Explore
New documentary: Dismantled: A Scientific Deconstruction of the Theory of Evolution
The online premiere has ended, but you can order the DVD or Blu-ray here.
Also Available in:
This article is from
Creation 37(3):31, July 2015

Browse our latest digital issue Subscribe

Tibetan snow lotus

A prized flower suffers ‘tall poppy’ syndrome1

by

lotus

The Tibetan Snow Lotus, Saussurea laniceps, is highly prized for its use in traditional Chinese and Tibetan medicine for the treatment of headaches, high blood pressure, and various other ailments. Every year at flowering time, Himalayan locals climb above altitudes of 4,000 metres (13,000 ft) to scour the rocky mountain slopes for it, harvesting the whole plant.

Increasingly locals have had to compete with other medicine-seekers, too, given the growing worldwide interest in alternative remedies. Tourists are also eager to souvenir rare plants from exotic locations.

Now because it’s the tallest plants that are harvested, being both easier to find and considered more potent, only the smaller plants are being left behind to produce seed. Therefore, only the smaller plants’ genes are making it through to the next generation. The result? Researchers have reported that the height of the snow lotus has nearly halved over the past century.2,3

snow-lotus

This dramatic shrinking of the Tibetan Snow Lotus is being widely heralded as an ‘evolutionary change’.4 One agency has even ranked it as #2 in their “Seven signs of evolution in action”.5 In their preamble, they wrote: “British naturalist Charles Darwin’s groundbreaking 1859 book, The Origin of Species, proposed the theory that species evolve over time through the process of natural selection.” But the Tibetan Snow Lotus6 is most certainly not an example of ‘evolution in action’, as the observed change in the lotus population is not something that can ever have turned primordial ooze into plants and zoos. That’s because here, as always, natural selection7 can only remove existing genes; it cannot create new ones. And now that the Tibetan Snow Lotus population is losing the genes for taller plants (which likely set more seed than dwarf plants), its very existence is said to be under threat.8 All of this is very bad news for those who claim to see ‘evolution in action’, as the removal of genes by natural selection and extinction in no way explains how those genes arose in the first place. The Bible, however, explains exactly who we should thank for the snow lotus’s existence—and ours.9

References and notes

  1. The tall poppy metaphor is said to derive from a demonstration by the semi-legendary last Roman king Tarquin the Proud in response to a question from his youngest son Sextus Tarquinius who was looking to cement his power in Gabii. Tarquin wordlessly went into his garden, took a stick, and symbolically swept it across his flowers, thus cutting off the heads of the tallest poppies that were growing there. Sextus realised that his father wished him to put to death all of the most eminent people of Gabii, which he then did. Return to text.
  2. Law, W. and Salick, J., Human-induced dwarfing of Himalayan snow lotus, Saussurea laniceps (Asteraceae), PNAS 102(29):10218–10220, 2005. Return to text.
  3. Gorman, J., The case of the shrinking lotus, nytimes.com, 5 July 2005. Return to text.
  4. Le Page, M., Unnatural selection—Humans have become the biggest force in evolution, New Scientist 210(2810):32–37, 30 April 2011. Return to text.
  5. 7 signs of evolution in action—indications that species evolve through a process of natural selection, nbcnews.com, acc. 9 October 2014. (For a rebuttal see: Walker, T., MSNBC’s seven signs of evolution all point to creation, creation.com/nbc-7signs, 28 May 2009.) Return to text.
  6. Along with all other claimed examples of ‘evolutionary’ changes in living things—see creation.com/selection. Return to text.
  7. The snow lotus case study is an example of ‘conscious or unconscious human-induced natural selection’. Return to text.
  8. That phenomenon has been observed in fish populations, too. The smaller fish that escape fishermen’s nets have fewer, weaker offspring than their larger counterparts—see creation.com/smaller-fishReturn to text.
  9. For example, Genesis 1:11–13, 26–28. Return to text.

Helpful Resources

The Greatest Hoax on Earth?
by Dr Jonathan Sarfati
US $16.00
Soft Cover
Refuting Evolution
by Jonathan Sarfati
US $12.00
Soft Cover
Evolution's Achilles' Heels
by Nine Ph.D. scientists
US $17.00
Soft Cover

Readers’ comments

Jim M.
"One agency has even ranked it as #2 in their “Seven signs of evolution in action”."

Wow! If that's all they have to brag about - if that's the best they can come up with - their "theory" is in deep deep trouble!
Charles H.
We saw a similar thing happen with big horn sheep in Montana. Hunters always went for the largest horned sheep and now they all have smaller horns. As a farmer never thought it had anything to do with evolution just cutting the genes for larger horns out.
Wenchuan S.
Good work, but it has been published on February 13th, 2017. One article is repeatedly published, I occasionally see this on your website. In my personnal opinion, past articles may not fit for updated contents.
Don Batten
We only republish articles that are still current. For those that are not, but are on creation.com for archival purposes, we endeavour to place corrections and caveats on them to alert readers to any out-of-date (e.g.) aspects. This article was originally published in Creation magazine in July 2015. If we don't recycle some good articles, newer readers will likely miss out of the benefit of reading them; who would search for an article on the snow lotus, which would probably be the only way the article would be found?

Comments are automatically closed 14 days after publication.