How come Adam and Eve were told to ‘replenish’ the newly created earth with their descendants if it had never been previously filled?

Timothy Keller offers some ways that Christians can accept a ‘literal’ Adam and evolutionary processes. But this compromise forces him to reinterpret key parts of Genesis.

Does Genesis imply a gap between verses 1 and 2 of chapter 1 into which Christians can fit long ages?

Despite claims to the contrary, the meaning of yôm in Genesis is not in doubt.

Many passages in Scripture require Adam to be historical. Among them is Romans 5:12–21, where a historical Adam is contrasted with the historical Jesus.

Disbelief in Genesis is a slippery slope that has caused many to fall.

Here are nine simple questions to ask your future possible pastor, youth group leader or Bible College principal to find out their view of Genesis.

As we have often stated, we regard evolution as contrary to Scripture, but Christians can still be saved despite believing in it. A guest author explains some reasons for this, including how Christians are never fully mature when saved.

We hope you enjoy this sneak preview from the now-released December issue of Journal of Creation. Subscribers will be delighted by the powerful, stimulating content.

Some argue the Hebrew word yôm in Genesis 1 means a long time period because they try to fit billions of years into the Bible. Have they got a point?

If naturalistic evolution is true, then a Creator God is redundant, as the horse and tractor analogy shows.

In the debate over an historical Adam BioLogos revives an old heresy that leads to the destruction of the Gospel.