The Skeptics and their ‘Churchian’ Allies

When a vocal defender of the Bible’s authority, even one who attacks evolution, is morally disgraced in the public eye, what does that say about the link between evolution and morality?

What does history say?

Most branches of science were founded by biblical creationists. Some skeptics claim that there was no evolutionary alternative.

How should Christians respond to the growing popularity of Buddhism and the associated idea of reincarnation?

Being careful not to play into the opposition’s hands …

Scientists say that a certain spot in the brain produces religious feeling; does that mean it’s all in our heads?

Could Noah’s Ark have been a giant coracle, as claimed by British Museum curator Irving Finkel in his translation of a Babylonian tablet?

Misotheists like Dawkins attack creationist teachings, but give credence to wacky ideas like ‘Jesus never existed’ rejected by historians. Other antitheists like Bill Maher hold even wackier views, e.g. rejecting germ theory.

Richard Dawkins says a rabbit fossil in the Precambrian would be evidence against evolution, but would that really be the case?

Where they are not ignored, creationists are invariably disparaged and misrepresented.