Journal of Creation 34(3):5–7, December 2020
Browse our latest digital issue Subscribe
‘Snowball Earth’ out with a bang?
Ever since the discovery that Earth had once been glaciated to a far greater extent than it is today, the Ice Age has been an iconic feature of secular geology. Although a single ice age in the recent past challenged the notion of uniformity of Earth’s gradual processes, the uniformitarian multiplication of Earth’s glacial periods was quickly heralded as a victory for the antiquity of Earth, despite the evidence supporting a single glaciation. 1 Over the succeeding decades, geologists have inferred dozens of alleged glaciations, predominately in five major periods of geohistory (table 1), the oldest of which are the Huronian glaciations (2.45–2.22 Ga) in the Early Proterozoic.2 These Huronian glaciations, among others, are opined to have been uncommonly extensive, dominating the majority of Earth’s surface, even to the equatorial regions. Popularly termed ‘snowball Earth’, this inference has nearly gained consensus in secular geology and great repute in the entertainment sector. Notwithstanding this popularity, numerous challenges plague these uniformitarian notions, chief of which is the lack of a melting mechanism to end the perpetuation of these global ice ages. In a desperate attempt to save the paradigm, a recent study has suggested that an asteroid impact terminated the Huronian glaciations (figure 1).
The old story
Beginning in the mid-nineteenth century, geologists began recognizing evidence for a glaciation in recent geohistory that far exceeded the present glacial extent. Following the trend to minimize the influence of the Genesis Flood, some geologists heralded the discovery of an ice age as accounting for the surficial deposits (‘diluvium’) previously relegated to a diminutive Genesis Flood, allegedly eliminating the need for a Flood-based geology. Although the presence of an ice age challenged uniformitarian doctrine (‘the present is the key to the past’), geologists soon inferred other supposed glaciations throughout geohistory that coincided appropriately with the cyclicity of gradualistic geology. These cycles of glacial and interglacial alternations have been identified in five major periods of Earth’s history, the earliest being the glaciations of the Early Proterozoic. These early ice ages, equalling three discrete glacial periods between 2.45–2.32 Ga, and possibly a fourth ending at 2.2 Ga (the Makganyene Glaciation3,4), have been termed the ‘Huronian glaciations’ based on the initial identification of ‘tillites’ (alleged lithified glacial deposits) in Southern Canada.2 Paleocontinental reconstructions suggest that these supposed tillites formed along the equator, indicating that glaciations had dominated the majority of Earth’s surface in the Early Proterozoic. This has resulted in the popular sobriquet ‘snowball Earth’ for these and other similarly pervasive glaciations.5
Despite the overwhelming consensus, numerous challenges continue to plague these alleged ancient glaciations. Much of the diagnostic criteria used to identify ancient ice ages can be explained by mass wasting;6 even the initiation (and thus the cyclicity) of an ice age is wholly inexplicable in secular geology.7 Snowball Earth particularly lacks a forcing mechanism to end an ice age. Such an extensive glaciation would produce such a high reflectivity (albedo) that it would be nearly impossible to heat Earth out of a glaciation, especially during a time when solar irradiance was greatly diminished. 8 To account for these challenges, numerous rescuing mechanisms have been proposed, including an increase in volcanism accompanied by an influx of greenhouse gases, although this also suffers from major difficulties.9
A new twist
Faced with these insurmountable challenges, what can secular geologists do? Following the resurgence of naturalistic neocatastrophism in recent decades, a greater number of secular geologists have begun to rely on extraterrestrial forcing mechanisms, as did Ericson et al. in their recent Goldschmidt abstract10 and paper in Nature Communications.11 After investigating the Yarrabubba Crater of the Australian Outback, Ericson et al. proposed that an asteroid impact strengthened the termination of the global Huronian glaciations (figure 1).
Located in the Archean Yilgarn Craton of Western Australia, the Yarrabubba Crater is replete with shatter cones, pseudotachylytes,12 and other diagnostic criteria that confirm it as one of the largest impact craters in the area and it has been dated as among the oldest along the craton,13 if not the world.11 Despite the evidence for an impact, the granitoids and greenschists that harbour this impact structure have made dating this site anomalous. Early research by McDonald et al. suggested an upper limit of 2.65 Ga, based on the interpretation that the Barlangi Granophyre was an impact melt,14 although later researchers preferred 1.1 Ga, based on pseudotachylyte dikes.13 Upon this groundwork, Ericson et al. dated the impact to no more than about 2.6 Ga, as calculated by McDonald et al., but preferred a date of 2.2 Ga. This younger age roughly coincides with the end of the Makganyene Glaciation, the finale of the Huronian glaciations at 2.22 Ga.2 Ericson et al. opine this impact melted a considerable volume of ice and ejected it into the atmosphere. This would allegedly lower the cumulative albedo of the terrestrial cryosphere while increasing the atmospheric levels of water vapour, producing a greenhouse warming and thus ending the Huronian glaciations. It was not long before the Ericson et al. proposal began gaining attention from the popular media for its allegedly novel solution to snowball earth, including an article in Science.15
A common consideration, particularly for those skeptical of an impact inducing the End Cretaceous mass extinctions,16 is that coincidence does not necessitate causation. However, age estimates of the local geology ranging from 2.65 to 1.1 Ga make it hard to even show that the Yarrabubba impact was coincident with the cessation of the Huronian glaciations. Such a wide array of possible dates should caution researchers against possibly forcing the numbers, but even so the termination of the Huronian glaciations is subject to much debate,17 making it impossible to prove coincidence.
