Explore
Click here to view CMI's position on climate change.
This article is from
Creation 41(4):55, October 2019

Browse our latest digital issue Subscribe

Fish giving birth?

by

fish-giving-birth
Images of the fish embryos from the scientific report.8 (A) Female stickleback’s ovaries with internally developing embryos. (B) Two developing egg clutches. (C) Removed embryos, and (D) Close-up to show developing body parts of one embryo.

Excited comments about ‘fish pregnancy’ and wild claims of ‘evolutionary leaps’ accompanied the capture by scientists in February 2019 of a female stickleback fish from waters of the Outer Hebrides.1 She was unexpectedly found to be carrying fertilized, developing fish eggs within her body. Why the fuss?

We know that most mammals give birth to live young; while birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish lay eggs, right? Well, there are some exceptions to the rule. For instance, whereas most species of lizards are oviparous (they produce eggs), a few are truly viviparous, meaning they undergo live birth—and yes, those lizards nourish their unborn babies through a type of placenta, as do mammals.2

Fish ‘pregnancy’ like this has been seen before on very rare occasions, but this is the “the first time that [such] embryos were birthed and developed into healthy adults.”3

Male seahorses do appear to give birth to miniature versions of themselves but it is the female who produces the eggs—she lays hundreds of eggs inside the male’s brood pouch where they are fertilised, then nourished as they develop into young seahorses, then squirted out into the ‘outside world’.4

The recent scientific report that captured attention and spiked imaginations concerns a single three-spined stickleback fish (Gasterosteus aculeatus), a species that is 3–4 cm (1.2–1.6 in) long at maturity. Nicknamed ‘Mary’, one news outlet exclaimed that she “appears to have leapt across a major reproductive divide on the evolutionary tree of life.”3 This, however, is overblown nonsense, as we shall see.

Many wildlife films have depicted fish reproduction: as soon as the female lays her eggs, the male fertilizes them. It’s the same story with many thousands of fish species. In Mary’s case, the researchers were both intrigued and puzzled to discover that she was carrying developing eggs inside her body.

Was this a case of a virgin birth (technically known as parthenogenesis), as occurs in creatures as diverse as aphids5 and komodo dragons?6 For a fish’s unfertilized eggs to develop inside her is unusual but certainly not unprecedented.7

Apparently, however, genetic tests ruled out this possibility.8 Instead, researchers concluded that male stickleback sperm had somehow migrated into Mary’s body, likely through the tube that serves to permit passage of the eggs to the outside, and had fertilized her yet-to-be-released eggs.

Contrary to journalistic hype, this case provides no insights into the supposed ‘evolutionary leap’ between egg-laying and live birth.3 In fact, Mary’s pregnancy was on the verge of killing her. She became so bloated that she needed a caesarean section to ‘deliver’ her tiny fish embryos—56 of these microscopic fish fry survived to become healthy adult sticklebacks, but only by being carefully reared in the lab. Sadly, Mary didn’t survive the ordeal.

References and notes

  1. Knapton, S., Thereָ’s something about Mary the stickleback: scientists baffled by ‘virgin‘ fish, telegraph.co.uk, 20 Feb 2019. Return to text.
  2. Doyle, S., Lizards moving from eggs to live birth: evolution in action? creation.com/lizardbirth, 18 Nov 2010. Return to text.
  3. Letzter, R., This fish gave evolution the finger and got pregnant, livescience.com, 21 Feb 2019. Return to text.
  4. Juhaz, D., The amazing sea horse, Creation 16(3):38–40, Jun 1994; creation.com/sea-horse. Return to text.
  5. Editors, Aphid, Encyclopaedia Britannica, brittanica.com, last modified 26 August 2016; accessed 11 Mar 2019. Return to text.
  6. Yam, P., Strange but true: Komodo Dragons show that ‘virgin births’ are possible, scientificamerican.com, 28 Dec 2006. Return to text.
  7. An instance of virgin birth in a domestic guppy was published 66 years ago: Spurway, H., Spontaneous parthenogenesis in a fish, Nature 171:437, 7 Mar 1953. More recently, DNA fingerprinting confirmed it in a wild sawfish population: Keener, A.B., Endangered fish can reproduce without mating, the-scientist.com, 1 Jun 2015. Return to text.
  8. Specifically, microsatellite analysis. Offspring included both sexes: Dean, L.L. et al., Internal embryonic development in a non-copulatory, egg-laying teleost, the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, Scientific Reports 9:2395, 20 Feb 2019. Return to text.

Helpful Resources

The Greatest Hoax on Earth?
by Dr Jonathan Sarfati
US $16.00
Soft Cover
Evolution: Good Science?
by Dominic Statham
US $13.00
Soft Cover
Evolution's Achilles' Heels
by Nine Ph.D. scientists
US $17.00
Soft Cover
Does Evolution Explain Everything About Life?
by Philip Bell & 10 Ph.D. scientists
US $10.00
Soft Cover

Readers’ comments

Maurice M.
Hi, Thanks for your article but I have been aware for many years that ommon tropical freshwater fish; Guppies, Platies and Swordtails are all viviparous - they give birth to live babies.
Philip Bell
See my response to Robert H. Also, with the benefit of hindsight, one of the statements in the article was ambiguous, namely: Fish ‘pregnancy’ like this has been seen before on very rare occasions, but this is the “the first time that [such] embryos were birthed and developed into healthy adults.”
The 'pregnancy' like this referred to the earlier statement in the article, that Mary was unexpectedly found to be carrying fertilized, developing fish eggs within her body; it was unexpected because these sticklebacks to not copulate, so scientists were very surprised indeed.
Robert H.
I'm puzzled. Granted, most fish do lay eggs, but there are exceptions. Certain fish as diverse as guppies and sharks are known to give birth to live young. So what is the big deal about the stickleback fish doing the same?
Philip Bell
While male guppies are known to inseminate females (which may store sperm and continue using them to fertilise their eggs for many months), the excitement with Mary was that she had not been with a male. In her species, Gasterosteus aculeatus, a male builds a next and lures a female to lay eggs in it, after which he fertlizes them; as is typical of so many fish. So it is, in fact, very rare is for an unfertilized egg-laying fish to be found 'pregnant' with developing embryos inside her. At the time of the report, there was speculation of this being a virgin birth (see ref. 1) but although this isn't entirely unknown (see ref. 7), it was ruled out, as the article explains. One might well ask, "so what is the big deal." As the article states, various news outlets were trumpeting this as "the supposed ‘evolutionary leap’ between egg-laying and live birth", but it was nothing of the sort of course. Unfortunately, this sort of hyped story fuels the impression given to the general public that there is biological evidence for big-picture evolution.
Roslyn E.
most kids who have aquariums have watched guppies giving birth to live young.
Philip Bell
See response to Robert H.

Comments are automatically closed 14 days after publication.