Also Available in:

Fossil time ranges continue to expand up and down

by

wikipedia.orgspider-monkey
Figure 1. A rare, New World brown spider monkey, Ateles hybridus, from Venezuela, northwest South America.

For the last few decades, several creationists have been reporting on the vertical expansion of fossil ranges, interpreted as either ‘older’ or ‘younger’ in the geological column timescale. These finds are probably the tip of the iceberg, since we cannot go through all the relevant journals that would report range expansions. In fact, many of these issues likely go unreported because many ‘anomalous’ or ‘uninteresting’ fossils end up in the back shelves of museum collections, as Dr Carl Werner has discovered.1 As such, it is hard to know just how large the scale of this phenomenon is, though it is almost certainly more severe than reported in any literature, secular or creationist.

Some range expansions are quite large, such as moving the time boundaries by 50 to 100 Ma or more. Some examples are: the pushing back of eukaryote evolution one billion years;2 the discovery of grass in dinosaur dung from the Mesozoic;3 ‘sophisticated’, diverse mammals now found in the Mesozoic;4 and the origin of flowering plants may have been pushed back 100 Ma.5,6 Moreover, organisms that were thought to be extinct for many millions of years are found to be living, such as the Wollemi pine found alive in New South Wales, Australia.7 Archeological discoveries also contribute to the range expansions by indicating man was always smart, making it less likely he evolved.8

Many of these range expansions are not considered too significant, being only a matter of millions of years or from a fossil that is not used as an index fossil. Nonetheless, it still indicates that the fossil record is not precisely timed as evolutionists often make it out to be. Moreover, it accentuates the problem of stasis, revealing the ad hoc nature of much evolutionary storytelling about the fossils. Essentially, it shows that evolution and deep time act more as assumptions constraining their interpretation of the fossil record than as conclusions they draw from the fossil record.

Origin of snakes pushed back 70 Ma

One of the most significant new discoveries is snake fossils that are 70 Ma older than scientists expected. This date pushes snakes back to the Middle Jurassic.9,10 A variety of snake fossils were found in four countries, suggesting an ‘origin’ many millions of years earlier.

New World monkeys pushed back 10 Ma

The New World monkeys are found alive today in South and Central America and on the Caribbean islands (figure 1). Evolutionists believe they originated from Africa. Creationists believe their ancestors came off the Ark and spread to South America after the Flood. New research pushes back their fossil record in South America by 10 Ma to the late Eocene.11 Evolutionists have come to mostly believe the New World monkeys arrived from Africa on vegetation.12 One problem for them is that the vegetation rafts observed today are quite small.

Sophisticated mammal traits continue to be pushed down into the Middle Jurassic

Sophisticated mammal fossils have been pushed back to the Middle Jurassic of the Mesozoic. Evolutionists used to claim that the Mesozoic had only rat-like mammals. But fossils that display other mammal traits are also being found in the Middle Jurassic. New fossils found in China push the climbing locomotor adaptation of mammals back to the Middle Jurassic.13 This deduction is based on the skeletal properties. It is admitted that numerous mammal traits ‘evolved’ early and independently.14 Of course, all this mammal evolution is attributed to ‘convergent evolution’. The evolution of sophisticated mammals is now compressed into a very short time. This points more to special creation than evolution which needs much time.

Well-preserved ostracods back 25 Ma earlier in Ordovician

Ostracods are small crustaceans, and are the most abundant arthropods in the fossil record. They were thought to be older than the Silurian, but the fossil record did not show any in the Ordovician. But now it is ‘certain’ since they have found fossils in the late Ordovician, extending the knowledge of well-preserved ostracods back 25 Ma.15 Amazingly even some soft parts are preserved.

This may seem like a successful evolutionary prediction. However, from a biblical perspective, the fossil record is already expected to preserve only a general order, so even such ‘expected’ range extensions are perfectly consistent with a biblical view of the fossil record. Moreover, when seen against the general trend of unexpected range extensions, the prediction is far less impressive, and itself still open to future revision.