Even if the Yarrabubba impact was indeed coincident with the end of the Huronian glaciations, the impact would merely correlate to the Makganyene Glaciation, the final of four distinct Huronian glaciations. If the preceding three glaciations could be terminated without impacts, why is an impact required to end the fourth glaciation? Even so, the Makganyene Glaciation is the most tenuous and debated of the four, as it has been discovered only in southern Africa18 and possibly China. 19 So little is known about this ‘glaciation’ that secular geologists must infer a minimum age of 2.2 Ga, based on dating flood basalts which unconformably overly the alleged tillites,3,20 allowing a date greater than 2.2 Ga to be acceptable. How difficult it is to prove coincidence between two events, the dates of which are not known!
Computer simulations in the Ericson et al. paper suggested a variety of climatic responses to the impact, most of which indicated only minimal response. Unlike the optimism of Ericson et al., some scientists doubt that enough ice could be melted and ejected into the atmosphere to initiate the necessary greenhouse effect.15 Even if adequate quantities of liquid water could be introduced into the atmosphere, the Yarrabubba impact produced extensive ejecta that would raise aerosol levels in the stratosphere. Having a high albedo in their own right, these aerosols would quickly become nucleation sites for the newly melted water in the atmosphere. Because cool air can retain little water before reaching the dew point, this newly melted water could not be long retained in the cool, dry atmosphere of the snowball earth climate before condensing. These resulting clouds, known to meteorologists as some of the most influential thermostatic regulators in the atmosphere, would merely equalize the greenhouse effect by reflecting incoming solar radiation, which would have been lower due to the faint young sun paradox.8 Rather than commencing a runaway greenhouse effect, these factors could initiate a negative feedback mechanism that would soon terminate any net heating introduced by the Yarrabubba impact.
Ever since the discovery of the Ice Age, uniformitarian geology continues in vain to understand this unparalleled phenomenon. Although cyclic glaciations may better coincide with uniformity, repeated ice ages only multiply the challenges. To remain internally consistent with the application of their diagnostic criteria, the uniformitarians are compelled to postulate global glaciations despite the various difficulties. Oddly enough, secular geologists seem more than content to propose global inundations of ice but abhor any suggestion of a global flood!
The lack of a forcing mechanism to end snowball Earth leads to the production of such ad hoc suggestions as an inexplicable increase in volcanism or a mystifying influx of atmospheric greenhouse gasses. The asteroid impact of Ericson et al. suffers a similar fate. Not only is causation impossible to demonstrate, but even the coincidence of the impact with the end of the final Huronian glaciation is dubious. Rather than terminating a glaciation, an impact may even reinforce the glaciation by adding highly reflective ejecta and aerosols into the atmosphere and producing high albedo clouds. The Ericson et al. study also neglected the effects of the lower levels of solar irradiance due to the faint young sun paradox. Indeed, instead of solving the mystery, Ericson et al. merely reinforced the reason for doubting the multiple ice age paradigm. Because of the failure of uniformitarian postulates, some secular researchers continue to search for a causal forcing mechanism to terminate the Huronian ‘snowball Earth’ glaciations. As long as the impact of the Genesis Flood on our planet is ignored, the Ice Age will remain a baffling puzzle to secular researchers.
References and notes
- Oard, M.J., Only one glaciation observed in western Alberta, Canada—the ice-age reinforcement syndrome, J. Creation 29(2):11–12, 2015; creation.com/alberta-one-glaciation. Return to text.
- Becker, A., Huronian glaciation; in: Gargaud, M., Irvine, W.M., Amils, R., Cleaves, H.J., Pinti, D., Quintanilla, J.C., and Viso, M. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Astrobiology, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 768–772, 2011. Return to text.
- Kopp, R.E., Kirschvink, J.L., Hilburn, I.A., and Nash, C.Z., The Paleoproterozoic Snowball Earth: A climate disaster triggered by the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis, PNAS 102(32):11131–11136, 2005. Return to text.
