Who is being divisive about creation?
We hope you enjoy this sneak preview from the now-released December issue of Journal
of Creation. Subscribers will be delighted by the powerful, stimulating content.
creation-compromise
Back to Topics
Yom is not an Eon
Some argue the Hebrew word yôm in Genesis 1 means a long time period because they try to fit billions of years into the Bible. Have they got a point?
Is the seventh day an eternal day?
Can Hebrews 4 justify long creation days?
The horse and the tractor
If naturalistic evolution is true, then a Creator God is redundant, as the horse and tractor analogy shows.
BioLogos, theistic evolution and the Pelagian heresy
In the debate over an historical Adam BioLogos revives an old heresy that leads to the destruction of the Gospel.
More false claims by Hugh Ross
Hugh Ross makes excuses for ignoring Refuting Compromise, and claims that YECs have ignored A Matter of Days.
End-times and Early-times
Is the debate about how we should understand Genesis just like disputes about end-times prophecy (eschatology)?
Creation in-depth: The Evangelical church
Has the evangelical church lost its ‘saltiness’ in the world by abandoning the authority of Scripture?
The Future
Christians who embrace theistic evolution or progressive creation over billions of years in the past face the problem of heat death of the universe billions of years in the future.
Nice theologians leading the church away from the truth
They may appear to be genuine shepherds, but many are leading their flocks astray.
Shame on Charisma!
The June 2003 issue of the leading Pentecostal magazine Charisma featured a shocking cover story, an error-filled puff piece about the leading ‘progressive creationist’ Hugh Ross plus a hatchet job on biblical (‘young earth’) creation.
‘Soft’ gap sophistry
Soft gappers claim Gen. 1:1–2 refers to creation of stars, galaxies and the matter of the earth, and v. 3–31 to forming and filling of earth billions of years later.