Post-Flood mutation of the KIT gene and the rise of white coloration patterns


Identifying mutations and patterns of their appearance and impact is important in furthering the biblical creation model. Genes affecting coloration are relatively easy to identify and several have been well studied. Here, variation in a gene affecting the development and movement of pigment cells, KIT, is examined. This complex gene codes for a complex protein important in a number of pathways. Many mutations have been identified in each of the species studied. Interesting examples of epigenetic modification and reversions have been documented in mice. This gene has shown up in surprising places in cats and dogs. Some mutations result in pleiotropy, although this is variable depending on genetic background, type of mutation, and location of the mutation. Mutations also result in interesting variety including white animals and white spotting phenotypes.

Wikipedia: Malene Thyssen Horses with roan coats have white hairs evenly intermingled throughout any other color. It has been mapped to the KIT locus.
Horses with roan coats have white hairs evenly intermingled throughout any other color. It has been mapped to the KIT locus.

Previously, creationist studies have pointed out the importance of evaluating genetic data to determine the types of mutations which have likely occurred throughout history. This will contribute to a deeper understanding of the role mutations play and better inform apologetic arguments as it further builds the creation model. Biblically we don’t have enough information to know the genetic variability that existed at creation. We are not told how many animals were created in each kind. Also, although there were only two humans, Eve may have carried alleles in her egg cells that differed from those in her body. However, we do have an idea of the genetic variability that could be expected after the genetic bottleneck at the Flood. Unclean animals, such as pigs, horses, and mice, survived the Flood as single breeding pairs. Thus, up to four alleles for any particular locus could have been present. For humans, a maximum of 10 alleles could have made it through unless Noah’s sons carried mutations.

Genes affecting coat color are relatively easy to discover and study since they obviously affect the appearance of the animal. So far, well over three hundred genes have been identified as affecting coat color in mammals.1 Some of these, such as the MC1R2 and ASIP3 genes, have been fairly well studied and useful information has been obtained by examining mutation patterns at these loci. Mutations in these genes affect proteins involved in the signaling pathway for pigment production and explain a large amount of the color variation in mammals. Other genes affecting coloration are involved in pigment production or development (i.e. regulating the development and migration of pigment cells during embryogenesis).

The KIT locus

One locus important in embryogenesis, KIT, has been associated with white coat patterns in several mammalian species and piebaldism in humans. The white areas are depigmented due to the absence of melanocytes, the cell type which produces pigment.

KIT has also gone by several other names including c-kit, v-kit Hardy-Zuckerman 4 feline sarcoma viral oncogene homolog, stem cell factor receptor, mast cell growth factor receptor, and CD117.4 It encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase involved in the development and homeostasis of several cell lines including melanocytic (pigment), hematologic (blood), mast, and germ cells.5 This explains why heritable loss-of-function mutations sometimes have pleiotropic effects, not only resulting in white color patterns, but also anemia and/or infertility. Some of the stronger mutations cause a dominant white phenotype which is lethal in the homozygous condition. Activating (gain-of-function) mutations, which are generally somatic and not heritable, have been associated with progression in certain cancers.6

The KIT gene is rather complex consisting of 21 exons in a 70 kb region. Most of the exons are relatively short (<300 bp). The exception is the final exon which not only codes the terminal portion of the receptor, but also includes a 2,147 bp non-coding sequence that follows. This complex organization of the gene reflects the complex nature of the protein receptor it produces.

Extracellularly the receptor is made up of five immunoglobulin-like domains. Each is coded by one or two exons with the boundaries of the exons defining the boundaries of these domains. The receptor makes a single pass through the cell membrane and contains an intracellular kinase catalytic region divided by a hydrophilic insert. Most of the 10 exons coding the intracellular portion correspond to specific structural elements, such as α-helices or β-sheets.7 Both mice and men express two isoforms of this membrane-bound receptor8 from alternative splicing; these isoforms differ somewhat in their signaling characteristics.9

Expression of KIT and its ligand, sometimes referred to as stem cell factor, occur in waves during development and have intricate homeostatic patterns in the adult. Ligand binding induces activation of tyrosine kinase through dimerization of receptors.6 This subsequently influences a variety of pathways downstream. The pattern of downstream activation is dependent on numerous other cellular factors. Thus, the receptor does not behave as a simple on/off switch, but instead as an “inducible and malleable scaffold upon which multiple cellular regulatory mechanisms can be modulated.”10

Variability in the KIT locus

Variability in the KIT locus will be examined with the following questions in mind. Is there evidence for mutation in this gene? If so, what type(s) of mutations occur and what effect do they have on phenotype? Are the mutations most likely pre- or post-Flood? Are there any particularly unusual patterns that exist in regard to these mutations (e.g. in type, timing and/or location)?