A possible type of amniota pushed back form Late Triassic to Middle Triassic

Teeth and jaws from an enigmatic taxon, probably an amniota—reptiles, birds, and mammals—was pushed back from the Late Triassic in the US to the Middle Triassic in Germany.16

Earliest modern bandicoot and bilby pushed back 5 to 10 Ma

Bandicoots and bilbys are small marsupials living in Australia. The earliest fossils were ‘dated’ Pliocene until they were recently found in the middle Miocene of the Riversleigh World Heritage area of north-west Queensland, Australia.17 These are likely post-Flood marsupials that arrived in Australia. It does not nullify the idea that the Flood/post-Flood boundary is in the late Cenozoic, since the Miocene is late Cenozoic.18 We cannot rely on uniformitarian dating methods to determine the boundary, which can be Miocene in one location and even middle Pleistocene in another location.19

Whale echolocation pushed back

Whale echolocation works like sonar and is extremely sophisticated. Evolutionists consider that it took a long time for the complex behaviour and anatomy to evolve after whales first evolved. However, a fossil from the Oligocene, about 28 Ma ago, shows features indicative of echolocation.20 The researchers conclude:

“… that a rudimentary form of echolocation evolved in the early Oligocene, shortly after odontocetes [toothed whales] diverged from the ancestors of the filter-feeding whales (mysticetes).”21

So whales had echolocation right from the beginning. Maybe echolocation and whales did not evolve, although the researchers couch the remarkable discovery within evolution by claiming that the echolocation was ‘rudimentary’, although they give no reasons why they make this claim. How can it be rudimentary? It either works or it doesn’t. The bones show the evidence of echolocation, and the echolocation is considered rudimentary likely because of the early date of the fossil.

A type of bird pushed back 5 to 6 Ma

A large category of birds is called Ornithuromorpha. Many are extinct but the category also includes all living birds. Fossils of this bird type are found in the famous Jehol Biota in China where half the diversity of Mesozoic birds is found. This type of bird has recently been found in a lower formation within the Jehol Biota, pushing Ornithuromorpha back 5 to 6 Ma.22 This may seem insignificant, but in many cases the extensions are changing ‘inch by inch’. Over a longer period of investigation, these extensions add up and show how the fossil record looks less and less like a time series.

Dinosaur footprints push origins back around 20 Ma

It has been widely taught that dinosaurs evolved about 230 Ma ago. But there are now dinosaur tracks that date back to around 250 Ma ago, right after the massive ‘Permian extinction’.23 It is interesting that these tracks are quadrupedal, while the earliest dinosaurs are thought to have been bipedal.

Origin of pterodactyls pushed back over 5 Ma

A new pterodactyl fossil has been discovered in north-west China.24,25 It pushes back the origin of pterodactyls by more than 5 Ma.

Two new living fossils

Two new living fossils have been discovered. A certain dinoflagellate was thought extinct in at least the Atlantic Ocean in the early Pleistocene, but has been discovered recently in a warm pool in the western Pacific and Indian Oceans.26 A marine worm from the Northern Hemisphere, called Protuliphila, was thought extinct 4 Ma ago, but has been found alive and well near Picton, New Zealand.27

Conclusion

These fossil range expansions show that a precise fossil order is not yet established. When fossils are found older than expected, it shows that stasis is the predominant pattern in the fossil record, which evolution does not predict, considering that some organisms have supposedly evolved rapidly from primitive primates to humans while others have stayed essentially identical for the same period of time. In some cases, it can also show there was little time for them to ‘evolve’ and they change very little afterwards. Living fossils challenge evolution and uniformitarianism because they are not found between their last appearances and the present. This pattern of stasis and increased ranges is however perfectly consistent with seeing the fossil record as a general burial order in a single cataclysm like Noah’s Flood.

