That atheists loathe creation ministries should surprise no-one. As Oxford
evolutionist and antitheist Richard Dawkins claimed, it was impossible
to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist before Darwin. And since Darwin’s
theory was proposed to allegedly explain life without God, undermining
Darwin would undermine the atheist’s faith.
So it is mystifying that many conservative Christian Bible colleges and
seminaries also seem to loathe creationists. But for those among them which
are genuinely conservative, rather than liberals in conservative clothing,
the answer may come from a well-meaning love for the Bible (trying to protect
it from being ‘falsified by science’) that ends up undermining
As our interview with Hebrew scholar Dr Ting Wang (pp. 48–51 [of this issue]) shows, the Hebrew
of Genesis is clear about creation in six consecutive normal-length days,
a global Flood, and that death and suffering came in with Adam’s
sin. This was also the overwhelming view of the Church
Fathers and Reformers.1
But around 1800, anti-Christians began teaching that the world was much
older than the Bible taught. The Church responded in various ways.
A number of theological liberals (‘wolves in sheep’s clothing’, or even ‘wolves in shepherds’ clothing’)
were only too happy to accept this fledgling new ‘science’.
But they fully agreed with their forebears (and today’s liberals)
about what the Bible intended to say; they merely regarded the Bible’s
clear statements as being disproven by science.
But the conservatives loved the Bible, and (rightly) believed that it
was completely accurate. However, many were intimidated by the new long-age
‘science’, and invented ways of ‘reinterpreting’
what the Bible said, to allegedly harmonize with ‘science’.
This was the origin of such ideas as the day-age notion, the gap theory,
the framework hypothesis and ‘theistic evolution’.
Others, called the Scriptural Geologists, refused to
‘pretzelize’ the Bible, and challenged the assumptions of long-age
geology. But most in the church found it easier to appease the long-age
anti-Christians, so the Scriptural Geologists were largely ignored2 (although
Consequence of appeasement
Far from such appeasement on Genesis history protecting the credibility
of the Bible, the reverse happened. The whole Bible, with its faith
and morality, came under attack. And these critics are being consistent—if
the first book of the Bible needs to be twisted to fit ‘science’,
why not everything else? As Jesus told Nicodemus (John 3:12):
‘I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?’
If Jesus was wrong about earthly things (such as a recent creation (
Mark 10:6–9) and a global flood (Luke 17:26–27)),
was He also wrong about a heavenly thing like John 3:16,
only four verses later? If not, why not?
It is no accident that churches and institutions which start rejecting
Genesis history generally move on to rejecting other vital doctrines. Many
churches that started by rejecting biblical authority in ‘science’
areas now have ministers who actually reject the Resurrection and Virginal
Conception of Christ. After all, ‘science’ says that dead men
don’t rise and virgins don’t conceive.
Reclaiming the ground
Creation magazine seeks to recover biblical authority in a number
of ways. The first is to show the importance of Genesis creation. As shown
on p. 43, creation is not in
the same category as end-times debates and other disputes such as baptism,
the Sabbath, or church governance. While important, these debates presuppose biblical
authority and disagree only about its meaning. But the creation issue is
about whether the Bible or ‘science’ is the authority.
True science backs the Bible, as well-qualified scientists, such as bird
expert Dr Mike Tarburton (pp. 14–17),
attest. The amazing design in creation defies evolutionary explanations,
such as the spider’s spectacular sticky feet (pp. 54–55). And observational evidence
of catastrophic burial (pp. 10–12)
is consistent with the biblical Flood and an enigma for slow-and-gradual
It’s no accident that God has used Creation magazine to bring
many people to salvation. Why not make a subscription a
Christmas gift to your friends and family?
Comments are automatically closed 14 days after publication.
Be constructive & courteous. Don't attack individuals, denominations, or other organizations.
Stay on-topic. We're not here to debate matters like eschatology, baptism, or Bible translation.
Links to external sites and articles will be removed from your submission.
Privacy & Content Ownership
Comments become the property of Creation Ministries International upon submission and may be edited for brevity and clarity.
CMI may choose not to publish your comment depending on how well it fits the guidelines outlined above.
By submitting your comment you are agreeing to receive email updates from Creation Ministries International. You may unsubscribe at any time.
If your comment is published, your name will be displayed as ""
Accept & Continue
You are leaving CREATION.com
We have supplied this link to an article on an external website in good faith. But we cannot assume responsibility for, nor be taken as endorsing in any way, any other content or links on any such site. Even the article we are directing you to could, in principle, change without notice on sites we do not control.