The case against theistic evolution must not be silenced by claims that creationism brings the gospel into disrepute—on the contrary, the stakes are high and this is no time for surrender!

How come Adam and Eve were told to ‘replenish’ the newly created earth with their descendants if it had never been previously filled?

Christians who embrace theistic evolution or progressive creation over billions of years in the past face the problem of heat death of the universe billions of years in the future.

‘Gap theory’ has no exegetical basis in Scripture in both ancient Hebrew and 17th century English.

The literary framework approach to Genesis has become very popular among evangelical academics but there are many reasons why this belief is wrong.

Disbelief in Genesis is a slippery slope that has caused many to fall.

Did God save people retroactively when Jesus died on the cross? Did God curse the world for what Adam was going to do (sin) before Adam did it, as Bill Dembski claims?

Restoring a key ingredient to the life of the church makes a huge difference.

Does Genesis imply a gap between verses 1 and 2 of chapter 1 into which Christians can fit long ages?

This weekend feedback discusses the origin of the non-literal interpretation of Genesis, and who deserves the title ‘Father of Hermeneutics’.

As we have often stated, we regard evolution as contrary to Scripture, but Christians can still be saved despite believing in it. A guest author explains some reasons for this, including how Christians are never fully mature when saved.

Timothy Keller offers some ways that Christians can accept a ‘literal’ Adam and evolutionary processes. But this compromise forces him to reinterpret key parts of Genesis.