Journal of Creation archive > Volume 27 Issue 2

Journal of Creation

Volume 27, Issue 2
Published August 2013
127 pages

Click here to subscribe to the Journal of Creation

Contents:

Page	Title
3–4	Variable radioactive decay rates and the changes in solar activity Perspective by Andrew Sibley
5–6	The apparent age of the time dilated universe—explaining the missing intracluster media in globular clusters Perspective by Ronald G. Samec
7–8	Raindrop imprints and the location of the pre-Flood/Flood boundary Perspective by Michael J. Oard
9–10	Non-Christian philosopher clears up myths about Augustine and the term ‘literal’ Perspective by Lita Sanders and Jonathan Sarfati
11–12	Lunar formation—collision theory fails Perspective by Ronald G. Samec
12–13	More secular confusion about the moon’s former magnetic field Perspective by D. Russell Humphreys
14	More evidence Australopithecus was an extinct ape Perspective by Michael J. Oard
15–19	Correctly (or incorrectly?) dividing the Word A review of The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Bible by Robert J. Hutchinson Book Review by Daniel Davidson and Bret Kendall
19–20	Latin grammar could have ‘complexified’ during its ‘prehistory’ A review of Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity by Peter Trudgill Book Review by Ian Crookston
21–22	Another knowledgable atheist acknowledges the inadequacy of materialistic evolutionary reductionism A review of Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False by Thomas Nagel Book Review by John Woodmorappe
23–28	Rewriting the days of Genesis A review of Revisiting the Days of Genesis by B.C. Hodge Book Review by Andrew S. Kulikovsky
29–32	Adaptationist speculations, and some experiments—not the power of evolution A review of Evolution for Everyone by David Sloan Wilson Book Review by John Woodmorappe
33–36	Settling for Less A review of God’s Words in Human Words by Kenton L. Sparks Book Review by J.P. Holding
37–38	If evolutionists inspired Scripture A review of Seven Glorious Days: A Scientist Retells the Genesis Creation Story by Karl W. Giberson Book Review by Lita Sanders
39	Do radioisotope methods yield trustworthy relative ages for the earth’s rocks? Letter from Don Stenberg. Reply: John Baumgardner
39–42	Russell Humphreys’ cosmology Letter from Randy Speir. Reply: D. Russell Humphreys
43–45	The Flood/post-Flood boundary Letter from Marcus Ross. Reply: Michael J. Oard
46–48	Global tectonics—clarity, not confusion Letter from Michael J. Oard. Reply: John Baumgardner
48	A call for research into two areas Letter from Don Stenberg
49–54	A developing schism in Flood geology Viewpoint by Carl R. Froede Jr and A. Jerry Akridge
55–61	The Queen of Sheba and the Ethiopian problem Viewpoint by Patrick Clarke
62–70	Surficial continental erosion places the Flood/post-Flood boundary in the late Cenozoic Paper by Michael J. Oard
71–77	Lessons from Augustine’s De Genesi ad Litteram—Libri Duodecim Paper by Andrew Sibley
78–84	Why consensus science is anti-science Paper by Jerry Bergman
85–90	It’s a small world—microRNA cuts evolution down to size Paper by Mike Roe Arneigh
91–98	Two possible mechanisms linking cosmic rays to weather and climate Paper by Jake Hebert
99–104	Is Genesis 1 just reworked Babylonian myth? Paper by Murray R. Adamthwaite
105–111	The ‘Darwin’ of German legal theory—Carl von Savigny and the German School of Historical Law Paper by Augusto Zimmermann
112–119	Can the relative timing of radioisotope dates be applied to biblical geology? Paper by Michael J. Oard
120–127	The theological corruption of the Evangelical Church Essay by Andrew S. Kulikovsky