Pigs (Sus scrofa)

KIT resides on the short arm of chromosome 8 in the pig (SSC 8p12). At least eight different alleles have been identified (table 1).11 The wild type (i) was identified in the European wild boar and most colored domestic European breeds. The belted phenotype (IBe) of the Hampshire was mapped to this locus and is believed to be the result of a regulatory mutation. This dominant allele, which produces a white belt around the shoulders and front legs, is carried in the homozygous state with no apparent ill effects.

Table 1. Summary of KIT mutations in pigs associated with white or partial white phenotypes

i wild type European wild boar NA
IBe white belt Hampshire unknown dominant
IP patch Pietrain gene duplication semidominant
I1 white Large White IP allele with splice mutation in one copy dominant
I2 white Large White I1 allele with an additional duplication of the normal gene dominant
I3 white Large White I1 allele with an additional duplication of the copy with a splice mutation dominant
RC1 white Chinese White Rongchang V84M, R173K, V893A recessive
RC2 white Chinese White Rongchang V84M, V893A recessive

The patch allele (IP), a semidominant mutation resulting from a gene duplication, produces a phenotype of white and colored patches that are separated by sharp borders. There are three related dominant white alleles (I1, I2 and I3). The first was discovered to have the same gene duplication as the patch allele with one copy containing a splice mutation. The splice mutation is the result of a G to A substitution in the first nucleotide of intron 17 which leads to skipping exon 17.12 The second and third alleles contain an additional duplication of the copy without and with the splice mutation, respectively.13 Despite the fact that dominant white alleles in other species can be lethal in the homozygote, these very popular white pigs are generally homozygous and show no ill effects.

Two additional alleles have been identified in the Chinese White Rongchang. These lacked the gene duplication and differed from the sequence in European pigs by up to 10 nucleotide substitutions. Three amino acids are affected (V84M, R173K, and V893A) from exons 2, 3, and 19 respectively. The first was considered worthy of further investigation in potentially being associated with the recessive white phenotype in these Chinese pigs.14

Since pigs are unclean, a maximum of four KIT alleles would have been carried by the pair on the Ark. The number of alleles in domestic pigs is at least twice this, indicating that new alleles have arisen post-Flood by mutation at this locus. Researchers identify mutations as a change in nucleotide sequence relative to the wild type, which in this case is the European wild boar. In reality, the wild boar itself may carry mutations, but there are other details that can sometimes help to identify alleles carrying mutations. Alleles responsible for impaired migration of melanocytes, resulting in white coloration, can logically be inferred to carry mutations. This would include the mutations found in European domestic pig breeds, but not necessarily all polymorphisms in the Chinese White Rongchang. Most likely all of the mutations affecting coloration are post-Flood since these alleles don’t appear to be widely distributed in pigs. If the alleles were older and existed at the time of the population bottleneck, a much wider distribution would be predicted.

There is an obvious bias toward gene duplications in European pigs. Four alleles contain gene duplications, suggesting at least three separate duplication events affecting the germ-line, thus making them heritable. It was suggested that the initial duplication acts as a dynamic mutation, increasing the chance of a subsequent event. Increased sequence homology resulting from the duplication is believed to increase the probability of additional rounds of gene conversion, unequal crossing-over, and subsequent rearrangement.15

Horses (Equus caballus)

KIT resides on the long arm of chromosome 3 in the horse (ECA 3q).16 There are over 15 alleles; 14 of which are associated with some degree of depigmentation (white or white spotted phenotype).17 Roan horses are characterized by white hairs interspersed with pigmented hairs throughout much of the body. This dominant phenotype is assumed to be lethal in the homozygote. It has been mapped to the KIT locus, although the causative mutation has yet to be identified. Interestingly, some mRNA transcripts from a roan Belgian horse contained a 79 bp L1 element between exons 1 and 2. This resulted in a frame-shift and a non-functional protein. However, this L1 insertion was found in both roan and non-roan horses, although it was more common in the former.18

The Tobiano color pattern typically consists of large white patches on the body and limbs which often extend across the dorsal midline. It is common among American Paint Horses and is found in other diverse breeds as well. Although no differences exist in the coding region of KIT, similarity was noted between this phenotype and several spotting patterns in mice that involved chromosomal rearrangements near this gene. Subsequently, a large paracentric chromosomal inversion was identified about 100 kb downstream from KIT which is suspected to disrupt regulatory sequences for the gene resulting in this dominant white spotting pattern. This allele was identified in Tobiano individuals from 12 different breeds, indicating an ancient origin. Homozygous individuals are phenotypically indistinguishable from heterozygotes; both are fully viable.19