References and notes

  1. Werner, C., Living Fossils—Evolution: The Grand Experiment, vol. 2, New Leaf Press, Green Forest, AR. Return to text.
  2. Oard, M.J., Supposed eukaryote evolution pushed back one billion years, J. Creation 15(1):4, 2001. Return to text.
  3. Oard, M.J., The origin of grass pushed well back into the ‘Mesozoic’, J. Creation 21(1):9, 2007. Return to text.
  4. Oard, M.J., Jurassic mammals—more surprisingly diverse, J. Creation 21(2):10–11, 2007. Return to text.
  5. Batten, D., Pollen problems, Creation 36(2):54, 2014. Return to text.
  6. Oard, M.J., Fossil time ranges continue to be increased, J. Creation 28(3):3–4, 2014. Return to text.
  7. Wieland, C., Sensational Australian tree … like ‘finding a live dinosaur’, Creation 17(2):13, 1995. Return to text.
  8. Oard, M.J., Post-Flood man continues to become smarter, J. Creation 27(3):3, 2013. Return to text.
  9. Caldwell, M.W., Nydam, R.L., Palci, A., and Apesteguia, S., The oldest known snakes from the Middle Jurassic–Lower Cretaceous provide insights on snake evolution, Nature communications 6: 27, January 2015; doi:10.1038/ncomms 6996. Return to text.
  10. Bell, P., Standard snake evolution story stymied by spate of fossil discoveries, J. Creation 29(3):8–10, 2015. Return to text.
  11. Bond, M., Tejedor, M.F., Campbell Jr, K.E., Chornogubsky, L., Novo, N., and Goin, F., Eocene primates of South America and the African origin of New World monkeys, Nature 520:538–541, 2015. Return to text.
  12. De Queiroz, A., The Monkey’s Voyage: How Improbable Journeys Shaped the History of Life, Basic Books, New York, 2014. Return to text.
  13. Meng, Q.-J, Ji, Q., Zhang, Y.-G., Liu, D., Grossnickle, D.M., and Luo, Z.-X., An arboreal docodont from the Jurassic and mammalianform ecological diversification, Science 347:764–768, 2015. Return to text.
  14. Martin, T., Marugán-Lubón, J., Vullo, R., Martin-Abad, H., Luo, Z.-X., and Buscalioni, A.D., A cretaceous eutriconodont and integument evolution in early mammals, Nature 526:380–384, 2015. Return to text.
  15. Siveter, D.J., Tanaka, G., Farrell, U.C., Martin, M.J., Siveter, D.J., and Briggs, D.E.G., Exceptionally preserved 450-million-year-old Ordovician ostracods with brood care, Current Biology 24:801–806, 2014. Return to text.
  16. Sues, H.-D. and Schoch, R.R., First record of Colognathus (?Amniota) from the Middle Triassic of Europe, J. Vertebrate Paleontology 33(4):998–1002, 2013. Return to text.
  17. Travouillon, K.J., Hand, S.J., Archer, M., and Black, K.H., Earliest modern bandicoot and bilby (marsupialia, peramelidae, and thylacomyidae) from the Miocene of the Riversleigh World Heritage area, northwestern Queensland, Australia, J. Vertebrate Paleontology 34(2):375–382, 2014. Return to text.
  18. Oard, M.J., (ebook). The Flood/Post-Flood Boundary Is in the Late Cenozoic with Little Post-Flood Catastrophism, 2014; michael.oards.net/PostFloodBoundary.htm. Return to text.
  19. Oard, M.J., Relating the Lava Creek ash to the post-Flood boundary, J. Creation 28(1):104–113, 2014. Return to text.
  20. Geisler, J.H., Colbert, M.W., and Carew, J.L., A new fossil species supports an early origin for toothed whale echolocation, Nature 508:383–386, 2014. Return to text.
  21. Geisler et al., ref. 20, p. 383. Return to text.
  22. Wang, M., Zheng, X., O’Connor, J.K., Lloyd, G.T., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., and Zhou, Z., The oldest record of ornithuromorpha from the early Cretaceous of China, Nature Communications 6:6987, 2015; doi:10.1038/ncomms7987. Return to text.
  23. Brussatte, S.L., Niedźwiedski, G., and Butler, R.J., Footprints pull origin and diversification of dinosaur stem lineage deep into Early Triassic, Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278:1107–1113, 2011. Return to text.
  24. Andres, B., Clark, J., and Xu, X., The earliest peterodactyloid and the origin of the group, Current Biology 24:1011–1016, 2014. Return to text.
  25. Rosen, M., Oldest flying reptile, Science News 185(11):5, 2014. Return to text.
  26. Mertens, K.N., Takano, Y., Head, M.J., and Matsuoka, K., Living fossils in the Indo-Pacific warm pool: a refuge for thermophilic dinoflagellates during glaciations, Geology 42(6):531–534, 2014. Return to text.
  27. Gordon, D., Northern-hemisphere fossil discovered living in New Zealand, niwa.co.nz/news/northern-hemisphere-fossil-discovered-living-in-new-zealand, 29 May 2014. Return to text.

