Natural Selection Questions and Answers
- Variation and natural selection versus evolution (from Refuting Evolution)
- Argument: Natural selection leads to speciation (from Refuting Evolution 2)
Atheopathy vs Science: Refuting New Scientist’s agitprop about evolution:
Evolution v natural selection
- Muddy Waters: Clarifying the confusion about natural selection
Does natural selection support evolution?
- Dear deer—when white ‘mutants’ have a selective advantage
- Bighorn horns not so big
- Defining terms: Evolutionist Dr John Endler’s refreshing clarity about ‘natural selection’ has been largely ignored
- The evolution train’s a-comin (Sorry, a-goin’—in the wrong direction)
- From ape to man via genetic meltdown: a theory in crisis
- Islands’ weeds don’t support evolution
- Well-armed water fleas and radishes
- What! … No potatoes?
- Molecular limits to natural variation
- Dawkins playing bait and switch with guppy selection
Do mutations that confer resistance to antibiotics, poisons, etc prove evolution?
- Anthrax and antibiotics: Is evolution relevant? (available in Spanish)
- Poison-resistant tomcods and the meaning of ‘evolution’
- Superbugs not super after all
- Patterns of change over time: organophosphorus resistance in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina
- Creationist article ‘saved my favourite cow’
- Has AIDS evolved?
How does natural selection fit into a creationist paradigm?
- Natural selection ≠ evolution
- Darwin’s Finches: Evidence supporting rapid post-Flood adaptation
- Genetics: No Friend of Evolution
- “A Parade of Mutants”—Pedigree Dogs and Artificial Selection
Does sexual selection explain how features like the peacock's tail developed?
Does it take long periods of time for natural selection to occur?
- Brisk Biters—fast changes in mosquitoes astonish evolutionists, delight creationists
- Review of The Beak of the Finch: Evolution in Real Time
- Do toads goad snake evolution?
- Rapid tomcod ‘evolution by pollution’? Yeah, right … and wrong
What about peppered moths? Why are they frequently used to support evolution?
- Goodbye, peppered moths: A classic evolutionary story unstuck
- The moth files
- A recent attempt to restore the reputation of the peppered moth as an evolutionary icon falls flat
What about computer simulations allegedly proving evolution by cumulative selection?
- Weasel, a flexible program for investigating deterministic computer ‘demonstrations’ of evolution
- Genetic algorithms—do they show that evolution works?
- Genetic algorithms and robotic folly
- Genetic algorithms are irrelevant to evolution
- Spore: new game allows players to evolve creatures; should creationists be concerned? (see also a response to critics of this article)
Related Q&A pages
- 15 Questions for Evolutionists -- Question 3
- 15 Questions for Evolutionists -- Question 4
- CMI: Teaching creationism is child abuse? (Part 3)
- CMI: Teaching creationism is child abuse? (Part 1)
- How natural selection supports a recent creation -- Creation Magazine LIVE! (2-02)
We support belief in an intelligent designer—the God of the Bible. This site was also ‘intelligently designed’. But rather than six days, it’s taken thousands of days. Help us design more information for this site. Support this site