The Sabino white spotting pattern involves white patches on the face and legs which may extend up to the belly. Sometimes the belly and midsection have a more diffuse scattering of white hairs similar to the roan phenotype. One allele causing this phenotype was discovered with a T to A substitution in intron 16. This resulted in many transcripts missing exon 17. Homozygotes had more pronounced expression of the defective transcript and a white phenotype, but were fully viable. Also, heterozygotes that carried a second allele for a different spotting pattern, such as Tobiano, were white as well.20

There are eleven additional alleles that have been identified in horses with white or partial white phenotypes, all of which arose within the last 100 years. Three of these involve splice mutations in an intron, two involve a deletion in an exon resulting in a frameshift and premature stop codon, four involve non-synonymous substitutions which change the amino acid (missense mutation), and two involve non-synonymous substitutions which replace the amino acid with a stop codon (nonsense mutation). Some of these are associated with a dominant white phenotype which is believed to be lethal in the homozygous state. While none of the mutations were found in the homozygous state, not all resulted in a dominant white phenotype. Furthermore, in four cases only one white horse, presumably the founder animal, was tested. It remains to be seen which of these alleles may allow for viable homozygotes.17

Considerably more than four KIT alleles are present in horses, indicating an increase in alleles due to post-Flood mutation. Of the 14 alleles associated with depigmentation, and thus most likely the result of mutation, the origin of 11 were documented in the last 100 years. The other three appear to be older as they have a wider distribution in domestic horses. Still, it is likely that they are post-Flood since they do not appear to be present extensively in the equine baramin (which includes donkeys and zebras).

Mice (Mus musculus)

In laboratory mice Kit21 is on chromosome 5 (MMU 5). There are 97 alleles, 66 of which arose via spontaneous mutation.22 These alleles, only some of which have had the underlying mutation identified, show a variety of phenotypes and pleiotropic effects. Only a few will be discussed here.

The dominant white spotting allele (W) in heterozygous mice results in fully viable and fertile adults with a white belly spot, white feet and tail tip. It was noted that in the early post-natal period these mice have unusual blood values. This allele in the homozygous condition is usually lethal due to severe macrocytic anemia. Few homozygotes are born alive, and those normally die within a day or two. The very few that survive to adulthood are black-eyed, white, severely anemic, and sterile. The difference in viability of homozygotes has been attributed to the different genetic backgrounds in which it occurs.23 The allele is attributed to a G to A substitution at a splice donor site in intron 10 which results in exon skipping in the transmembrane region.24,7

A viable dominant white spotting allele exists (Wv) where a white belly spot, white feet and tail tip are also seen along with significant dilution of the remaining coat pigment. Heterozygous mice are usually viable and fertile, but slightly anemic. In the homozygote the lifespan is near normal; they are black-eyed, white, less anemic than dominant white (W/W) mice, and may be semi-fertile.23 This allele carries a single missense (T660M) mutation.25 A number of other alleles were found that result in a similar phenotype to W (Wa, Wj, Wx) or Wv (Wb, We).23

Initially it appeared that mutations in mice had a similar effect on all three tissue types: melanocytic, hematologic and germ. However, mutations appeared that soon showed this was not always the case. For example, the fertile white mutation (Wf) appears to be the result of a missense (R816W) mutation in this gene. It is associated with anemia and pigment defects, but mice are fertile even in the homozygote (if it survives; there is an increased postnatal fatality rate).26 In contrast, an induced mutation (Y719F), which alters the binding site for the p85 subunit of PI 3-kinase, has a negative effect on spermatogenesis and oogenesis, yet no observable pigment or hematopoietic defects.27

Several alleles have been identified where the mutations involve major rearrangements in the 5' regulatory region of this gene. W57 carries an 80 kb deletion in the 5' region; homozygotes have an irregular white band on the trunk, a white head spot, very mild anemia, and normal fertility. The white banded (Wbd)28 and sash (Wsh)29 alleles arose separately by spontaneous mutation involving a large 5' inversion affecting the orientation of numerous upstream genes. Heterozygotes carry a white band or sash on the trunk; homozygotes exhibit black eyes, white fur with possible residual ear and snout pigment, with normal fertility and red blood cell parameters. All three alleles are associated with mast cell deficiency from a lack of KIT expression. Interestingly, the Wsh allele is associated with increased Kit expression in dermatomal cells during embryonic development which is believed to cause the pigmentation defects.30 This is in contrast to W57 where KIT expression is down regulated in early trunk melanoblasts.28 Several tissue specific control elements have been identified in this upstream region.30

