This article is from
Creation 40(3):56, July 2018

Browse our latest digital issue Subscribe

Black butterfly wings inspire solar cell design

black-butterfly-wings

by

The ‘common rose’ butterfly of India (Pachliopta aristolochiae) has big wings with large black patches. The black absorbs the sun’s rays that help warm the butterfly in cool weather.

Researchers analyzed the wings under an electron microscope, and discovered that the scales which cover them have their surface cratered by a ‘disordered’ array of tiny holes.2

These nanoholes trap the incident solar radiation, allowing a maximum to be absorbed, over a wide range of both wavelengths and angles. Structures that manipulate light on a microscopic scale are called photonic. The hollow scales also make the wing lighter.

The same researchers were inspired to design a new model of solar cell based on the butterfly wing pattern. This comprised thin silicon sheets with microscopic holes. A problem with normal solar cells is keeping them pointed at the sun, which requires expensive motion hardware. But the butterfly wing absorbs from almost any angle—and so does this new solar cell. Indeed, it absorbs twice as much sunlight as previous designs.

butterfly-wings

And not only was the design inspired by the butterfly wings, but so was the manufacture. In living creatures, the development of photonic structures must be controlled precisely. And this is done by a phase separation of liquids that don’t mix (immiscible).3 So these researchers used a solution of two polymers; one polymer that formed the sheets, and another polymer immiscible with the first. The resulting phase separation that made the network of nanoholes was surprisingly quick; it took only five to 10 minutes.

While there is no question that the solar cells were designed, it’s notable that a report also refers to the ‘design’ and ‘architecture’ of the butterfly wings.3–4 So using the scientific principle of analogy, which Darwin used all the time, should we not assume that the butterfly wings also had a Designer or Architect?

References and notes

  1. Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) all have tiny scales covering their wings, which provide insulation, or as here a more direct role in temperature control, plus patterns for e.g. camouflage, mimicry, etc. Return to text.
  2. Siddique, R.H. et al., Bioinspired phase-separated disordered nanostructures for thin photovoltaic absorbers, Science Advances 3(10):e1700232, 19 October 2017 | doi:10.1126/sciadv.1700232. Return to text.
  3. Dufresne, E.R. et al., Self-assembly of amorphous biophotonic nanostructures by phase separation, Soft Matter 5:1792–1795, 30 March 2009 | doi:10.1039/B902775K. Return to text.
  4. Yirka, B., Black butterfly wings offer a model for better solar cells, phys.org, 19 October 2017. Return to text.
  5. Copying designs from nature is the rapidly growing field of biomimetics—see creation.com/biomimetics. Return to text.

Helpful Resources

By Design
by Dr Jonathan Sarfati
From
US $15.00
Darwin's Black Box
by Michael J Behe
US $17.00
Soft cover

Readers’ comments

Donald V.
Can we say Patent Pending?
Dan M.
And its wing design all arose by chance mutations, right? Not a chance in a butterfly flying to the moon!
Its wing design fulfills its needs here on Earth perfectly according to the perfect will of the omniscient designer, Jesus the Christ. Any rational person can see this and you have to stretch your imagination to think otherwise.
Are there really any pure atheists? I have to believe deep down, they must know the squirrel is in the other tree!
The resistance of atheists to see God’s design at work reminds me of the verse where Jesus tells Paul to stop resisting (Acts 9:5).
You deserve all the honor and glory LORD, Amen
Chris M.
It legit blows my mind someone could sit there and think this thing evolved over millions of years and that's how it developed this. Mind blowing stuff!
David B.
I started to save articles about Biomimetics because they show the design in nature that is ridiculous to assign to billions of years of mutations and struggling to survive, but I stopped because there have been so many I can just tell people to look for them, knowing they will find plenty!

Another area is articles referring to biomolecular machines, motors, designs—there are so many examples of such wonderful things even in bacteria, essential to all living things! Love to see articles about these, but again, it's easy to find examples in the mainstream science press about them, although evolution is often given its required token credit.

What I would like to see more of is articles about the examples of systematically organized, dynamic complexity which evolutionists must claim arose through natural processes time and time again, mostly in that huge yawning gap before the “Cambrian explosion”, but many cases would have formed even afterward, in their imaginary timeline. Evolutionists have always appealed to imagination to vaguely morph one form into another. We see that in aspects of size, proportion, coloration, and similar changes in bodies and integuments such changes can happen rapidly, but we do NOT see even small steps toward the formation of new, organized systems of moving parts made of diverse materials. [Hyoerlinks added—Ed.]
Jonathan Sarfati
Our Q&A page on Design has a number of different categories including those you mention, and an index box to find them quickly.

Comments are automatically closed 14 days after publication.