Explore
Also Available in:
This article is from
Creation 23(4):30–34, September 2001

Browse our latest digital issue Subscribe
Editor’s note: As Creation magazine has been continuously published since 1978, we are publishing some of the articles from the archives for historical interest, such as this. For teaching and sharing purposes, readers are advised to supplement these historic articles with more up-to-date ones suggested in the Related Articles below.

The collapse of ‘geologic time’

369-robert-gentry
Researcher Dr Robert Gentry

Tiny halos in coalified wood tell a story that demolishes ‘long age’.

by , Andy McIntosh, and Tas Walker

The age of things is crucial in the debate over the authority of the Bible.

Most methods that could be used for calculating the Earth’s age, even though still based on unprovable uniformitarian1 assumptions, give upper limits much less than the billions of years required for evolution.2 Evolutionists widely use radio–isotope (or radiometric) dating of rocks to support the ‘geologic time’ figure of 4.6 billion years. Notwithstanding the inherent unreliability and demonstrated inaccuracy of the radiometric dating techniques (see ‘Radiometric dating’ box below), ages of rock formations in the millions (and billions) of years are presented as fact in schools, universities and the media.

However, there is spectacular, but little-known, evidence that is completely inconsistent with the evolutionary timescale, but entirely consistent with the Biblical record of a young Earth and a catastrophic global Flood.

The evidence is provided by radio–halos in coalified wood. This work has been published in some of the best peer-reviewed scientific journals, and its strong case against evolution’s millions of years is so far unanswered by the evolutionary community.

Photos by Robert Gentry369-halo1
Figure 1. A fully-developed uranium radiohalo in biotite (dark mica). Field of view is about 80 µm (0.08 mm). A uranium halo comprises eight rings, but some rings are of similar size and cannot easily be distinguished.
369-halo2
Figure 2. Elliptical polonium-210 halos in compressed coalified wood. Length of ellipse is about 50 µm (0.05 mm).
369-halo3
Figure 3. Combined circular and elliptical halos indicate that polonium-210 continued to decay after the wood was compressed. Diameter of halo is about 50 µm.

What are radiohalos?

Radiohalos are spherical, microscopic-sized discolourations in crystals. They are found abundantly in certain minerals in Earth’s rocks, especially micas from granites. In cross-section on a microscope slide, they appear as a series of tiny concentric rings, usually surrounding a central core (Figure 1).3

This central core is (at least initially) radioactive. High energy alpha particles, emitted from the core during radioactive decay, damage the mineral and discolour it, with most of the damage occurring where the particle stops. How far this particle travels depends on its energy. Since all the alpha particles from a particular type of decay reaction have the same energy, and the particles are fired in all directions, a spherical shell of discolouration will form, appearing circular in cross-section.

Imagine shooting a bullet into a huge lump of cork. Eventually, the bullet will stop, leaving behind a ‘trail’ of damage, the length of which depends on the speed of the bullet. Different radioactive substances shoot alpha particles (‘bullets’) at different (though specific) speeds, so we can identify the substance from the diameter of the ‘sphere of damage’.4 The higher the energy of decay, the faster the speed of the ‘bullet’.

Uranium radiohalos

Radioactive uranium generates a beautiful, multi-ringed halo (Figure 1) because it decays in a number of steps. Of the 15 isotopes (or varieties of elements) in this ‘decay chain’ (see ‘Radioactive decay series’ box below), eight emit alpha particles when they decay, forming eight rings.5 It is a bit like a sequence of guns, each of different power, firing an eight-gun salute. When this salute or decay chain is fired millions of times in every direction, the bullets from the different guns make eight concentric rings.

If, instead of radioactive uranium, the core was composed of an isotope along the chain, there would be fewer rings. Omitting the first few isotopes in the decay series would be like removing the first few guns in our ‘salute’. Thus it’s quite simple to work out which isotope was originally in the core by counting the rings (see box below). Polonium-218 forms three rings, polonium-214 forms two, and polonium-210 forms only one.

Radiohalos in coalified wood

Radiohalos have also been found in logs recovered from uranium mines on the Colorado Plateau of Western USA. The logs, partially turned to coal, were found in uranium-rich sedimentary rocks from three different geological formations.

Some of these formations had previously been assigned radiometric ‘dates’ ranging from 55 to 80 million years.6 Scientists Jedwab7 and Breger8 described these halos, and Dr Robert Gentry, a world authority on radiohalos, revisited their work. Following extensive investigation, Gentry published his results in the prestigious journal Science,9 in a book10 and in a video.11

Most of the halos found in the wood had only one ring, indicating that the radioactive cores once contained polonium-210—the last radioactive isotope in the uranium-238 decay chain (see Radioactive decay series). Clearly, the wood had been saturated in uranium-rich solutions, and certain spots attracted polonium atoms (also present in these solutions), allowing small cores of polonium-210 to form. As they decayed, these cores left the characteristic polonium-210 halo.

