Responding to vexatious evolutionist challenges about genetic information.

Many alleged contradictions in Scripture are solved by pointing out Jewish citation methods and distinguishing thematic from chronological order.

While many sceptics claim that creationist qualifications are fraudulent, in reality CMI’s and almost all other creationist scientists have genuine degrees. Why do old- and young-earth creationists disagree?

Are books quoted in the New Testament really authoritative?

Many atheists barely even attempt a reasoned argument. The response shows that consistent Christianity provides the only logical basis for morality, charity, reason and science.

A supporter asks for help in answering challenges posed by Darwinists.

What is ‘selfish gene’ theory? And is the palmaris longus muscle in the arm ‘vestigial’?

An enquirer asks about ‘Southwest Colorado Man’. This gives an opportunity to discuss some of the other amazing ‘human evolution’ claims made on the basis of fragmentary evidence.

Secular scientists are continually expressing astonishment at the complexity they find in creatures they presume to be primitive, and at the fact that they contain a proportion of DNA sequences identical to those in humans.

Are your children being served a ‘side’ of spiritual falsehood along with their ‘fries and cola?’

Is evidence for evolution really evidence for creation? If Genesis is untrue, what does this say about the rest of Scripture?

The ‘selfish gene’ idea is being used to teach evolution. But surely a mindless gene can’t really exhibit selfishness, so what does it mean, and does it really support evolution?