Explore
dating-problems
Back to Topics
Page 1 of 3 (32 Articles)
The way it really is: little-known facts about radiometric dating
Long-age geologists will not accept a radiometric date unless it matches their pre-existing expectations.
by Tas Walker
Carbon-14 dating—explained in everyday terms
Carbon-14 dating—explained in everyday terms
by Dr Carl Wieland
Tree ring dating (dendrochronology)
by Don Batten, Ph.D.
Radiocarbon in dino bones
International conference result censored.
by Carl Wieland
Radiometric dating and the age of the Earth
The 4.5 billion-year radiometric ‘age’ of the earth is based on faulty assumptions even secular researchers have acknowledged.
by Ralph W. Matthews, Ph.D.
Radiometric dating breakthroughs
Radiometric dating breakthroughs
by Carl Wieland, Australia
The fatal flaw with radioactive dating methods
When you peel away the mystery it’s obvious that the dates are not objectively measured.
by Tas Walker
Flaws in dating the earth as ancient
When the numbers don’t add up, it’s time to examine the methods and the philosophy behind them.
by Alexander R. Williams
Radio-dating in Rubble
How the explosive, 1980 eruption of Mt St Helens demolished radio-isotope dating.
by Keith Swenson
Evidences for a young earth and universe
‘Billions of years’ is accepted without question but there is lots of evidence that the earth and universe are much, much younger.
by Don Batten
Swedish trees older than the universe?
A closer look at a claim about the world’s oldest trees—allegedly older than the biblical date of creation.
by Carl Wieland
More on radioactive dating problems
Why the isotopic dates cannot be trusted.
by Jim Mason