Explore
Dating
Back to Topics
Page 5 of 7 (77 Articles)
The dating game
Scientists won’t accept radiometric dates they don’t like, as arguments over Mungo Man show.
by Tas Walker
Eroding ages
The continents cannot be billions of years old because they would have eroded away long ago; there should be nothing left.
by Tas Walker
Trial balloons and the age of the earth
Scientists release their calculated ‘age’ into academic space, never sure if it will float or be shot down like a balloon.
by Tas Walker
How does the Bible teach 6,000 years?
Calculating the dates from the Flood to the Exile.
by Lita Sanders
Radiometric dating and the age of the Earth
The 4.5 billion-year radiometric ‘age’ of the earth is based on faulty assumptions even secular researchers have acknowledged.
by Ralph W. Matthews, Ph.D.
Evidences for a young earth and universe
‘Billions of years’ is accepted without question but there is lots of evidence that the earth and universe are much, much younger.
by Don Batten
Our young solar system
Multiple lines of evidence support the Bible’s age of the solar system.
by Wayne Spencer
C-14 dates and the HK ‘ark’ claim
Discrepant C-14 dates provide further skepticism of the recent claims to have found Noah’s Ark on Mt Ararat.
by Carl Wieland
The Oklo natural reactors in Precambrian rocks, Gabon, Africa
The nuclear reactor that began without human intervention
by Eugene Chaffin
The fatal flaw with radioactive dating methods
When you peel away the mystery it’s obvious that the dates are not objectively measured.
by Tas Walker
Dating of “oldest pottery” from China is based on assumptions
The evidence is consistent with biblical history.
by Tas Walker
Age of the earth
Data from many different sources point to a young age for the cosmos; not billions of years.
by Don Batten