A history of the United Methodist Church’s opposition to creationism and intelligent design
A history of opposition to a literal understanding of Genesis
Theistic-evolution
Back to Topics
Hugh Ross bluffs at church meeting
At church meetings, Ross still makes blatantly false claims, including about church fathers, human fossils, Neandertals, and the flood.
From the mouths of sceptics
“From the horse’s mouth”—one has to smile when evolutionary scientists unintentionally provide strong confirmation of the views of those ‘pesky’ creationists!
A 'genealogical' Adam and Eve?
A new model that claims Adam and Eve can be the genealogical ancestors, but not the genetic ancestors, of all people alive today, after people evolved from apes, fails all biblical tests.
Would Christ create through evolution?
Refuting another theistic evolutionary argument from N.T. Wright.
Responding to theistic evolution
Theistic evolution denies the doctrine of marriage, union with Christ and the need for a redeemer
God’s rest—A problem for theistic evolution
While the Bible says God finished His work of creation, theistic evolutionists say the world is still under construction.
Priest calls CMI heretical
Is he right?
Did God create an ‘open’ universe?
If theistic evolution is true, is God responsible for the universe?
Why is theistic evolution so problematic?
Dialogue with a long-time theistic evolutionary objector to our material highlights the problems and dangers of theistic evolution.
No keeper’s brother
We hope you enjoy this sneak preview from the now-released December issue of
Journal of Creation. Subscribers will be delighted by the powerful, stimulating
content.
Theistic evolutionary doublespeak
A review of The Language of Science and Faith by Karl W. Giberson and Francis S. Collins.