The papers are full of the usual hype that a definite and crucially important human ancestor has been found. But a closer look reveals more of the ‘same old-same-old’.

The June 2003 issue of the leading Pentecostal magazine Charisma featured a shocking cover story, an error-filled puff piece about the leading ‘progressive creationist’ Hugh Ross plus a hatchet job on biblical (‘young earth’) creation.

Adam’s Brothers? Race, Science, and Genesis Before Darwin

Do the ‘molecular clock’ assumptions of the most popular version of human evolution and dispersal, the ‘Out of Africa’ hypothesis stand up under scrutiny?

This fossil type is widely touted as our ancestor. The discovery of an extremely well-preserved specimen focuses attention on the evidence that things are not what evolutionists would have hoped.

‘Disgustingly racist and offensive’ pictures on the internet of America’s First Lady have caused a furore, for which Google executives have apologized. What’s behind it all?

Evolutionists who linked human brain size to intelligence have had to change their story.

Evolution fuels racism; the Bible refutes it.

A hunter-gatherer tribe thought to have “descended unchanged from the Stone Age” has recently been DNA-tested—with “astonishing” results.

How a missionary family gave rise to the top name in ‘apeman’ research!

A battle for supremacy amongst ‘apeman’ contenders, but neither descended from Adam.

I couldn’t help but note your shade of melanin.