A cryptic promoter has been identified in exon 16 which is active in post-meiotic germ cells in the testes of mice. This cell specific promoter is only active during a short temporal window during spermatogenesis and results in a third gene product: a truncated protein which lacks the extracellular, transmembrane and first tyrosine kinase domains.31 This truncated protein is suspected to play a role in fertilization since it has been observed to trigger parthenogenetic completion of meiosis II and pronuclear formation when microinjected into mouse eggs.32

Reverse mutations are considered to be rare in mammals, but 12 mutations affecting pigmentation in mice show unusual phenotypic instabilities. One of these, the viable yellow at the Agouti locus, has been examined in previous creationist literature.3 Seven of these mutations are at the KIT locus (Wa, WJ2, W37, W42, Wei, Wv = W55, Wrio). Mice heterozygous for the Wrio mutation are mostly white with some scattered pigmented hairs. In a French study, 3.6% of the heterozygotes exhibited strongly pigmented spots on a typical mutant background nearly devoid of pigment cells. Melanocyte cell lines were established from six independent reversion spots. Three of these appear to have undergone somatic reversion via mitotic recombination. One showed an increase in KIT expression and response to KIT ligand despite retaining a Wrio/+ genotype. The remaining two failed to respond to Kit ligand. While the underlying mechanism for phenotypic reversion was not demonstrated in the last three cell lines, the authors suggest that enhanced KIT expression, compensatory mutation, and/or another receptor tyrosine kinase in a similar pathway could compensate for KIT mutations on some genetic backgrounds.33

There is evidence that epigenetic inheritance can occur at this locus. Unlike the epigenetic inheritance described at the Agouti locus,3 this does not appear to be associated with DNA methylation. It occurs in offspring of mice heterozygous for a targeted gene mutation (KITtm1Alf), which contains a lacZ insertion in the first exon. The homozygous wild type offspring retain, to a variable extent, the mutant phenotype of white feet and tail tip from a marked decrease in mature mRNA. Additionally, continued expression of full length KIT mRNA and increased expression of the truncated KIT mRNA during the post meiotic phase of sperm formation were observed in mice heterozygous for the mutant gene and in paramutated mice. These gene products were detected in mature sperm as well. Suspecting that the presence of this RNA might induce the mutant phenotype, researchers microinjected total RNA from heterozygotes into fertilized eggs which induced the mutant phenotype about half the time.34


In humans KIT resides on chromosome 4 (4q12). Loss-of-function mutations at this locus are associated with a condition known as piebaldism, a dominant disorder characterized by patches of white skin on the forehead, abdomen, and/or limbs. Thus far, nearly 50 different alleles have been identified in people exhibiting piebaldism including: 28 missense mutations, 5 splice mutations, 9 small deletions, 4 large deletions, and two small insertions.35 The extent of depigmentation tends to correlate with the region where the mutation occurs. Generally, mutations affecting the extracellular region of KIT are milder while those affecting the intracellular region are more severe.36 The explanation for this is that mutations in the intracellular region generally prevent the receptor from transmitting the signal while retaining the extracellular site used to bind its ligand and induce dimerization.37 In other words, these mutant receptors can tie up normal receptors because they can still form dimers with them; this results in a dominant negative effect. Mutations affecting the extracellular region appear to prevent the mutant receptor from forming dimers and only haploinsufficency results. Unlike similar mutations in the mouse, anemia and fertility problems are not associated with piebaldism in humans.38

Gain-of-function mutations have also been identified in KIT. Many of these are somatic mutations associated with sporadic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Most of these mutations occur in exon 11 which codes the juxtamembrane domain of KIT. This intracellular region precedes the first tyrosine kinase domain and is believed to be important in dimerization. Less commonly, specific mutations in exons 9, 13 and 17 have been identified. These regions code for portions of the extracellular region, first tyrosine kinase (TK) domain, and second TK domain, respectively.

Germline gain-of-function KIT mutations have been identified in a dozen families and are associated with multiple GISTs. Mutation in the juxtamembrane domain is present in eight of these families. Among the remaining families mutations have been identified affecting the extracellular region, the first TK domain, and the second TK domain. Patients in some families also exhibit hyperpigmentation in certain regions of the body and/or mast cell tumors.39 A maximum of 10 alleles would be expected to make it through the Flood in humans, unless Noah’s sons carried mutations. Considering both gain- and loss-of-function heritable mutations, more than 60 alleles have been identified to date. All are rare and would be post-Flood. While the data in mice tended to emphasize the importance of genetic background on the severity of the phenotype for any particular mutation, the human data highlights the importance of the location of the mutation in understanding its influence on phenotype.

