A further tool for building up believers.

Everyone, including scientists accept un-provable assumptions. Do we accept the Bible’s, or man’s?

Whether ‘day’ means a long period of time, the hours of daylight, or a 24-hour period, depends on the context. So what is the context of the Genesis ‘days’?

Will teaching our children that the Bible means what it plainly says cause them to fall away from the faith? Some Christians say ‘yes!’

If atheists were to argue their case with a creation-savvy philosopher, they would lose!

Attenborough presents the Galápagos islands and their animals as evidence for millions of years, but it is all much better understood as evidence for the biblical account of history.

Ambiguous, confusing, scientifically flawed, educationally faulty.

To explain echolocation without a designer, evolutionists now claim ‘200 genes had independently changed in the same way.’ This extensive homoplasy / ‘convergence’ undermines homology claims in building evolutionary trees.

Surprising findings from a study on why people chose to become atheists.

David Attenborough’s millions of years for the formation of the Galápagos islands is falsified by the recently formed Surtsey Island.

A skeptic gives advice about how to debate creationists, but he unwittingly shows the religious nature of his position.