The uniformitarian puzzle of mountaintop planation surfaces
Planation surfaces are a common feature across the earth.1,2 But secular researchers often find these surfaces perplexing because it is not unusual to find them at the top of rugged mountains (figure 1):
“Extensive tracts of low-gradient topography in steep mountain ranges, either forming rangetop plateaus or terraced pediments on range flanks are widely distributed in mountain belts around the world.”3
Calvet et al.’s survey of these flat-topped mountains establishes their frequency across the globe.3 Calvet et al. also point out that they are even found atop some of the most active and rapidly eroding mountains on the planet.
Uniformitarian scientists cannot explain
What makes these planation surfaces so puzzling for uniformitarian scientists is that they are not currently forming and their past formation appears to be independent of variables, such as rock lithology and the tilt of sedimentary rocks.3 The authors admit they cannot explain these mountaintop planation surfaces:
“Such low-gradient features are enigmatic given that an expected ˃50% of total denudation and 40% of chemical denudation occur on the steepest ~10% of the Earth’s continental surface, i.e., mainly in mountains … . This would suggest that the chances of survival of planar landforms in mountain environments are slim.”3
Some ideas rejected arbitrarily
It is interesting that although the secular scientists cannot explain planation or erosion surfaces, they are not open to the possibility that this could be a signature of a global flood. They reject my explanation simply because I am a creationist: “(note; here we ignore creationist views of planation surfaces, e.g. michael.oards.net/)”.3 They also reject the explanation provided by Ollier and Pain, apparently because Ollier and Pain do not fully accept plate tectonics.4 Ollier and Pain believe strata were first folded, then planed in the Miocene, the early part of the late Cenozoic, and then were uplifted globally during the Pliocene and Pleistocene, the very late Cenozoic.5 Accordingly most of the planing was done before mountain formation.
Planation surfaces and pediments carved by Flood runoff
Ollier and Pain’s explanation of the event sequence for the formation of mountaintop planation surfaces is generally correct, but they are unable to keep planation surfaces from eroding over millions of years, making it likely that their understanding of the timeframe is wrong. Calvet et al.’s argument is weaker than that of Ollier and Pain, because with no clear way to connect planation surfaces in their framework to a single event, or even a single suite of causes, they are forced to resort to unknown ‘case-by-case conditions’ to explain the phenomena they observe.3 They truly have no idea how to explain mountaintop planation surfaces.
The fundamental problem for both Ollier and Pain and Calvet et al. is deep time. Eons of time attenuates the link between causes and effects so much that it’s practically impossible to establish causal links between observed effects. The Flood, however, is a specified event in which the duration is sufficiently short to enable the investigator to posit plausible causal links in observed geological phenomena and their relationships, and an adequate cause for the phenomena we see. In other words, a plausible cause-effect narrative has a better chance of being constructed in the context of Noah’s Flood.6
In the case of mountaintop planation surfaces, they are best explained as a function of the Recessive Stage of the Flood. During Flood water runoff, the continents and mountains rose with much erosion.1,2,7 It is expected that during uplift rapid currents would plane the top of the rocks by erosion. Continued uplift and channel erosion would divide large planation surfaces into isolated remnants near the tops of the mountains. At lower elevations this erosion would divide the planation surfaces into large areas, such as plains or plateaus, depending upon the amount of uplift. The major planing episodes would have happened during the Abative or Sheet Flow Phase of the Flood.8
As mountains and plateaus rose above the Flood water, the water was forced to channelize down valleys. Within mountain valleys, fast flow toward the sinking ocean basins created planation surfaces along the edge of the mountains, called pediments.1,2,9 The planation surfaces and pediments still exist because there was insufficient time for erosion to destroy these features, especially in arid to semi-arid areas. The lack of erosion provides another piece of evidence that deep time is an invalid construct, and that planation surfaces are very young.
Ollier and Pain would date the mountaintop planation surfaces as mid Cenozoic. Calvet and colleagues would also date them as mostly Cenozoic: “The presence of erosion surfaces in many mountain ranges of Cenozoic age raises issues [emphasis added]”.3 Given this designation, in the biblical framework the great mountain uplifts and planing occurred in the last half of the Flood during Flood runoff 10 or in the Recessive Stage.7 This would indicate a largely late Cenozoic Flood/post-Flood boundary in areas with planation surfaces and pediments, assuming the geological column for sake of discussion.
References and notes
- Oard, M.J., Flood by Design: Receding Water Shapes the Earth’s Surface, Master Books, Green Forest, AR, 2008. Return to text.
- Oard, M.J., ebook, Earth’s Surface Shaped by Genesis Flood Runoff, 2013, michael.oards.net/GenesisFloodRunoff.htm. Return to text.
- Calvet, M., Gunnell, Y. and Fariness, B., Flattopped mountain ranges: their global distribution and value for understanding the evolution of mountain topography, Geomorphology 241:255, 2015. Return to text.
- Ollier, C. and Pain, C., The Origin of Mountains, Routledge, London, 2000. Return to text.
- Oard, M.J., The Mountains Rose: Review of Cliff Ollier and Colin Pain, The Origin of Mountains, J. Creation 16(3):40–43, 2002. Return to text.
- A good example of this is documented by Reed, J.K., Changing paradigms in stratigraphy—a quite different way of analyzing the record, J. Creation 30(1):83–88, 2016. Return to text.
- Oard, M.J., Surficial continental erosion places the Flood/post-Flood boundary in the late Cenozoic, J. Creation 27(2):62–70, 2013. Return to text.
- Walker, T., A Biblical geological model; in: Walsh, R.E. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Creationism, technical symposium sessions, Creation Science Fellowship, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 581–592, 1994. Return to text.
- Oard, M.J., Pediments formed by the Flood: evidence for the Flood/post-Flood boundary in the late Cenozoic, J. Creation 18(2):15–27, 2004. Return to text.
- Oard, M.J., The Flood/Post-Flood Boundary Is in the Late Cenozoic with Little Post-Flood Catastrophism, 2014, michael.oards.net/PostFloodBoundary.htm. Return to text.
This discussion of planation reminds me of a rather blatant example of this in the Eastern Sierra, just north of Bishop, California. The flat topped sediment hills at the bottom of the Sherwin grade tell the story of either post-flood sheet flow or a post Ice Age ice dam breaking and causing the same. These are easily seen from hwy 395. The famous Owen's River Gorge (immediately above the planed hills) is yet another "grand canyon" that, like the others, was probably created in hours or days, rather than eons. [While the Gorge can be visualized on Google Earth, the planation can only been seen via photographs--which I would be happy to provide...] Oh, yes, this is an arid area: the annual rainfall in the Sierra's shadow is about 3--5"/year. And that explains the lack of erosion.
This, and the related article on the remarkable pan-African planar surface, make fascinating reading, giving an indication of the huge forces at work during the Noahic Flood. One wonders if anyone has tried experimental verification, such as Guy Berthault used in his work on sedimentation. Also, do you have any views on the formation of the 'duricrusts'? Presumably these are chemical leachates, precipitated on a vast scale. How barren the world would be without them!
Oh really! We ignore them? Well, if they don't even bother trying to refute them that's good evidence that you are correct.
Great piece! It's interesting that here in NZ, which seems to have appeared after the flood, as recycled ocean floor, there aren't any obvious planation surfaces.