Helpful Resources

The Greatest Hoax on Earth?
by Dr Jonathan Sarfati
From
US $9.00
Living Fossils book
by Dr Carl Werner
From
US $30.00
Rock Solid Answers
by Michael J Oard, John K Reed
From
US $20.00
Evolution: Good Science?
by Dominic Statham
US $13.00
Soft cover

Readers’ comments

Bernard G.
Firstly, how can moving the timeline of evolution constantly back and forth prove that something evolved in the first place? It cannot, think about it. Second, how can evolution make predictions since predictions pertain to the future? Evolution claims to make predictions about the past, but wait a minute, to predict something which happened in the past "happened in the past" is tautology. Third, how can a theory which claims evolution happened also claim that evolution did not happen (i.e. living fossils like the Coelacanth and the Wollemi pine)? Why would any sane person want to believe in these lies that keep changing and yet always end up being wrong rather than believe the Word of the God who cannot be lie (Hebrews 6:18), does not change (James 1:17) and has never been proven wrong (Job 34:12)?
Col M.
When a species if found to be older or younger than expected does that mean the rock it was found in is also re-dated? And does that flow on to re-date other fossils found in those rocks?
Tas Walker
There are lots of things that can happen. It may lead to the rock being re-dated. It may also lead to rocks around it being re-dated. It may lead to the fossil being given a different name. It may lead to the dates on the geological column being changed. Or it may just mean the range is extended and nothing else changes. There are other possibilities. It's a very flexible system that can accommodate any discovery.
Mark T.
As an ex-evolutionist and returned Christian I can't believe how much Science has become a religion. When I see it from the correct way I can see the tricks and subversive ideas they use to control the world.
This article shows that they have indoctrinated the fact that we are all fallible sinners but are going for truth.
Jesus Loves You.
Craig E.
This is great material on the fossil record. CMI has so many great resources. The unfortunate thing is that when I refer people who need the information on your website, they refuse to go there. "It's a creationist website, so I wouldn't trust it." I haven't found any way to get around that objection. That confirms the aphorism, "There is no one so blind as the person who will not see."
Tas Walker
Most of the articles on creation.com are extensively referenced to secular sources. If they do not want to read material by creationists you can point them to the other places. Or you can challenge them to dig up the original sources for themselves. You could challenge them, "Do you understand the concept of critical, independent thinking? If those articles are full of errors please do me a favour, show them to me and explain the problem."
Nathan G.
The amusing thing about evolution being able to absorb any and all evidence as positive proof for itself is that evos are faced with an unenviable outcome: the infinite regress as a saving mechanism for their worldview.

Problem is: you can only go back as far as the alleged "first bacteria", before you finally have to concretely answer how life truly arose in a Godless universe. Up until now, evos do not have anything close to a scientifically testable answer, just philosophical ramblings and sophistry. Bacteria can either borrow DNA from other bacteria or destroy their own genetic material to fool the lock-and-key fit of antibiotics. Neither answers the question of origins for traits and structures in organisms.

The fossil question is just another permutation of the infinite regress problem. You can only push back the alleged beginning of life to the Cambrian Explosion, before that nasty question of life's origin can't be ignored any more. Every species brickwalls at the Cambrian Explosion, if you keep pushing back deep time unceasingly to fit all of the anomalies into your pseudo-scientific idea.

But then comes the day when you face an allegedly molten Earth without an atmosphere, oceans of water, a magnetic field, and all the other stuff necessary for life on the planet. The irony is delicious. Rock or hard place, anyone? The dynamo theory of the Earth's magnetic field turns around and bites evo in the behind. Heavy elements sink into the center of the Earth. Light elements escape into space with no magnetic field. All the sulphur boils off at less than 1000 Degrees Celsius. And life can't form until all the conditions are right. Push too hard and the Cambrian Explosion meets the molten Earth.

No time for life to form.

Silly evos. Tricks are for kids!

Comments are automatically closed 14 days after publication.