New documentary: Dismantled: A Scientific Deconstruction of the Theory of Evolution
The online premiere has ended, but you can order the DVD or Blu-ray here.
Also Available in:
This article is from
Creation 41(3):26–27, July 2019

Browse our latest digital issue Subscribe

Dinosaur footprint treasure trove found in Britain


© Johan Lindgrendinasour-foot-print
Dinosaur claw mark

Beautifully preserved dinosaur footprints found recently near Hastings in southern England are the most diverse and detailed ever found in the UK. More than 85 of these trace fossils, representing at least seven species, were discovered and documented by a Cambridge University research team.1 “As well as the large abundance and diversity of these prints, we also see absolutely incredible detail,” said lead author Anthony Shillito. “You can clearly see the texture of the skin and scales, as well as four-toed claw marks, which are extremely rare.”2

From 2014 to 2018, coastal erosion of the alleged ‘Cretaceous-aged’ (145–100 million years old) Ashdown Formation led to cliff collapses, revealing previously hidden footprints. The team visited five times during this period to examine these freshly fallen blocks of rock which contained most of the footprints. The now-accessible material had originated at the base of the Lee Ness Sandstone, which sits upon a layer of mudstone. The footprints ranged from 2 cm (0.8 in.) to over 60 cm (2 ft) across, and were identified as coming from, iguanodontians, an ankylosaur, a stegosaur, theropods, and sauropods.

As most of the footprints are confined to the fallen blocks, the majority are of single footprints; some are trackways of two to three, but never more than five in a row. This highly diverse range of well-preserved footprints (with likely more to be revealed with further erosion) adds to an already substantial list of dinosaur finds in the Hastings area. These include the original Iguanodon (1822), and the incredible find of the first-ever fossilized dinosaur brain.3

How to preserve dino prints

Dinosaur skin impression

“To preserve footprints, you need the right type of environment,” said co-author Neil Davies. “The ground needs to be ‘sticky’ enough so that the footprint leaves a mark, but not so wet that it gets washed away. You need that balance in order to capture and preserve them.” Of course, they would still need to be buried quickly under another layer of sediment before being eroded away.

The majority of the footprints were made in the silty mud that hardened into mudstone which lies just beneath the sandstone. It is here that “Footprints with skin impressions are preferentially seen … cast directly into the underlying mudstone, and are clear evidence of the complete preservation of true surface traces.”

Many of those made in the lowermost layer of the sandstone, which also records ripple marks, lack skin impressions. So the consistency of the material the dinosaur stood in directly affected the detail of the print left behind. Indeed some of the fossil footprints in the mudstone show where the mud was slightly too wet, leaving a less well-defined footprint and mud squelching up inbetween the dinosaur’s toes.

Slow forming layers?

The study’s authors suggest that these footprint-bearing layers were laid down on a flood plain, and that there were prolonged periods of sedimentary stasis (pause in laying down of sediment) between them to allow for the trackways to be imparted. But does this make sense? Everyday life informs any thinking person that these trackways could not have been around for any lengthy period of time prior to burial.

Consider the police responding to a burglary and finding fresh footprints in some mud leading away from the scene. When they task crime scene investigators to take a cast of the footprint they come quickly! Why? Because they understand that the footprints will be gone quickly. This could even be minutes, or hours, depending on the weather conditions. Even prints hardened by being sun-baked, if not buried reasonably soon thereafter and thus removed from the effects of wind and rain, will scarcely last for a handful of years, let alone thousands or millions. Indeed, due to the ongoing costal erosion, on each of the five visits the team saw the exposure of new material and the degradation of previously observed tracks. Sometimes they even totally disappeared—and consider that, if anything, the material containing the tracks would have become more erosion-resistant from being hardened since its burial.

The study also revealed that there was widespread invertebrate burrowing in the rocks they examined, but that this never occurred internally within the dinosaur footprints. The implication of this is that the dinosaur stepped into soft material in which burrowing had freshly occurred, and before this could continue a new layer of sediment was rapidly laid down on top, preventing any further burrowing.

The Bible has the answer

So slow-and-gradual processses can’t explain this magnificent track site that preserves high-fidelity skin and claw impressions. A far better explanation is the global Noahic Flood some 4,500 years ago. As the Flood “waters prevailed on the earth 150 days” (Genesis 7:24), it would deposit sedimentary layers. And various processes, including vertical tectonic land movements, would have caused water to retreat temporarily to expose these layers. This is the BEDS (Briefly Exposed Diluvial Sediments) hypothesis.4

During this calamitous time, groups of dinosaurs and other creatures sought refuge on higher land not yet reached by the water, or swam to sections of land briefly exposed by such surface fluctuations. As the waters encroached on this land as well, these animals would flee away, leaving their footprints behind, such as in this mudstone.