Radioactive decay series

Diagram from John Morris, The Young Earth369-decay-series
The uranium-238 decay (238U) series. Eight of the fifteen isotopes emit an alpha particle when they decay. Letters signify the name of the element (e.g. U for uranium and PO for polonium) and the numbers indicate the mass of the atoms (e.g. 238 atomic mass units).

Radioactive isotopes have an intrinsically un­sta­ble atomic struc­ture which makes them dis­in­te­grate so that particles fly out. One way that a parent radio-active atom can decay into a daugh­ter atom is by ejecting an alpha particle from its nucleus. Sometimes the daughter element is also unstable and sub­se­quently decays into an­other unstable iso­tope, and so on in a series of steps—a ‘decay chain’.

The isotope uranium-238 starts a decay chain that disintegrates step-by-step into a stable form of lead. It involves fifteen isotopes and fourteen steps (diagram right). Different isotopes of the same element (e.g. uranium-238 and uranium-235) have a different mass but nearly identical chemical behaviour. An alpha particle is a helium nucleus with a mass of 4 atomic mass units. Thus, radioactive decay by emission of an alpha particle (e.g. uranium-238) produces a daughter isotope (thorium-234) which is 4 atomic mass units lighter.

The half-life of a radioactive isotope is the time required for half its atoms to decay. Different isotopes have different half lives (e.g. the half-life of uranium-238 is 4.5 billion years and of polonium-218 is 3 minutes).

But the solutions must have penetrated the logs relatively quickly, certainly within a year or so. How do we know that? Because the half-life of polonium-210 is only 138 days. That is, within 138 days, half the polonium-210 present would have decayed into the next ‘daughter’ isotope in the chain. In other words, the solution had saturated the wood within two or three half-lives, about a year. It could not have taken very long, because in 10 half-lives (less than four years) virtually all of the polonium-210 would have gone.

Only one of the three radioactive isotopes of polonium was deposited in the tiny radioactive specks in the logs. We know because only one ring formed. The other isotopes from the decay chain (polonium-214 and polonium-218) were missing. Why? Because they had already decayed away. Their half-lives are very short (164 millionths of a second and three minutes respectively). So all polonium-214 would have disappeared within a thousandth of a second, and all polonium-218 would have gone in an hour—long before the uranium-rich solutions could saturate the logs.

Significantly, the halos were mainly elliptical, not circular (Figure 2). Obviously, after the halos formed, the wooden logs were compressed, squashing the originally-circular halos into ellipses.

Sometimes a circular halo could be seen together with an elliptical halo (Figure 3). This indicated that radioactive polonium-210 continued to decay from the same core after the wood was compressed. Thus, because of the 138-day half-life of polonium-210 as discussed above, there was less than four years between when the solution first infiltrated the wood and when it was compressed. (The presence of the second halo at the same spot shows that much less than four years had passed before the compression event, as there was still time to produce another halo afterwards.)12

An amazing event

The wood in which these tiny elliptical halos were found speaks of a devastating flood that uprooted and smashed huge trees, depositing the debris with an enormous volume of sediment over a large area. The halos themselves tell the story of an unusual geologic event. They speak of uranium-rich solutions saturating the logs in less than a year or so, forming tiny specks of polonium, which decayed to produce circular radiohalos, which were, in much less than four years, compressed and deformed.

The story is one of exceptional geological conditions—a highly unusual sequence of events. For one thing, in the usual ‘slow and gradual’ scenarios, it would take much longer for sufficient sediment to accumulate on top to deform the wood in this way. What is really amazing and significant, however, is the fact that this elliptical halo situation has been found in three different geological formations in the same general region. Evolutionists say these formations represent three different geological periods ranging from 35 to 245 million years.13 To believe this millions-of-years timescale, we would need to believe that this amazing sequence of events (with all its precise timing) occurred three different times, separated by more than 200 million years. Clearly this is an incredible scenario. It makes more sense to believe that the sequence occurred once and that all the sedimentary formations were deposited in the same catastrophe, followed by the same earth movement causing deformation. These polonium halos collapse the ‘long ages’ of geology, and point to the unique, catastrophic Flood recorded in the Bible. Also, by the same reasoning, these halos leave little room for numerous layers of post-flood sedimentation as suggested by some authors.14

Counting the rings

369-halo-diagram
369-halo-70micronsPhoto by Robert Gentry
Different radiohalos have a different number of rings. Diameter of largest ring is about 70 µm (0.07 mm) in biotite. All four isotopes are from the uranium-238 decay series.