Other interesting patterns

KIT has a propensity to show up in unusual places. For example, an acute transforming feline retrovirus, Hardy-Zuckerman 4 feline sarcoma virus, was identified with the oncogene v-kit in its genome. This virus induces multicentric fibrosarcomas in the domestic cat. Compared to the cellular form (often called c-kit) there are some deletions at either end of the gene as well as a few point mutations.40

KIT has also been identified on the B chromosomes in the fox and raccoon dog. B chromosomes are supernumerary chromosomes, often rich in repetitive DNA, present in the karyotypes of some species. This was the first instance of a coding gene identified on a B chromosome. It is possible this gene could be transcribed as it includes a significant 5' region where transcription regulatory sequences would be expected to reside.41


KIT is an amazingly complex gene important in a number of critical pathways. Clearly there has been an increase in the alleles at this locus for the species examined here. The vast majority of these alleles are clearly the result of mutation given how they affect the function of the receptor. There is considerable diversity in the types of mutations found at this locus. Unlike the previously studied receptor involved in coloration, the MC1R, KIT mutations are more likely to have pleiotropic effects. Pleiotropy is affected by genetic background and the location and type of mutation.

Pleiotropy was best documented in mice. There may be several reasons for this. First, laboratory mice are often highly inbred. Possibly some lines carry other mutations impairing their ability to compensate for the loss of KIT. Rodents in general seem to have a propensity for rather rapid genetic change, and this may come at a cost of being less able to compensate for future mutations. Second, mice are relatively easy to study in detail and some of the documented pleiotropy could be from increased scrutiny of these laboratory animals. It was interesting that pleiotropy was virtually absent in pigs, where gene duplication involving KIT was identified in many alleles.

Interestingly, the number of human KIT alleles identified is comparable to the number documented for human MC1R alleles.42 Many of these alleles are quite rare, but were identified because of color differences. While there are suspected advantages to some mutant MC1R alleles in certain environments, no similar situation has been proposed for KIT alleles in humans.43 The lack of documented pleiotropy for most human KIT mutations suggests that other factors are able to compensate for the loss of KIT. It is also possible that mild pleitropy associated with loss-of-function KIT alleles may be identified with further scrutiny.

One final observation about KIT mutations is their association with interesting variety. White horses have been admired throughout history and are important in biblical prophecy. White sows are very popular because of their high productivity and good mothering ability. White coloration in animals and a white forelock in humans certainly add to the variety and beauty found in creation.


