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 108(2):458–462, 2011. Return to text.
  9. Wellard, J., The Great Sahara, E.P. Duggon & Co., New York, NY, pp. 33–34, 1964. Return to text.
  10. Manning, K. and Timpson, A., The demographic response to Holocene climate change in the Sahara, Quaternary Science Reviews 101:28–35, 2014. Return to text.
  11. Lécuyer, C., Lézine, A.-M., Fourel, F. et al., I-n-Atei paleolake documents past environmental changes in central Sahara at the time of the “Green Sahara”: Charchola, carbon isotope and diatom records, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 441:834–844, 2016. Return to text.
  12. Otto-Bliesner, B.L., Russell, J.M., Clark, P.U. et al., Coherent changes of southeastern equatorial and northern African rainfall during the last deglaciation, Science 346:1223–1227, 2014. Return to text.
  13. Braconnot, P., Joussaume, S., de Noblet, N. and Ramstein, G., Mid-Holocene and Last Glacial Maximum African monsoon changes as simulated within the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project, Global and Planetary Change 26:51–66, 2000. Return to text.
  14. Notaro, M., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Gallimore, R. and Levis, S., Combined statistical and dynamical assessment of simulated vegetation-rainfall interactions in North Africa during the mid-Holocene, Global Change Biology 14:347–368, 2008. Return to text.
  15. Oard, M.J., The Frozen Record: Examining the Ice Core History of the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets, Institute for Creation Research, Dallas, TX, 2005. Return to text.
  16. Oard, ref. 1, pp. 1–217. Return to text.

Helpful Resources

The Ice Age
From
US $10.00
DVD
Frozen in Time
by Michael J Oard
From
US $4.00

Reader’s comments

John N.
I'm also wondering if archaeology shows many other places were more habitable than today. Of course God did protect and provide for the people of Israel for those 40 years coming out of Egypt but there may have been better conditions than we see today. The same goes for the whole region. We look at the whole area today and we may not have a realistic picture of what the conditions were really like back then. When I have asked an archaeologist about that, the response was a lot of bronze age, iron age etc gibberish. I couldn't get a straight answer. Climate change has been a constant theme since the flood of Noah's time.
Egil W.
Two things that come to mind is the eco-disaster of the Aral sea, where - after two rivers that fed it with water were blocked - it began to dry immensly, and the other thing is the ground water-table in Yemen has sunk with a 1000 meter (recently).

Hm, one other thing... isolated oasis-lakes in the desert-plains of Mongolia or Tibetan plain which seems to have no ‘logical’ or visible water-sources (perhaps an underground-system feeds them).

Can Sahara have dried simply due to not having sustainable/long-lasting water-sources, only spending the remains of wetness left after the Flood (on the surface and in the sands/rocks) to create a lush or marshy landscape for relatively limited period (some centuries)?

If the Chad Lake has shrunk, why wouldn’t it be possible to think that much of the other watersources would shrink as the water/moisture/wetness left after the Flood would spend itself without any renewing effect or recycling (since such a global Flood is unique, have happened only once).?

Well, that was some things that came to my mind...
Craig R.
You mention Co2 - it is a trace chemical not responsible for climate, but falling out of climatic convection processes. Co2 is .0004 % of atmospheric gas by weight. Rounding errors do not affect climate, nor cause deserts. Whether the trace chemical necessary for O2 and glucose is .0002 or .0006 matters not. Don't fall into the fake secular science trap and claim that climate is a greenhouse (it clearly isn't, there is no 'glass ceiling' in the troposphere); or that an increase or decrease in the trace gas creates the Sahara. Obviously rain patterns changed - due to many factors - the earth's tilt, wind, oceanic currents etc. Basically we don't have a clue about why the Sahara appeared, nor do we have much of a clue about climate in general. Secular big science and fake fictional claims notwithstanding.

Have something to add?

Important: This is not a Q&A forum. If you have unresolved questions, please search our comprehensive Q&A pages or contact us directly.

Remaining characters: 1800/1800
Privacy & Guidelines