As the water level rose again, it would bring in fresh sediment to cover and preserve the footprints. This oscillating process could be repeated a number of times in quick succession. This could account for footprints found on several different layers on top of one another, often of the same species. In long-age models this would mean that the same species left its prints at the same spot, but with each occurrence separated by many thousands or millions of years—an amazing coincidence!

This model offers a straightforward explanation for what cannot otherwise be adequately explained using long periods of time. Taking Noah’s Flood into account often provides good answers to what otherwise can seem perplexing for those who refuse to consider it.

Increasing softness of mud

References and notes

  1. Shillito, P., & Davies, N., Dinosaur-landscape interactions at a diverse Early Cretaceous tracksite (Lee Ness Sandstone, Ashdown Formation, southern England), J. Palaeo. 514:593–612, 2019. Return to text.
  2. Collins, S., ‘Treasure trove’ of dinosaur footprints found in southern England, cam.ac.uk, 17 Dec 2018. Return to text.
  3. Brasier, M.D. and 7 others, Remarkable preservation of brain tissues in an Early Cretaceous iguanodontian dinosaur, Geological Society448(1):383–398, 27 Oct 2016. Return to text.
  4. Oard, M.J., Dinosaur Challenges and Mysteries: How the Genesis Flood Makes Sense of Dinosaur Evidence Including Tracks, Nests, Eggs, and Scavenged Bones, CBP, 2011; available at creation.com/s/10-2-582. Return to text.

Helpful Resources

Rock Solid Answers
by Michael J Oard, John K Reed
US $20.00
Soft Cover
How Noah's Flood Shaped Our Earth
by Michael J Oard, John K Reed
US $17.00
Soft Cover

Readers’ comments

Glenn W.
I found more than 20 footprints ranging in size from an inch to a foot across in the town of Channahon, Illinois.

If you want exact location of the finds, just ask via email as I am currently living in Capetown, South Africa.
Bill P.
I'm an old man now so I haven't gone deer hunting for a long time as I did in my youth. (I hunted for the meat and not to just hang a head on my wall as a trophy). Once or twice I had shot a deer but had to follow it's tracks w/traces of blood before I found the deer laying on the ground to process and take back home. Just wondering if in your experience if you ever came across the end of the tracks and found the fossilized bones of the animal itself ? It just makes sense to me that at times this might have happened. Love your sight, keep up the good work.
Thomas E. G.
I am a physicist, worked 37 years on NASA projects, but that aside I am firmly a creationist. The pure logic presented in this article of how the footprints formed makes absolute sense. Footprints don’t last in wind and rain for eons while rock forms above them. The only way these prints could be preserved is a rapid covering of rock forming material over them such as happens in a flood. Science is a God given tool for mankind to attempt to understand how things work. I'm amazed that the presuppositions of those who claim to be scientists drive results rather than simple observations and logic.

We as true Christ-followers accept Biblical statements as God’s truths by faith. Faith is based on truths revealed by God. Those who would resist God start out by rejection of Genesis so they can then make themselves and the mind of men their standard of truth and faith. What a shallow ground that is! Many who ‘profess’ to be Christians foolishly hold to evolution. This itself is illogical because if one chooses to believe Genesis is a lie, why would they believe any other part of the Bible was truth.

True Christians do not pick and choose which part of the Bible to believe. Christ certainly believed Genesis from what He said. Simple logic says that for Christ to be our Savior, He must be perfectly sinless. Christ did believe Genesis, so in His perfection Genesis must also be God’s truth. We also know from Peter truth is exactly what all Scripture is from 2 Peter 1:19–21. If one claims to be Christian, they will be believers in all of Scripture especially Genesis. It is God’s first words to us. It can't start with a lie and then build to truth. That is illogical.Thank you for all you do. My prayer is that those who ‘profess’ Christ will find Him and the truth of all Scripture.
Robert H.
Awesome evidence of Noah's flood! There is only one reason for the evolutionists to refute the flood and that is to try to exclude Almighty God as the Creator of everything.

Comments are automatically closed 14 days after publication.