More confirming evidence

Further confirmation of this spectacular collapse of geologic time is provided by careful analysis of the tiny cores of some uranium halos found in the same wood samples.15 This revealed a large amount of uranium-238 but almost no lead-206.16 If the halos were millions of years old, much more ‘daughter’ lead should have been present. The scarcity of the daughter element, using the same assumptions upon which radiometric dating is based, would indicate that the halos are only several thousand years old, not millions. Similar results were obtained for halos from all three geological formations, indicating that all are approximately the same age. Again, the supposed millions of years of geologic time collapse into only a few thousand.17

369-dino-tracks

Dinosaur tracks

Fossilized dinosaur footprints have been found in these Colorado mines. In Cyprus Plateau Mine (Utah), a fossilized dinosaur footprint was found in the coal seam next to one of the many coalified logs of the plateau. In Kenilworth Mine, eight different types of dinosaur tracks were found.

The pattern of tracks suggests that the animals were fleeing from an imminent catastrophe. Nearby, a huge dinosaur graveyard has been found at Dinosaur National Monument (Vernal, Utah) in Jurassic sediments.

Obviously, the dinosaurs that made these tracks didn’t escape. The catastrophe got them. The collapse of geologic time and the young age for the rock formations confirm that these dinosaurs lived on Earth, at the same time as man, only a few thousand years ago.


Radiometric dating relies on assumptions

Radiometric dating relies on three unprovable assumptions about the past:

  1. The amount of ‘daughter’ isotope in the rock at the start is known.
  2. No loss of ‘parent’ or gain of ‘daughter’ since the rock formed (closed system conditions).
  3. Constant decay rate of ‘parent’ to ‘daughter’.

If these conditions could be guaranteed, the radiometric dating method would be correct. However, unless eye–witnesses observed the rock when it formed, and checked it constantly thereafter, it is impossible to guarantee that these assumptions are correct. Indeed, there are many cases in the scientific literature where assumptions one and two, though made in good faith, have been shown to be unreliable.

Constancy of decay rate (assumption three) implies that a parameter which scientists have been measuring for only a century has been constant for millions of alleged years of Earth’s history. This is of course not only unproven but also unprovable. Decay rates (which can vary greatly today under special conditions) may have been much faster in the past; evidence suggesting this is now being analyzed by a creationist consortium.1 A good summary of the documented inconsistencies and inaccuracies of radiometric dating is given by Woodmorappe.2

  1. Vardiman, L., Snelling, A.A. and Chaffin, E.F. (Eds.), Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth: A Young-Earth Creationist Research Initiative, Institute for Creation Research, California, and Creation Research Society, St. Joseph, Mississippi, 2000.
  2. Woodmorappe, J., The Mythology of Modern Dating Methods, Institute for Creation Research, California, 1999.

Conclusion

This scientific evidence, presented in leading journals, is a major problem for the idea of ‘millions of years’. It is, however, consistent with the vast fossil-bearing, sedimentary rock deposits of the Colorado Plateau having been laid down rapidly by the catastrophic global Flood described in the Bible, some 4,300 years ago. The dinosaurs that left footprints on the plateau, and were then buried and fossilized in the nearby rocks, also lived then—at the same time as man.

