Click here to view CMI's position on climate change.
Also Available in:
This article is from
Creation 33(2):34–35, April 2011

Browse our latest digital issue Subscribe

Spiderweb stickiness secret


Compilation: ©istockphoto.com/ExcellentPhoto; Emily Hilverts

Living creatures have a wide variety of ingenious ways of sticking to things,1 which we have written about in this magazine. These include: the fine hairs on gecko2 and spider3 feet that exploit fine chemical forces, and have inspired self-cleaning adhesive tape,4 the mechanical and hydraulic machinery of ant and bee feet5 and mussels that secrete special proteins that can even stick to “non-stick” frying pans.6

One of the best-known sticky things in nature is the spider’s web. We have written before on the amazing strength of the fibres—they are stronger than any man-made fibre of the same thickness, including Kevlar and steel,7 and are heat resistant as well.8 However, strength is not enough to trap insects—spiders also deposit tiny droplets of glue over the fibres, about 20 per mm of length. How this worked was a mystery—until biologists at the University of Akron, Ohio, USA, discovered its secret.9

Most glue is uni-functional: its one function is to stick things together. But the spider glue is multi-functional—a ‘smart material’.10 It is composed of polymers—long molecules composed of small molecules joined together—called glycoproteins, where the small molecules are amino acids and sugars. These are cross-linked, which means that forces can be transmitted efficiently—as one of the researchers said, “The success of an adhesive, however, depends on how efficiently the force is transmitted through the adhesive.”11 The crosslinking makes the droplets a hundred times stickier.

But this might be a problem when the spider wants to remove a trapped insect from the web. The solution is a variable-strength glue: much stronger at high speeds than at low speeds. Thus it can stick strongly to a flying insect, but when the insect struggles, with slower movements than flight, then the glue behaves more like a rubber band. When the insect stops moving, the spider can remove it fairly easily because the sticky force is lower still.

As usual, the researchers pay a fact-free homage to evolution, although it was irrelevant to their research. Take out such vacuous nonsense, and the researchers’ comments provide powerful evidence for design:

“Nature has evolved a myriad of well-designed adhesives that assist in locomotion, self-defence and prey capture”.

Then they list some examples in the first paragraphs.9


“Existence of similar adhesion strategies in distantly related species of animals suggests a common design principle in the evolution of natural adhesives.”11

To highlight the reality of design, human designers are now trying to learn from the spider’s secrets. One researcher said:

“This finding should significantly benefit the development of synthetic adhesives for biomedical, orthopedics and wound-healing applications. The understanding of how spiders use this unique glue will allow scientists to develop reversible adhesives that work in the presence of water.”11

This is hardly the only example of humans learning from the Master Designer12—in reality, “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of design.”13

The only remaining question is, why would God create something used to entangle insects? First, this is irrelevant to the fact of design. Second, maybe they originally entangled something else before the Fall. Even today, some baby spiders catch pollen for food,14 and there is even a vegetarian spider.15 Third, insects are likely not biblical life (Hebrew nephesh chayyah), since they were not Ark passengers—the Flood was to wipe out land creatures that breathed through nostrils (Genesis 7:22).

References and notes

  1. See Sarfati, J., By Design, chapter 7, CBP, 2008. Return to text.
  2. Great gecko glue? Creation 23(1):54–55, 2000. Return to text.
  3. Spectacular spider stickiness, Creation 27(4):54–55, 2005. Return to text.
  4. Gecko foot design—could it lead to a real ‘spiderman’? Creation 26(1):22–23, 2003. Return to text.
  5. Startling stickiness, Creation 24(2):37, 2002. Return to text.
  6. Mussel muscle, Creation 22(4):7, 2000. Return to text.
  7. God’s webspinners give chemists free lessons, Creation 23(2):20–21, 2001. Return to text.
  8. Hot spider silk, Creation 27(3):9, 2005. Return to text.
  9. Sahni, V., Blackledge, T.A., and Dhinojwala, A., Viscoelastic solids explain spider web stickiness, Nature Communications 1(19):1–4, 17 May 2010 | doi:10.1038/ncomms1019. Return to text.
  10. Lee, H., Biomaterials: Intelligent glue, Nature 465:298–299, 19 May 2010 | doi:10.1038/465298a. Return to text.
  11. Researchers discover spider webs’ true ‘sticking power’, physorg.com, 17 May 2010. Return to text.
  12. See Expert engineer eschews “evolutionary design”: Philip Bell interviews creationist and Professor of Engineering Design, Stuart Burgess, Creation 32(1): 35–37, 2010; creation.com/biomimetics. Return to text.
  13. Turning around the cliché from famous evolutionist Theodosius Dobzhansky (1900–1975), by substituting ‘design’ where he had ‘evolution’. Return to text.
  14. Pollen-eating spiders, Creation 22(3):5, 2000; White, T., Pollen-eating spiders, Nature Australia 26(7):5, Summer 1999–2000. Return to text.
  15. Catchpoole, D., Vegetarian spider, Creation 31(4):46, 2009. Return to text.

Readers’ comments

mello M.
This is an amazing article, simple and straight-forwarded skipping any technical/hard-to-pronounce terms. thank you for this.
Kathleen S.
Truly amazing. My mother always said that everything we need for sustaining ourselves and curing any disease is right here on earth. God has provided, we just sometimes have to figure it out.
L. .
I think that the articl on spiders is awe inspiring. Biomimicry website allows us to see just what people are now doing to create sustainable buildings/designs from studying God’s creation. Nature uses what it has at its disposal, makes what it needs and when its function is not required any longer it recycles it and so the circle of live continues with no toxic waste. It is also great that God is actually getting the glory for His design.
Paula S.
I must be the world’s worst arachnophobe … even the picture of the spider on the screen made me cringe and pick my feet off the floor … but these kinds of articles are fascinating! Even though I would sooner stomp on a spider as study it (okay, to be honest it would be more like scream for my husband to stomp on the spider), I remain completely amazed at how God equipped even the creepiest of critters with such beautifully designed means of survival. The engineering of the web structure alone is fascinating, add the highly technical glue and spiders become almost respectable … almost.
Jack C.
So, which came first? The spider or the spider’s web? Of course, we believers know the answer: the spider. Any other answer, such as it evolved from something else is just pure nonsense and so ridiculous one should be an embarrassment to true science and common sense.
Jeff M.
Dear Dr Sarfati

This is a very interesting article. Isn't the world absolutely fantastic? Who can fail to be amazed?

However, I always find articles like these merely tickle the fancy and leave me hungry for more. I wonder if you can recommend a few books that describe in detail how all these wonderful things have developed since the Fall? A crash course in baraminology perhaps?

Yours sincerely


PS: I’m sure you’ve just forgotten that Spiders are not insects.
Jonathan Sarfati
The Greatest Hoax on Earth? has some material that might help.

I haven’t forgotten that spiders are arachnids, and never said otherwise. The last paragraph was referring to the insects as the spider’s prey as not nephesh chayyah. In general, invertebrates are not nephesh chayyah, so would apply to the spiders too.
Grant D.
Nice article—people tend to overlook the complexity and the intended design of nature. As for one who loves nature, it should be clear that the earth was created just for us.

Comments are automatically closed 14 days after publication.