  1. The European Society of Pigment Cell Research Color Genes Database,, retrieved 19 February 2010. Return to text.
  2. Lightner, J.K., Genetics of coat color I: The melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R), Answers Research Journal 1:109–116, 2008;, retrieved 16 February 2010. Return to text.
  3. Lightner, J.K., Genetics of coat color II: The agouti signaling protein (ASIP) Gene, Answers Research Journal 2:79–84;, retrieved 16 February 2010. Return to text.
  4. The NCBI Gene Database,, retrieved 19 February 2010. Return to text.
  5. Grichnik, J.M., Kit and melanocyte migration, Journal of Investigative Dermatology 126:945–947, 2006;, retrieved 16 February 2010. Return to text.
  6. Alexeev, V. and Yoon, K., Distinctive role of the cKit receptor tyrosins kinase signaling in mammalian melanocytes, Journal of Investigative Dermatology 126:1102–1110, 2006. Return to text.
  7. Chu, T.Y. and Besmer, P., The genomic structure of the proto-oncogene c-kit Encoded at the murine White Spotting locus, Journal of Biomedical Science 2(1):36–45, 1995. Return to text.
  8. There is evidence that in humans further cleavage results in a soluble form of KIT that acts as a decoy receptor modulating the effect of KIT ligand. It appears to affect the regulation of pigmentation in humans, but it is not as well studied as other components. It is a bit tangential to this discussion and will not be directly addressed in this article. Kasamatsu, S., Hachiya, A., Higuchi, K., Ohuchi, A., Kitahara, T. and Boissy, R.E., Production of the soluble form of KIT, s-KIT, abolishes stem cell factor-induced melanogenesis in human melanocytes, Journal of Investigative Dermatology 128:1763–1772, 2008. Return to text.
  9. Caruana, G., Cambareri, A.C. and Ashman, L.K., Isoforms of c-KIT differ in activation of signaling pathways and transformation of NIH3T3 fibroblasts, Oncogene 18:5573–5581, 1999. Return to text.
  10. Grichnik, ref. 5, p. 945. Return to text.
  11. The NCBI Gene Database,$=databasead&logdbfrom=nuccore, retrieved 19 February 2010. Return to text.
  12. Marklund, S., Kijas, J., Rodriguez-Martinez, H., Rönnstrand, L., Funa, K., Moller, M., Lange, D., Edfors-Lilja, I. and Andersson, L., Molecular basis for the dominant white phenotype in the domestic pig, Genome Research 8:826–833, 1998. Return to text.
  13. Pielberg, G., Olsson, C., Syvänen, A.-C. and Andersson, L., Unexpected high allelic diversity ant the KIT locus causing dominant white color in the domestic pig, Genetics 160:305–311, 2002. Return to text.
  14. Lai, F., Ren, J., Ai, H., Ding, N., Ma, J., Zeng, D., Chen, C., Guo, Y. and Huang, L., Chinese White Rongchang pig does not have the dominant white allele of KIT but Has the dominant black allele of MC1R, Jouranl of Heredity 98(1):84–87, 2007. Return to text.
  15. Fontanesi, L., D’ Alessandro, E., Scotti, E., Liotta, L., Crovetti, A., Chiofalo, V. and Russo, V., Genetic heterogeneity and selection signature at the KIT gene in pigs showing different coat colours and patterns, Animal Genetics no. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02054.x. Return to text.
  16. The NCBI Gene Database,$=databasead&logdbfrom=nuccore, retrieved 26 February 2010. Return to text.
  17. Haase, B., Brooks, S.A., Tozaki, T., Burger, D., Poncet, P.-A., Rieder, S., Hasegawa, T., Penedo, C. and Leeb, T., Seven novel KIT mutations in horses with white coat color phenotypes, Animal Genetics 40(5):623–629, 2009. Return to text.
  18. Marklund, S., Moller, M., Sandberg, K. and Andersson, L., Close association between sequence polymorphism in the KIT gene and the roan coat color in horses, Mammalian Genome 10:283–288, 1999. Return to text.
  19. Brooks, S.A., Lear, T.L., Adelson, D.L. and Bailey, E., A chromosome inversion near the KIT gene and Tobiano spotting pattern in horses, Cytogenetic and Genome Research 119:225–230, 2007. Return to text.
  20. Brooks, S. and Bailey, E., Exon skipping in the KIT gene causes a Sabino spotting pattern in horses, Mammalian Genome 16:893–902, 2005. Return to text.
  21. By convention, genes in mice are generally written with lowercase letters rather than all caps. Return to text.
  22. This leaves 31 alleles that were induced by mutagens (chemical or radiation) or targeting. It does not include the 36 gene-trapped alleles in cell lines. Mouse Genome Database (MGD), Mouse Genome Informatics, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine,, retrieved 2 March 2010. Return to text.
  23. Geissler, E.N., McFarland, E.C. and Russell, E.S., Analysis of pleiotropism at the dominant white-spotting (W) locus of the house mouse: a description of ten new W alleles, Genetics 97:337–361, 1981. Return to text.
  24. Mouse Genome Database (MGD), Mouse Genome Informatics, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, retrieved 6 March 2010. Return to text.
  25. Mouse Genome Database (MGD), Mouse Genome Informatics, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine,, retrieved 6 March 2010. Return to text.