References and notes

  1. Such as the assumption of constant rates of change. Return to text.
  2. E.g. the amount of helium in the atmosphere, the decay and rapid reversals of Earth’s magnetic field, the salinity of the oceans, lack of continental erosion, and population statistics. A good summary is given by Morris, J.D., The Young Earth, Revised & Expanded, Master Books, Arizona, 1994. Return to text.
  3. Primary polonium-218 radiohalos command attention because they provide a record of extinct radioactivity in minerals constituting some of Earth’s most ancient rocks. See Gentry, R.V., Creation’s Tiny Mystery (3rd ed.), Earth Science Associates, Tennessee, 1992. Return to text.
  4. Obviously not a perfect analogy, despite being useful—a bullet into cork leaves equivalent damage all along its path, unlike the alpha particles which do most damage at the end, as stated. Return to text.
  5. The others decay by beta decay (β), not alpha (α). Note that due to overlap, only five of the eight rings of a 238U halo are normally visible. Return to text.
  6. Steiff, L.R. et al., A preliminary determination of the age of some uranium ores of the Colorado Plateau by the lead-uranium method, US Geological Survey Circular 271, 1953. Return to text.
  7. Jedwab, J., in: Given, P. (Ed.), Coal Science, American Chemical Society, Washington D.C., 1966. Return to text.
  8. Breger, I., in: Formation of Uranium Ore Deposits, Proceedings of Symposium in Athens 6–10 May 1974, pp. 99–124, International Atomic Energy Authority, Vienna, 1974. Return to text.
  9. Gentry, R.V., et al., Radiohalos and coalified wood: new evidence relating to the time of uranium introduction and coalification, Science 194:315–318, 1976. Return to text.
  10. Ref. 3, pp. 51–62. Return to text.
  11. Gentry, R.V., The Young Age of the Earth, Earth Science Associates LLC, Alpha Productions, 1996. Return to text.
  12. Gentry points out that the second halo could have formed from the decay of an isotope two steps back along the ‘chain’. Since the intermediary isotope undergoes beta, not alpha decay, the two possibilities cannot be distinguished from the halo. But this would stretch things from a maximum of around four years to some 22 years; a trivial matter. Return to text.
  13. The Eocene (supposedly 35–55 million years ago), the Jurassic (140–205 million years ago) and the Triassic (205–245 million years ago). See ref. 3, p. 56. Return to text.
  14. See refs. in McIntosh, A.C., Edmondson, T. and Taylor, S., Genesis and catastrophe: the Flood as the major Biblical cataclysm, Journal of Creation 14(1):101–109, 2000. Return to text.
  15. Using X-ray fluorescence (EXMRF) and the more sensitive ion microprobe mass analysis (IMMA). Return to text.
  16. The ratios of uranium to lead were up to 64,000, indicating the halos are only thousands of years old. Halos millions of years old would have a far lower uranium-to-lead ratio. For details see ref. 3, pp. 61–62; and ref. 9. Return to text.
  17. It is chemically implausible to believe that lead could be leached out, leaving uranium—the reverse is far more likely. Return to text.

Readers’ comments

Nicholas S.
A friend of 5 decades (sometimes intermittent in contact) had and still describes himself as relying on 'deep time' etc. After all this time, he is still waiting for the evidence to be presented. An explicit waste of time, in his past and present. As he describes himself atheist, relying on 'deep time', his own personal life, his own personal history, testifies to his great actual resultant personal losses (sadly knowing his history) and subsequent spiritual negative product of following such false doctrine. All resultant from rejecting God.
Interestingly though, however, he does not reject prayers for his needs. So the door is ajar. At least much has gone into his ears about the Gospel and God's Marvellous visible and invisible Creation and with our prayers for him to believe and one day, in God's Timing, his eyes will be opened and he will see the True Light of The Lord God's Salvation, 2 Peter 3:9.
Thank you CMI for your enormously valuable input, definitely helping to open the door wider. The more that is revealed by proper, factual, Scientific research, the more that Science reveals and aligns with the Truth and Inerrancy of the Bible, John 17:17. Actual Scientific Facts/Truths are God's Truth. Accuracy of True calculations shines Light into an otherwise dark world which tries to cover up the Truth by vain calculations based on empty theories and millions/billions of 'years', questionably, unjustifiably extrapolated out of thin air, Luke 12:2-3, Luke 8:17, 1 Corinthians 3:19. Thank you all at CMI for sincerely continuing to reveal Truth and expose/refute the unjustified attempts by others to camouflage the Actual Facts. Keep up the Good Work/Worship. At the end of the Day, we are sure, you will hear the True Words of The Lord, "Well done good and faithful servant"
Barbara H.
I think the absence of Pb-206 for these uranium halos in coalified wood is due to the loss of intermediate daughters, especially the loss of Rn-222, rather than to a young age. That is not to say I do not think these halos are in fact young but not for the reason given. The halo itself (100+ million fission tracks emitted radially) testifies to the amount of uranium decay that occurred, while the low Pb-206 to U-238 ratio shows it to be an open system. Unlike the halos in mica, there is no zircon to contain the daughter products. Even there, it is the exit by diffusion of some of the Rn-222 that allows for polonium halos to form elsewhere (per the transport model described in RATE Volume II). The absence of outer rings (polonium decay tracks) also supports the idea that the Rn-222 has gone missing. Thus the term "embryonic" for these uranium halos is a misnomer; "partial" halo would be more accurate.
Steve L.
But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear; I Peter 3:15
Thom P.
Brilliant work. Pilate asked Jesus, 'What is truth?' as he stood beside it.
Press on. Thank you.
Thom Park, Ph.D.
Principal
Principal
Bill P.
TY for sharing. Many yrs. ago I was listening to a scientist who believed (as I do) that Genesis IS HISTORY. He was talking about U-218 and how it was found in granite. He also mentioned that U-218 has a very short "half life" and that the granite found all over the earth had to have formed in a very very short period of time (I believed he said around 45-60 min). If I'm correct in recalling what he said then scientists (even those who do not believe The Word of God) must then know that the halos (U-218) found in granite blows up their theories of billions of yrs into a million pieces.
It causes me to think of The Book of Romans and what it says in Chap 1 about how They "Willingly Suppress The Truth" etc.
The Lord forgave me of many many sins. One of the many sins He forgave me of was the sin of telling lies. Many times in the past I KNEW the truth about something and lied about that truth. It's one thing to be ignorant about a matter, BUT to know the truth about something and willingly refuse to acknowledge that truth and replace it w/a lie has destroyed the souls of many people.
If I am wrong about granite containing U-218 I ask you to pardon my comment. I take very seriously The Word of God and His ways to be true and in no way wish to misrepresent what is in Scripture.
TY CMI for sharing your research, I enjoy it very much. I enjoy using it when I run across someone who tries to tell me that the theory of evolution and billions of yrs has been proven as a fact. When they try to use the evidence that evolutionists use to prove their theory as true it's good to have an answer that points to creation being "the truth". Yet The Lord will one day (I believe very soon) reveal Himself "in person" and all of those who trust and believe in Him will rejoice forever.
Tas Walker
Yes, the polonium-218 isotope indicates that granites formed very quickly. It used to be considered this indicated that granites formed instantaneously at creation. However, further evidence suggests they formed very quickly during the Flood. These articles are relevant:
Howard B.
I am impressed with the quality of this work. Thank you.
Dee M.
Excellent. Thank you for sharing.
Michael S.
Excellent article; it refreshes my mind about the halos. Together with the tracks as corroboration and other examples where time couldn't have passed in any meaningful way for the uniform view to work such as flat-gaps having no erosion and the recently found lack of erosion beneath the ice sheets I am guessing to be an evolutionist you have to really have to be committed to conjecture over facts. When I also consider the fact a lot of dino tracks also precede their fossils which are found higher up the strata this also fits with the flood scenario aka your recent B.E.D.S model. Then we have to consider the soft tissue that has been found in dino bones and C14 found in coal and other things where there shouldn't be any. It seems to me, when I weigh these pieces of evidence in my mind more and more as the years go on, the creation scientists are building up a tally of impressive evidence for the flood and the bible.