- Although many researchers believe that there were four Huronian glaciations, some suggest there were only three glaciations while the alleged fourth (Makganyene) was synchronous with the others. See Tang, H. and Chen, Y., Global glaciations and atmospheric change at ca. 2.3 Ga, Geoscience Frontiers 4:583–596, 2013. Return to text.
- Despite the overwhelming popularity of the Snowball Earth concept, some secular geologists remain skeptical. See Young, G.M., Evolution of Earth’s climatic system: evidence from ice ages, isotopes, and impacts, GSA Today 23(10):4–10, 2013. Return to text.
- See Oard, M.J., An ancient ‘ice age’ deposit attributed to subaqueous mass flow—again! J. Creation 22(2):36–39, 2008 and references therein; creation.com/ice-age-mass-flow. Return to text.
- See Isaacs, E., The Missoula Flood—analogue for the greatest flood of all, J. Creation 33(2):30–32, 2019 and references therein; creation.com/bretzflood. Return to text.
- Faulkner, D., The young faint Sun paradox and the age of the solar system, J. Creation 15(2):3–4, 2001; creation.com/faintsun. Return to text.
- See the review in Chapter Six of Oard, M.J., Frozen in Time: The Great Woolly Mammoths, the Ice Age, and the Biblical Key to Their Secrets, Master Books, Green Forest, AZ, 2004. eBook. Return to text.
- Erickson, T.M., Kirkland, C.L., Timms, N.E., Cavosie, A.J, and Davison, T.M., Earth’s Oldest Preserved Impact Structure—Yarrabubba, Western Australia, Goldschmidt 2019 Abstract, Goldschmidt Conference, 2019, goldschmidtabstracts.info/2019/918.pdf. Return to text.
- Erickson, T.M., Kirkland, C.L., Timms, N.E., Cavosie, A.J. and Davison, T.M., Precise radiometric age establishes Yarrabubba, Western Australia, as Earth’s oldest recognised meteorite impact structure, Nature Communications 11(300), 2020 | doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13985-7. Return to text.
- Psuedotachylyte is a “dense rock produced in the compression and shear associated with intense fault movements, involving extreme mylonitization and/or partial melting” and “shows evidence of having been at high temperature”. Jackson, J.A. (Ed.), Glossary of Geology, 4th edn, American Geological Institute, Alexandria, VA, p. 518, 1997. Return to text.
- Haines, P.W., Impact cratering and distal ejecta: the Australian record, Australian J. Earth Sciences 52:481–507, 2005. Return to text.
- Macdonald, F.A., Bunting, J.A., and Cina, S.E., Yarrabubba—a large, deeply eroded impact structure in the Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia, Earth and Planetary Science Letters 213:235–247, 2003. Return to text.
- Hand, E., Shock and thaw? Earth’s oldest asteroid impact may have helped lift the planet out of a deep freeze, Science Magazine, sciencemag.org/news/2019/08/shock-and-thaw-earth-s-oldest-asteroid-impact-may-have-helped-lift-planet-outdeep, 27 August 2019. The article subsequently appeared in: Science 365(6456):852–853, 30 August 2019. Return to text.
- Horner, J.R. and Lessem, D., The Complete T. rex: How stunning new discoveries are changing our understanding of the world’s most famous dinosaur, Simon and Schuster, New York, p. 20, 1993. Return to text.
- Various constraining dates have been forwarded for the initiation, duration, and termination of the Huronian glaciations, as seen in Kopp et al., ref. 3 and Tang and Chen, ref. 4. Return to text.
- Young, G.M., Precambrian glacial deposits: their origin, tectonic setting, and key role in earth evolution; in: Menzies, J. and van der Meer, J.J.M. (Eds.), Past Glacial Environments, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 17–45, 2018. Return to text.
- Chen, Y., Chen, W., Li, Q., Santosh, M., and Li, J., Discovery of the Huronian glaciation event in China: evidence from glacigenic diamictites in the Hutuo Group in Wutai Shan, Precambrian Research 320:1–12, 2019. Return to text.
- Sekine, Y., Tajika, E., Tada, R., Hirai, T., Goto, K.T., Kuwatani, T., Goto, K., Yamamoto, S., Tachibana, S., Isozaki, Y., and Kirschvink, J.L., Manganese enrichment in the Gowganda Formation of the Huronian Supergroup: a highly oxidizing shallow-marine environment after the last Huronian glaciation, Earth and Planetary Science Letters 307(1–2):201–210, 2011. Return to text.
- Crowell, J.C., Pre-Mezosoic ice ages: their bearing on understanding the climate system, Geological Society of America Memoir 192, Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, 1999. Return to text.
Comments are automatically closed 14 days after publication.