  26. Mouse Genome Database (MGD), Mouse Genome Informatics, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine,, retrieved 6 March 2010. Return to text.
  27. Kissel, H., Timokhina, I., Hardy, M.P., Rothschild, G., Tajima, Y., Soares, V., Angeles, M., Whitlow, S.R., Manova, K. and Besmer, P., Point mutation in Kit receptor tyrosine kinase reveals essential roles for Kit signaling in spermatogenesis and oogenesis without affecting other Kit responses, The EMBO Journal 19(6):1312–1326, 2000. Return to text.
  28. Klüppel, M., Nagle, D.L., Bucan, M. and Bernstein, A., Long-range genomic rearrangements upstream of Kit dysregulate the developmental pattern of Kit expression in W57 and Wbanded mice and interfere with distinct steps in melanocyte development, Development 124:65–77, 1997. Return to text.
  29. Nigrovic, P.A., Gray, D.H.D., Jones, T., Hallgren, J., Kuo, F.C., Chaletzky, B., Gurish, M., Mathis, D., Benoist, C. and Lee, D.M., Genetic inversion in mast cell-deficient Wsh mice interrupts Corin and manifests as hematopoetic and cardiac aberrancy, The Journal of Experimental Medicine 204(12):2797–2802. Return to text.
  30. Berrozpe, G., Timokhina, I., Yuki, S., Tajima, Y., Ono, M., Zelenetz, A.D. and Besmer, P., The Wsh, W57, and Ph Kit expression mutations define tissue-specific control elements located between -23 and -154 kb upstream of Kit, Blood 94(8):2658–2666, 1999. Return to text.
  31. Albanes, C., Geremia, R., Giorgio, M., Dolci, S., Sette, C. and Rossi, P., A cell- and development stage-specific promoter drives the expression of a truncated c-kit protein during mouse spermatid elongation, Development 122:1291–1302, 1996. Return to text.
  32. Rossi, P., Dolci, S., Sette, C. and Geremia, R., Molecular mechanisms utilized by alternative c-kit gene products in the control of spermatogonial proliferation and sperm-mediated egg activation, Andrologia 35(1):71–78, 2003. Return to text.
  33. De Sepulveda, P., Guenet, J.L. and Panthier, J.J., Phenotypic reversions at the W/Kit locus mediated by mitotic recombination in mice, Molecular and Cellular Biology 15(11):5898–5905, 1995. Return to text.
  34. Rassoulzadegan, M., Grandjean, V., Gounon, P., Vincent, S., Gillot, I. and Cuzin, F., RNA-mediated non-mendelian inheritance of an epigenetic change in the mouse, Nature 441:469–474, 2006. Return to text.
  35. Yin, X.Y., Ren, Y.Q., Yang, S., Xu, S.X., Zhou, F.S., Du, W.H., Lin, D., Wang, P.G., Zhang, S.M. and Zhang, X.J., A novel KIT missense mutation in one Chinese family with piebaldism, Arch Dermatol Res.301(5):387–389, 2009; and Oiso, N., Kishida, K., Fukai, K., Motokawa, T., Hosomi, N., Suzuki, T., Mitsuhashi, Y., Tsuboi, R. and Kawada, A., A Japanese piebald patient with auburn hair color associated with a novel mutation p.P832L in the KIT gene and a homozygous variant p.I120T in the MC1R gene, Br J Dermatol 161(2):468–469, 2009. Return to text.
  36. Murakami, T., Fukai, K., Oiso, N., Hosomi, N., Kato, A., Garganta, C., Barnicoat, A., Poppelaars, F., Aquaron, R., Paller, A.S. and Ishii, M., New KIT mutations in patients with piebaldism, J Dermatol Sci. 35(1):29–33, 2004. Return to text.
  37. Lemmon, M.A., Pinchasi, D., Zhou, M., Lax, I. and Sclessinger, J., Kit receptor dimerization is driven by bivalent binding of stem call factor, J Biol Chem 272(10):6311–6317, 1997. Return to text.
  38. Spritz, R.A., Lack of apparent hematological abnormalities in human patients with c-kit (stem cell factor receptor) gene mutations, Blood 79(9):2497–2499, 1992. Return to text.
  39. Isozaki, K. and Hirota, S., Gain-of-function mutations of receptor tyrosine kinases in gastrointestinal stromal tumors, Current Genomics 7:469–475, 2006. Return to text.
  40. Qiu, F., Ray, P., Brown, K., Barker, P.E., Jhanwar, S., Ruddle, F.H. and Besmer, P., Primary structure of c-kit: relationship with the CSF-1/PDGF receptor kinase family – oncogenic activation of v-kit involves deletion of extracellular domain and C terminus, The EMBO Journal 7(40):1003–1011, 1988. Return to text.
  41. Yudkin, D.V., Trifonov, V.A., Kukekova, A.V., Vorobieva, N.V., Rubtsova, N.V., Yang, F., Acland, G.M., Ferguson-Smith, M.A. and Graphodatsky, A.S., Mapping of KIT adjacent sequences on canid autosomes and B chromosomes, Cytogenetic and Genome Research 116:100–103, 2007. Return to text.
  42. García-Borrón, J.C., Sánchez-Laorden, B.L. and Jiménez-Cervantes, C., Melanocortin-1 receptor structure and functional regulation, Pigment Cell Research 18:393–410, 2005. Return to text.
  43. There was a study done in horses suggesting that white coloration was less attractive to blood-sucking tabanid flies, which can transmit disease in mammals. Horváth, G., Blahó, M., Kriska, G., Hegedüs, R., Gerics, B., Farkas, R. and Åkesson, S., An unexpected advantage of whiteness in horses: the most horsefly-proof horse has a depolarized white coat, Proc. R. Soc. B 277:1643–1650, 2010. Return to text.

