This commonly asked question has wider implications when the origin of life is considered.

Many kinds of eyes exist, but there is no progression of eye designs from simple to complex in the fossils. Even the simplest light-detecting cell requires enormously complicated coordinated biochemistry.

Morphological analysis points to genetic variation within the one human kind, so the case for human evolution collapses.

It has become dogma that human and chimp DNA is ‘only’ 1% different, but this is very, very wrong.

Peter Line reviews the status of the varied fossils not labelled as ‘Homo’ that evolutionists interpret as our ancestors. He shows that their story does not stack up.

AFL star Adam Goodes said he was ’gutted’ by a 13-year-old girl’s taunt.

Just because ape-to-human evolution is popular doesn’t make it plausible.

An icon of evolution is grimly representative of evolution’s role in inspiring racism.

How do we explain ‘apeman’ fossils from a biblical perspective?

Might it actually be evidence for design?

Please advice ‘teaser’