Great work, if only people could really do the thinking and understand the significance of this stuff.
Paul V.
I would assume the number of nuclear weapons tests would alter radiometric dating techniques.
Guy W.
Please present this to RT. Hon Michael Gove, Education Secretary for the British Government who has recently decreed that UK schools and educational institutions are forbidden from teaching the Creation model and to the gloating delight of David Attenborough and Richard Dawkins, only permitting Darwin's Theory of Evolution.
Tas Walker
Good idea. Do you know his contact details? Perhaps you could find them on the internet somewhere and you could forward the link, as you suggest. Or perhaps one of our UK friends could do it.
Harvey R.
It is silly for those who know God to argue with those who do not. They (the latter) simply cannot see. They are blind in their deception. It is that strong. How do I know my own mother is true. I would not attempt to argue the reality. I can tell them what she did for me -- how she gave birth to me, how she loved me, all she did for me. She is with the Lord now. I do not need to prove to anyone all she has been to me.
The science is born of an innate 'need to know' and is important for our safety, survival and development. I laugh when I remember as boys, we were building rafts. Some never reached completion but collapsed early in their construction. Others would not float. Some boys lacked the simple scientific knowledge of how to build a simple raft. Some learn the hard way, some head intelligent advice, some never learn. Truth holds all things together and never fails. We need to learn to join all the dots, otherwise we will sink like a poorly constructed raft. Science without truth is not true science. Thank you for what you do, Creation Ministries.
Harvey R.
I am heartened by your reports. Thank you that I know that I can refer evolutionists to someone who can tell them the truth about the science. Personally, I cannot grasp or remember the pertinent details but I know there is somewhere I can refer them to, if they genuinely are interested in truth. As for me I can only tell them that God's word is truth and I know it to be. I do not have to (and cannot) explain in scientific terms. I know by faith. and that faith has been strengthened by your work. I cringe now when I remember how, from my little scientific knowledge, I used to argue, sometimes quite heatedly, and probably put them off Christianity. Sad, but many probably fall into the same trap. Now ,God's grace is sufficient for me.

Comments are automatically closed 14 days after publication.