Helpful Resources

Reader’s comments

Dr Will W.
I'd argue that duplication of an allele, followed by divergence of one of the copies (as Dr. Lightner describes has occurred in swine), qualifies as an increase in information. Neatly enough, this situation may well explain why pleiotropism hasn't been noted for the swine "patch" KIT mutants. The situation makes a fine thought experiment demonstrating why gene duplication is widely regarded as a likely solution to what Dr. Batten suggests is the "very problematic" issue of evolutionary restraint due to pleiotropy.

I look forward to Dr. Lightner eventually publishing a similar analysis of the ASP gene, which provides terrific examples of recent, naturally selected mutations which have contributed to the evolution of superior camouflage patterns in multiple populations of beach mice and rock pocket mice. (I refer to recent work by H. Hoekstra and colleagues.) Perhaps she'll even cite one of my own modest papers on the subject of mouse coat color genetics. ;)
Dr Lightner
It a pleasure to hear from someone who has a background in coat color genetics. I’d like to point out some details on the duplication. According to my reference 12, the duplication in swine is believed to affect the regulatory region of the gene. The dysregulation results in some regions of pigment loss from abnormal migration of pigment cells during development. (The cells don’t show up where they belong, so no pigment can be produced there.) The splice mutation is predicted to impair the function of the receptor. Combined, they result in a more severe defect in the migration and survival of melanocytes, explaining the white phenotype in these hogs.
The evolutionary paradigm is supposed to explain more than change over time (which creationists recognize), but also the origin of information for such things as pigment cells, the biochemical pathways involved in pigment formation, and the complex pathways that allow for the pigment cells to arrive where they belong so the coat of the animal can be pigmented.
You have suggested that this gene duplication followed by mutation in one copy is new information. (Granted, depending on how one defines information, I accept that trivial amounts might result from this type of process, though I would expect this to be by intentional design of the Creator.) However, it seems to me to miss the obvious point that both the duplication and the splice mutation are disrupting the normal migration of pigment cells. Somehow the suggestion that we have new information, when the only identifiable result is loss in a complex design that previously existed, is not very compelling to me.
For the evolutionist, pleiotropy is a problem for several reasons. Building a simple pathway by naturalistic processes may work in the imagination, but there is no experimental evidence suggesting it can occur. When you have more complex pathways and considerable economy of design (e.g. polycistronic genes, specific proteins used in multiple pathways, etc.) the idea of naturalistic origins becomes even more absurd. Of course, once genes exist changes can certainly occur in them. I have written on examples of inferred gene duplication followed by mutation (in shrews and monkeys) which I believe probably did occur. However, it appears to me that this mechanism is severely limited in what it can accomplish. Pleiotropy is one factor that limits this mechanism.
The lack of pleiotropy in the hogs homozygous for a severe form of the duplication is impressive. The lack of documented pleiotropy in many of the mutations in horses and humans is also intriguing given the critical role of KIT in other pathways and how commonly pleiotropy has been documented in mice. It seems plausible that there is some redundancy, where other genes take over some of the lost function. Redundancy is a hallmark of something that is very well designed. Most people intuitively know that it takes intelligence to design something well. The information for the components of the complex biological pathways has not been adequately accounted for by evolutionists. How much more of a problem is it for evolutionists to convincingly explain the fault tolerant components of design by mindless evolutionary forces? Unfortunately, many seem to see new alleles arising via mutation as new information, and the real issue gets ignored entirely.
If you notice reference 2 and 3 in my paper, you will see I have already written on several other genes involved in coat color. In the one on ASIP I do discuss a paper by those you mention; it involves the beach mice. A more recent lay article of mine (Creation Matters 16(4):5) discusses another paper of theirs concerning deer mice. In each case there is a difference in ASIP expression associated with the shift in coat color. If this is the result of mutation, I still would not consider it new information in the sense needed to support molecules-to-man evolution. Adjusting gene expression is an essential part of life, and a change in DNA sequence isn’t required in many circumstances.
I enjoyed reading a few of your articles on this subject. They highlight many details in these complex pathways that my writings have not touched on. I find them fascinating. The impressive design keeps me impressed with the awesome God who designed them. :)
Richard M.
Kudos to Dr. Lightner for her well-researched article on the KIT gene and its effects. And thanks also for the demonstration and documentation that mutations do indeed add information to the genome and that this processes is not at all rare.
Dr Don Batten
Dr Lightner did not say this; you are putting words into her mouth. “New information”? That depends on how you define information; see Can mutations create new information? Even if these mutations can be construed to represent 'new information', mutations that corrupt an existing gene such that the coded-for (very complex) protein receptor can no longer properly control the migration of pigment cells, are hardly a model for the origin of the gene itself, or any similarly complex gene, which evolution is supposed to explain. And it is especially problematic for a gene that has multiple effects (aka pleiotropy).
Dr Lightner also raises the likelihood of redundancy, which is another huge problem for evolution.

Article comments are only available for 14 days from publication.